Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. R.K. Enterprises Versus The Income Tax Officer

Non deduction of tds u/s 194C - payments made to the labourers. - Held that:- We find no merit in the submissions of the assessee that the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act are applicable only to the amounts which are outstanding or remaining payable at the end of every year i.e. 31st March. The Pune Bench of Tribunal has consistently taken a view that the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act are applicable to the amounts irrespective of whether the same were paid during the year .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

BR>
Addition u/s 68 - cash credit - Held that:- The perusal of the balance sheet filed by the assessee reflects that the closing balance as on 31.03.2007 was ₹ 2,42,500/- i.e. the amount due to Durvesh Construction Co. The case of the assessee before us is limited that it had received sum of ₹ 5 lakhs from M/s. Durvesh Construction Co., out of which sum of ₹ 2,57,500/- was the loan due from the said person and the balance of ₹ 2,42,500/- was the loan outstanding at t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessee. However, in respect of balance of ₹ 2,42,500/-, the assessee has failed to discharge his onus i.e. to establish the creditworthiness of the person advanced the loan. Accordingly, we direct the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance to ₹ 2,42,500/- Decided partly in favour of assessee.

Addition being difference in receipts - Held that:- The assessee claims to have booked the balance sale consideration in subsequent assessment year. Though the assessee i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on - Decided against assessee - ITA No. 277/PN/2014 - Dated:- 27-1-2016 - Ms. Sushma Chowla, JM And Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia, AM For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Shri Dheeraj Kumar Jain ORDER Per Sushma Chowla, JM This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of CIT(A)-I, Thane, dated 17.10.2013 relating to assessment year 2007-08 against order passed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act ). 2. Despite service of notice, none appeared on behalf o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ission paid on the alleged ground that the said payment is covered u/s 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Reasons given by A.O. for confirming disallowance of ₹ 1,58,050/- out of the total disallowance of ₹ 1,58,050/- by applying the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) in respect of commission paid on the alleged ground that the said payment is covered u/s 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are wrong insufficient and contrary to the facts and evidence on record. 3. In the facts and circ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lleged ground that the said payment is covered u/s 194C of the II1C9Jne Tax 1961, are wrong insufficient and contrary to the facts and evidence on record. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition made by the A.O. by treating a sum of ₹ 2,01,884 as a deemed dividend and thereby adding the same to the total income within the meaning of Sec 2(22)(e). 6. Reasons given by the learned CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Sec 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 8. Reasons given by the CIT(A) for confirming the disallowance made by A.O. of ₹ 5,00,000/- being loan taken from Durvesh Construction Company and treating the same as unexplained cash credit by invoking the provisions of Sec 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are wrong insufficient and contrary to the facts and evidence on record. 9. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming disallowance made by A.O. of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rise of demand. 4. In respect of grounds of appeal No.1 and 2 raised by the assessee, there is noting on one of earlier hearing that the grounds of appeal No.1 and 2 are not pressed. In any case, the issue raised vide grounds of appeal No.1 and 2 is against the disallowance of ₹ 1,58,050/- for non-deduction of tax out of commission paid. By applying provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, the said amount was disallowed for non-deduction of TDS. In view of the assessee having not presse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the said amounts were subjected to tax deduction at source and because of non-deduction, the amounts were not allowable under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 6. Briefly, in the facts of the present case, the assessee was a partnership firm carrying the business of builders & developers in and around Panvel area. The Assessing Officer during the course of assessment proceedings noted from the details of salary and wages that in includes labour charges of ₹ 17,55,902/- to the labour and &# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s should not be made. The learned Authorized Representative for the assessee agreed for the disallowance and an addition of ₹ 8,17,741/- was made in the hands of assessee. 7. The CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer dismissing the plea of the assessee that relief was allowable since tax deduction provisions were not applicable in respect of the amounts already paid, but were applicable only on the amount which was payable at the end of the year. 8. Though the assessee d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ly taken a view that the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act are applicable to the amounts irrespective of whether the same were paid during the year or were outstanding at the close of the year. In the absence of any justification for non-deduction of TDS out of sub-contract payments and in view of admission of the assessee before the Assessing Officer, we uphold the addition of ₹ 8,17,741/-. The grounds of appeal No.3 and 4 raised by the assessee are thus, dismissed. 10. The issue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e) of the Act and since the company M/s. R.K. Group Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. had reserves and surplus as on 31.03.2007 amounting to ₹ 2,01,884/-, the loan to the extent of ₹ 2,01,884/- was added as income of the assessee. 12. The CIT(A) upheld the order of Assessing Officer, against which the assessee is in appeal. 13. On perusal of the written submissions filed by the assessee, we find that there was an outstanding closing balance of ₹ 14,79,043/- of loan taken by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nership firm, but is not a registered shareholder of the said private limited company, only its partners were the shareholders / directors of the said company. The learned Authorized Representative for the assessee in the written submissions has made reference to the decision of Mumbai Special Bench of Tribunal in ACIT Vs. Bhumik Colour Pvt. Ltd. reported in 27 SOT 17 and pointed out that the provisions of section 2(22)(e) of the Act are applicable only in the hands of the person, who is the sha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the issue, the assessee had received sum of ₹ 5 lakhs from Mr. S.R. Sharma, sole proprietor of Durvesh Construction Co. The assessee furnished loan confirmation of the said party and pointed out before the Assessing Officer that though during the year, the assessee had received loan of ₹ 5 lakhs but the said amount was adjusted towards opening loan balance of ₹ 2,57,500/-, which was taken by Mr. S.R. Sharma in earlier years and balance of ₹ 2,42,500/- was shown at the clo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder section 68 of the Act. 16. Before the CIT(A), the claim of the assessee was that though it had received sum of ₹ 5 lakhs from Mr. S.R. Sharma, but sum of ₹ 2,57,500/- was adjusted against the loan outstanding and the balance amount of ₹ 2,42,500/- was loan taken during the year. The submissions of the assessee were forwarded to the Assessing Officer, who in his remand report dated 04.03.2013 stated that though the assessee in the remand proceedings claimed that he would pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aid person, hence, merits to be upheld. The CIT(A) rejected the explanation of the assessee, in view of the remand report and also did not accept the alternate plea of the assessee that the addition should be restricted to ₹ 2,42,500/-, since the assessee had failed to bring on record any evidence to show when the loan was advanced to Mr. S.R. Sharma and whether the same was reflected in assessee s books of account or not. Accordingly, addition of ₹ 5 lakhs was confirmed. 17. On peru .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

