Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (2) TMI 120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in overlooking the concept of mutuality? (2) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in overlooking the fact that in the absence of any "real income" is it permissible to contend that the interest credited is to be set off against interest paid, what is contemplated in Explanation (baa) is, any other interest/ commission income which are otherwise taxable as "business income" like interest earned from money-lending business etc., and not the interests from these fixed deposits? (3) Whether on a correct and proper interpretation of Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and application thereof to the facts and circum .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ibunal held that there is no mutual agreement between the bank and the assessee and that the income derived from the export business alone is eligible for deduction under Section 80HHC and not the incidental income from the export proceeds. The Tribunal, while holding that the deposits made with the Bank are for the convenience and benefit of the assessee with a view to derive higher income, concluded that the assessee is not entitled to deduction under Section 80HHC on the interest income. Hence, the above appeals by the appellant/assessee raising the substantial questions of law, as referred to earlier. 3. In K.S.Subbiah Pillai and Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income-tax [(2003) 260 I.T.R. 304],(Mad) where the iss .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... its with the Bank should be treated as part of the income from business was negatived by the assessing officer, as also by the Commissioner, but was upheld by the Tribunal, on a reference, this Court while answering the question in favour of the Revenue, held as follows:- " the interest paid by the assessee to the bank, was no doubt, an item of expenditure in the computation of its business income. That, however, would not justify taking the income that the assessee received by way of interest on the deposits that it had with the bank, as part of its business income when in reality it was not. The deposit made with the bank was for the convenience and benefit of the assessee with a view to derive higher interest income. It was not a de .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates