TMI Blog2006 (11) TMI 644X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the application for review filed in respect of the order in CWP No.17615 of 2001 which was dismissed on 12.8.2005. The said writ petition was dismissed on the ground that the writ petitioner was absent for about three years. The High Court found the writ petitioner to be a habitual absentee and, therefore, felt that he did not deserve ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... spondents submitted that the High Court has rightly held that the review petition was not maintainable. Challenge in this appeal is only to the order passed in the review application. Such an appeal is not maintainable. In Shanker Motiram Nale v. Shiolalsing Gannusing Rajput [(1994) 2 SCC 753] it was observed as follows: The appeal is obviously incompetent. It is against an order of a Di ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
