TMI Blog2013 (11) TMI 1626X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d grant stay for a period of six months or the completion of hearing of the appeal whichever is earlier. - S.A. No.311/Mum/2013 (Arising out of ITA No.8290/Mum/2011) - - - Dated:- 29-11-2013 - SHRI D.MANMOHAN, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI D.KARUNAKARA RAO, AM For the Petitioner : Shri Arpit Agarwal For the Respondent : Shri B Panda ORDER PER D.KARUNAKARA RAO, A.M : This Stay A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e issues raised in this case have an impact on the additions made in the case of the assessee. Narrating the reasons for adjournments, the counsel demonstrated that in all the times, the department sought adjournments, and, therefore, the appeal is not heard despite the cooperation of the assessee. Further he mentioned that considering the binding judgment of the Hon ble High Court in the case of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the reasons not attributable to the assessee. Therefore, we are of the opinion that it is a fit case for further extension of time. Accordingly, we allow the Stay Application filed by the assessee and grant stay for a period of six months or the completion of hearing of the appeal No.8290/M/2011, whichever is earlier. 6. Resultantly, Stay Application of the assessee is allowed Order pronounc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
