Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (1) TMI 333 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (1) TMI 333 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2016 (332) E.L.T. 185 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Denial of SSI Exemption - Use of other's brand name - factory located in rural area - whether the respondent has correctly availed the benefit of Notification No.8/2002-CE dated 01.03.2002 during the financial year 2002-03 - Held that:- Show-cause notice as well as the findings of the first appellate authority clearly record that the benefit of Notification No.8/2002-CE is denied on the ground that the appellant is not el .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tehsildar of the Village that the factory of the appellant is located in the rural area and another certificate which has been issued by the Regional Officer, MIDC, Nagpur to the same effect. It is not the case of the Revenue, the Regional Officer, MIDC could not have issued the said certificate indicating that the respondent's factory is located in rural area. As against such a specific findings of the first appellate authority, we find that the Grounds of Appeal does not provide any evidence c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Order-in-Appeal No. SVS/470/NGP-I/2006 dated 30.11.2006. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved in this case is whether the respondent has correctly availed the benefit of Notification No.8/2002-CE dated 01.03.2002 during the financial year 2002-03. It was the case of the Revenue in the show-cause notice that the appellant had manufactured various products and cleared the said finished goods by availing the benefit of Notification 8/2002-CE but the said finished good .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

red these products in the rural area and the benefit of Notification 8/2002-CE are applicable as Tehsildar of the Village and the Regional Officer, MIDC, Nagpur have given certificates that the factory of the appellant falls under Rural area as defined in the Notification No. 8/2002-CE. 4. We find that the show-cause notice as well as the findings of the first appellate authority clearly record that the benefit of Notification No.8/2002-CE is denied on the ground that the appellant is not eligib .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the area under any municipal committee, municipal corporation, town area committee, cantonment board or notified area committee or, (ii) any area that may be notified as an urban area by Central Govt. or State Govt." 4.1 It is the case of the Revenue that the appellant's factory is situated in MIDC notified by the Government of Maharashtra hence falls under the category of exclusively carved out by a Notification. We have considered the submissions made by learned D.R. on this point and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version