which it is reflected that the opening balance of loan account of Durvesh Construction Co. was debit balance of ₹ 2,57,500/- and ₹ 5 lakhs was transacted during the year and the closing balance as on 31.03.2007 was ₹ 2,42,500/-, copy of the said letter is placed at page 33 of the Paper Book. Further, a letter dated 29.12.2009 is also placed on record, in which there is no reference to the said loan transaction. The perusal of the balance sheet filed by the assessee, which is p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hs from the said person and had only shown the balance of ₹ 2,42,500/- in the balance sheet. In the above said facts and circumstances, where the assessee had advanced sum of ₹ 2,57,500/- in the preceding year to Mr. S.R. Sharma, proprietor of M/s. Durvesh Construction Co., then to the extent of said amount, loan is explained as the creditworthiness can be accepted to the extent of amount which was advanced by the assessee. However, in respect of balance of ₹ 2,42,500/-, the as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

see noted that as against the amount declared by the assessee and sales as per agreement value of different transactions varied, sum of ₹ 67,500/- was not taken by the assessee for the purpose of sale. When confronted, the learned Authorized Representative for the assessee submitted that the said amount was offered to taxation in the next year, but the assessee failed to furnish the documentary evidence in this regard and hence, the same was added to the income of the assessee. 20. The CIT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: Duty Drawback & Input Credit - under GST

Highlight: Addition u/s 23(1)(a) - deemed rent - once the property is let out and at any point of time this remained vacant during the same cannot be brought to tax under the head House properties income.

News: Haryana constitutes screening committee on anti-profiteering

Highlight: Valuation of imported goods - it is necessary to re-examine the matter of both license agreement as well as supply contract simultaneously, to see if the enhanced royalty was in the guise of adjustment of the price of components.

Forum: Input tax credit

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

Highlight: Cenvat credit availed on Club Membership for the Director is not admissible as it cannot be said to be remotely connected with the activity of manufacture

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Manpower Service provider

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version