Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (1) TMI 142 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

2016 (1) TMI 142 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT - [2016] 88 VST 190 (P&H) - Whether the first appellate authority was justified and within its jurisdiction to remand the matter for passing fresh assessment order after considering the issues which were not assailed by the assessee - Held that:- Court that under the HGST Act, the appellate authority i.e. the DETC(A) had not been vested with the powers to act on his own motion. Only when an appeal was filed under Section 39 of the Act, did the appel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

points or issues not raised,pleaded or urged by the appellant. Accordingly, the DETC(A) was not held to be competent to go into the matters not raised in the appeal and set aside the order of the assessing authority. - Appellate authority was not justified in remanding the matter for fresh assessment for considering those issues which were not subject matter of appeal before it. Consequently, the impugned order dated 30.3.2015 passed by the Tribunal as well as order dated 17.7.2014 passed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Kumar Mittal, J. 1. This order shall dispose of VATAP Nos.11 to 14 of 2015 as according to the learned counsel for the parties, the issue involved in all these appeals is identical. However, the facts are being extracted from VATAP No.11 of 2015. 2. VATAP No.11 of 2015 has been filed by the revenue under Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (in short, the CST Act) read with Section 68 of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (in short, the PVAT Act) against the order dated 30.3.2015, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellate authority is empowered to decide those issues which have not been raised in the grounds of appeal and no appeal has been filed by the revenue? 3. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in VATAP No.11 of 2015 may be noticed. The assessee is a dealer who is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of cement having its manufacturing units at Ropar and Bathinda in Punjab. The Ropar unit is exempted under th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

up for consideration by the assessing authority on the basis of annual returns filed by the appellant in VAT 20. In the reruns filed by the appellant, it had calculated notional tax liability on the stock transfers made by it to its own branches in other States for subsequent sale as per the value of goods at the time of dispatch derived by adding margin and primary freight upto the destination in the cost of the goods and some portion of gross profit so as to arrive at the correct value of sto .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

borne by the consignee branch. The tax was calculated on the said value at the rate of 4% and was reduced from the total overall exemption limit of the assessee which was available to it at the beginning of the year 2009-10. For the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07, similar methodology had been adopted by the appellant and was being accepted by the respondents. Before the Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner, detailed submissions had been made by the assessee to the effect that only t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gh in principle, he had agreed with the appellant that besides these two components, the value of goods could not be included in any other manner. Feeling aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals) [DETC(A)]. The DETC (A) recorded the version of the Excise and Taxation Inspector in detail to the effect that the impugned order was illegal and needed to be set aside as fresh orders were required to be made since the stock transfer price had be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed fresh assessment proceedings in pursuance to the directions given by the first appellate authority. The assessee approached this Court by filing CWP No.18476 of 2014. This court allowed the assessment proceedings to continue but directed that draft order shall be produced before the court on the next date of hearing. The assessee approached the Apex Court by filing SLP(C) No.26831 of 2014. The Apex Court granted liberty to the assessee to raise the issues before this court. In pursuance to th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

were dismissed. Hence the instant appeals by the assessees. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. The primary issue that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the first appellate authority was justified and within its jurisdiction to remand the matter for passing fresh assessment order after considering the issues which were not assailed by the assessee. Support was drawn from judgments in State of Haryana vs. Frick India limited, (1990) 76 STC 148 (P&H), Global .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thority for the assessment year 2007-08 had initiated revisional proceedings but had dropped them in the light of the order of the first appellate authority. Thus, a prayer was made for revival of the revisional proceedings. 7. The matter is no longer res integra. In State of Haryana vs. Frick India Limited, (1990) 76 STC 148, the question for consideration was whether the appellate authority was competent to go into the matters which were not raised in appeal and direct examination of the fresh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction 39 of the Act, did the appellate authority adjudicate upon the specific issues raised in the grounds of appeal or upon those which were urged before it at the time of hearing. The respondent was also given an opportunity to be heard and to reply to the points raised by the appellant. However, the appellate authority while deciding an appeal filed by a party could not take up issues on merit which had not been raised by the appellant. The respondent in the appeal could not invite the appell .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he appeal lies to the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner ; when the order is made by the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, to the Commissioner and if the order is made by the Commissioner, to the Tribunal. 7. It is also clear from the language of Section 39 and has indeed been conceded by the learned counsel for the parties that both the assessee and the department can file appeals against the orders by which they are aggrieved. On an appeal filed, the appellate authority has been in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed by any order passed by an authority exercising jurisdiction under the Act or the Rules, may file an appeal against that order raising its grievances and pleas challenging the legality and propriety of the order. Whatever pleas are raised by a party in its appeal, are examined by the appellate authority and a decision is rendered thereon affirming by varying, amending or rescinding the impugned orders or remanding the case for fresh decision. This jurisdiction, however, can be invoked only on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

