Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Divine Impex Versus Commissioner of Customs (I) , Mumbai

2016 (1) TMI 589 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Condonation of delay of 583 days in filing the appeal - in the RTI he was informed that the order dated 2.1.2013 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the applicant's case was dispatched by Speed Post on 3.1.2013, but the same was returned by Posta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

missioner (Appeals) supplied the copy of the impugned order which was received by the applicant on 25.8.2014. He submitted that the fact of the matter is that the applicant is not at fault in filing the appeal as the order was not supplied to them in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ember (J) And Raju, Member (T) For the Appellant : Mr Prasad Paranjape, Adv For the Respondent : Mr. D K Sinha, Assistant Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per S S Garg The applicant has filed an application seeking condonation of delay of 583 days in filing t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

peal filed by the applicant. The copy of the impugned order dated 2.1.2013 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) was never communicated to the applicant and he had no knowledge of the same. The applicant came to know about the impugned order somewhere .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Appeals) to issue a certified copy of the impugned order and vide letter dated 21.8.2014, the office of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) provided a copy of the impugned order dated 2.1.2013 which was received by the applicant on 25.8.2014 and th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ce the Registry has raised the objection, therefore he had to file this application seeking condonation of delay. He has also the information under RTI from the department regarding the receipt of the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version