New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (1) TMI 280 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2016 (1) TMI 280 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - TMI - Input Tax Credit - levy of penalty - TNVAT - gross violation of principles of natural justice without conducting - The petitioner herein filed a petition under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act to the respondent on 5.11.2015 stating that the revised order has been passed by mistake of law and mistake of fact of incorrect adoption of amount of ITC reversed and hence, it is liable to be rectified under Section 84 of the Act and requested the respondent to iss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Joseph Prabakar learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), who took notice for the respondent and with their consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal. 2. The petitioner company is a baker involved in the manufacture of both taxable and exempted bakery products and in addition to the manufacture of bakery products, it also involved in trading of branded bakery products of other companies. The petitioner is a registered dea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing to reverse the difference ITC amount of ₹ 9,31,107.00 under Section 19(12) of the Act for the assessment year 2012-2013 and also proposed to levy penalty at 50% on the differential ITC amount at ₹ 4,65,554/-. Therefore, the petitioner filed a detailed objections in their letter dated 26.09.2015 highlighting the difference in the amount of ITC, the exempted and total turnover adopted in the formula for the computation of reversal of ITC. Despite this, the respondent in its impugne .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ctified under Section 84 of the Act and requested the respondent to issue a revised order. The respondent had rejected the said petition filed by the petitioner by order passed in TIN/33040640221/2012-2013/RC/96/15 (AG) dated 16.11.2015, observing that the impugned order dated 5.10.2015 was passed after considering the objections and also providing an opportunity of personal hearing. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned ord .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version