GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (1) TMI 1015 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (1) TMI 1015 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2016 (42) S.T.R. 541 (Tri. - Del.) - Mandap Keeper services - appellants had availed exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-ST dated 20.6.2003 - short payment of service tax - It is urged by the counsel that prior to this amendment, marriage being a religious function would not fall into the category of social function mentioned in the definition - Held that:- . It is seen that though appellant had pleaded this ground before the authority below, the same .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essary implies that marriages having taint of religious function was outside the purview of definition of Mandap Keeper prior to 16.5.2007. However, the plea has to be established by the appellant by documentary evidence that the functions conducted during the period was marriage functions and not subject to levy of service tax. We therefore, are of the considered opinion that this is a fit case for remand. - In view thereof, the case is remanded to the adjudicating authority for de novo adj .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

istered with the service tax department. On perusal of ST-3 returns for the period 1.4.2005 to 31.3.2006 it was observed that appellants had availed exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-ST dated 20.6.2003. The department entertained the view that appellants have wrongly availed the exemption and therefore a show cause notice was issued raising the above allegation proposing to demand the short paid amount of ₹ 5,49,729/- along with interest and penalty. After adjudication the original .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rroneously denied the same. Secondly, that majority of the functions conducted in the Mandap/ Hotel were marriage functions and that no service tax was leviable for such functions being religious functions. 3. The learned counsel adverted to the definition of Mandap Keeper and also relied on the CESTAT judgment in CCE Mangalore Vs. Krishnapur Mutt, 2003 (157) ELT 182 (Tri-Bang). The definition of Mandap Keeper as it stood during the relevant period is as under: Section 65 (67) of the Finance Act .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version