Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Interstate Syndicate Versus Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax, JSR

2016 (2) TMI 332 - CESTAT KOLKATA

Waiver of pre-deposit - Demand of service beyond the scope of show cause notice - though initially it was demanded in the SCN under the category of "Mining services", but in the adjudication order, the said demand was confirmed under 'Business Auxiliary Service' and GTA services. - Held that:- At this stage, it is difficult to accept the contention of the Revenue that discharge of service tax liability for the services rendered mostly in Orissa and partly in Jharkhand at Bhubaneswar, Odisha cann .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ice Tax Appeal No. ST/75218/2014 - Dated:- 9-12-2015 - D M Misra, Member (J) And H K Thakur, Member (T) For the Appellants : Sri K Kurmi & Sri R Sharma, Advs For the Respondent : Sri K Choudhari, Supdt. (AR) ORDER Per D M Misra Heard both sides. 2. This is an application seeking waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax of ₹ 78.83 Lakhs and equal amount of penalty imposed under Section 78 and penalties under other provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. 3. Assailing the impugned order, the Ld. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ey discharged subsequently after obtaining a separate Registration. It is his submission that the said stand of the Revenue is incorrect. Regarding the balance amount of ₹ 15.00 Lakhs, he submits that even though initially it was demanded in the SCN under the category of "Mining services", which came into force from 1/6/2007, but in the adjudication order, the said demand was confirmed under 'Business Auxiliary Service' and GTA services. It is his contention that the orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

39; and GTA Services, the Ld. A.R. submitted that it cannot be construed that the Ld, Commissioner has travelled beyond the scope of the order in as much in the reply to the Notice rebutting the allegation of the Department, the applicant had claimed that they are eligible to the benefit of Notification of 34/2004-ST dated 03/12/2004 and also applicability of Service Tax under 'Business Auxiliary Services', to the service rendered by them, which were not accepted by the adjudicating auth .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version