India Limited's case (supra) was followed by this Court in Global Business India Pvt. Limited's case (supra), wherein it was recorded as under:- 11. The issue in respect of the power of the Tribunal to enhance the tax liability came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in State of Kerala v. Vijaya Stores, (1978) 4 SCC 41. The Court held that Kumar Vimal the Tribunal cannot enhance the Tax lability against the dealer in an 2013.04.26 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt after giving the party a reasonable opportunity of being heard and it was urged that such power could be exercised even when the appeal against the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's assessment order had been preferred by the assessee and not by the Department. To place such a construction on sub-section (4) (a)(i) would amount to ignoring the scheme of Section 39. Subsection (1) provides for an appeal being preferred against an assessment order passed by the Appellate Assistant Commissio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

conferred upon the Appellate Tribunal while disposing of such appeals (including cross-objections) and the power conferred upon the Appellate Tribunal under Section 4(a) (i) is "to confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment"; the power to enhance the assessment must be appropriately read as relatable to an appeal or cross-objections filed by the Department. The normal rule that a party not appealing from a decision must be deemed to be satisfied with the decision, must be taken t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

igarh VATAP Nos.123 & 122 of 2012 -8- the assessment. Further, to accept the construction placed by the counsel for the appellant on sub-section (4) (a) (i) would be really rendering sub-section (2) of Section 39 otiose, for if in an appeal preferred by the assessee against the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order the tribunal would have the power to enhance the assessment, a provision for cross-objections by the Department was really unnecessary. Having regard to the entire scheme o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e bench of this court in a judgment reported as Fixwell Pushin Cords Pvt. Ltd. case (supra). We may notice that the provisions under consideration in Vijaya Stores case (supra) were some what different. The Kerala Act contemplated filing of appeal and cross objections. Therefore, the court held that scheme of the Statue does not contemplate enhancement of Tax, without availing the remedy of appeal or cross objections. Though, in the Statue under consideration, there is no provision of filing of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh VATAP Nos.123 & 122 of 2012 -9- orders in accordance with the orders now passed by this court. However, the acceptance of these appeals will not preclude the Revenue to initiate such other proceedings as are permissible in law against the dealer in accordance with law. 8. Similarly in The State of Kerala vs. M/s Vijaya Stores, (1978) 4 SCC 41, enhancement of assessment by the Tribunal in the absence of cross appeal or cross objections .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion (3) of section 34 and any person objecting to an order passed by the Deputy Commissioner under subsection (1) of section 35, and any person objecting to an order passed by the inspecting Assistant Commissioner under clause (c) of sub-section (4) of section 28 may, within a period of sixty days from the date on which the order was served on him in the manner prescribed, appeal against such order to the Appellate Tribunal; Provided that the Appellate 'Tribunal may admit an appeal presente .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or any part thereof, file, within thirty days of the receipt of the notice, a memo random of cross-objections, verified in the prescribed manner against any part of the appellate Assistant Commissioner, and such memorandum shall be disposed of by the Appellate Tribunal as if it were an appeal presented within the time specified in sub-section (1). [1961] 12 S.T.C. 677. 19-526 SCI/78542 (3) The appeal or the memorandum of cross-objections shall be in the prescribed form and shall be verified in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e assessment or penalty or both; (ii) set aside the assessment and direct the asses sing authority to make a fresh assessment after such further enquiry as may be directed; or (iii) pass such other orders as it may think fit; or (b) in the case of any other order, confirm, cancel or vary such order." Considerable emphasis was laid by counsel for 'the appellant upon sub-s.(4) which indicates what things the Appellate Tribunal may do while disposing of an appeal and in particular it was p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ould amount to ignoring the scheme of s. 39. Sub-s. (1) provides for an appeal being preferred against an assessment order passed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner under s. 34(3) either by the assessee or by the Department through an officer empowered by the Government in that behalf. Further, sub-3. (2) provides for filling of cross-objections by a party, against whom an appeal has been preferred, notwithstanding that he has not himself appealed against the decision or any part thereof an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the Department. The normal rule that a party not appealing from a decision must be deemed to be satisfied with the decision, must be taken to have acquiesced therein and be bound by it. and, therefore, cannot seek relief against a rival party in an appeal preferred by the latter, has not been deviated from in sub-s.(4)(a)(i) above. In other words, in the absence of an appeal or cross-objections by the Department against the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order the Appellate Tribunal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version