Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2014 (4) TMI 1113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e that the investments have been made from out of the interest-free funds available with it. Hence, no disallowance out of the interest expenditure is called for in terms of S.14A of the Act, by estimating such interest expenditure as attributable to the amounts of investment. In this view of the matter, we do not find any justification for the addition sustained by the CIT(A). We accordingly delete the addition of ₹ 1 lakh sustained by the CIT(A) - Decided in favour of assessee Disallowance of provision for contingencies (NPAs) u/s. 36(2)(viia) - AO made such disallowance, observing that such a provision made by the Assessing Officer is not an allowable deduction - Held that:- As already noted the CIT(A) has merely set aside the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for verifying the contention of the assessee that the amount towards contingencies(NPA), figured only by way of below the line adjustments against the profit of the year determined, in the Profit & Loss Appropriation Account. Since the CIT(A) himself has deleted the addition, subject to verification of the claim of the assessee in that behalf, assessee cannot have any grievance against the order of the C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tributable to the dividend income which is exempt from tax, facts, in brief, are that in terms of S.14A of the Act, the Assessing Officer while making the assessment noted that the assessee has certain interest bearing loans from various related (share holders) persons and interest is paid on these borrowings. The Assessing Officer also asked the assessee furnished the details of expenditure incurred by the assessee for earning the dividend income. In response, assessee submitted that no expenditure was incurred for the purpose of earning the dividend income, and no specialised staff was exclusively created for the purpose of making investments, and the expenditure that is normally incurred for its regular business activities, is considered even for earning dividend income. Not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee, considering the volume of investments in the shares/mutual funds, which is very high, and observing that certain amount of expenditure incurred by the assessee even in the normal course of business is definitely attributable to the earning of dividend income, which is claimed as exempt from tax, the Assessing Officer made an estimated disallowance of ₹ 10 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... exempt income and does not refer to a deemed or assumed spending for the purpose. The section cannot be taken beyond this to attribute by some yardstick, every item of expenditure which has no apparent connection or earning of the tax free income. He also relied on Balarampur Chini Mills Vs/ Dy. CIT(ITA 504/Kol/2011, wherein it has been held by the Kolkata Bench of the tribunal that the interest expenditure which is directly relatable to the any particular income or receipt is not to be considered under Rule 8D(2)(ii) The Assessing Officer has to show that the interest is not directly attributable to any particular income or receipt and also since the assessee has substantial capital and reserves, the interest on loans cannot be included under Rule 8D(2)(ii). The learned counsel relied on the following decisions for the proposition that S.14A cannot be applied where interest free funds are available. (a) CIT V/s UTI Bank Ltd. (ITA no.2572/Ahd/2006 and ors)-Trib (b) Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. Ors. (2011 )237 CTR 164(Ker.) (c) DCIT V/s. Maharashtra Seamless Ltd. (2011) (16 Taxman 97)-Del He submitted that the provisions of S.14A cannot be applied in case of com .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... presumption that certain expenditure must have been incurred, by resorting to estimation of such expenditure. For bringing any interest expenditure claimed by the assessee under the ambit of Rule 8D(2)(ii) the Assessing Officer has to show that the said interest is not directly attributable to any particular income or receipt. We find that the assessee in this case, has substantial reserves, and therefore, we find merit in the contention of the assessee that the investments have been made from out of the interest-free funds available with it. Hence, no disallowance out of the interest expenditure is called for in terms of S.14A of the Act, by estimating such interest expenditure as attributable to the amounts of investment. In this view of the matter, we do not find any justification for the addition sustained by the CIT(A). We accordingly delete the addition of ₹ 1 lakh sustained by the CIT(A) and allow the ground of the assessee on this issue. 9. As for the next ground relating to disallowance of provision for contingencies (NPAs) u/s. 36(2)(viia) of the Act, amounting to ₹ 8,90,207, the Assessing Officer made such disallowance, observing that such a provision made .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... observing that interest had definitely accrued on the securities and as per the mercantile system of accounting this interest had to be brought to tax, and further observing that he assessee has not provided any evidence to show that nothing had accrued to it, confirmed the addition of ₹ 3,42,198 made by the Assessing Officer. 15. Aggrieved, assessee preferred this second appeal before us. 16. The learned counsel for the assessee, reiterating the contentions urged before the Revenue authorities submitted that the assessee has already accounted for interest accrued on IDBI bonds at 6.20% amounting to ₹ 62,849. However, for the other funds, they have to be valued at costs or NRV whichever is lower. The investments in Non-FLR investments in the category of Available For Sale investments valued at costs or NRV whichever is lower by following the accounting principles which are being in vogue for many years. These funds are not at any fixed interest to accrue. The statutory compliance that investments have to be valued by the assessee on RBI guidelines is satisfied. As for the accounting policy of the bank, investments in mutual funds is stated at cost and provisions i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates