Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Dy. Director of Income tax (Intl. Taxation) Versus Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. And Vica-Versa

2016 (3) TMI 117 - ITAT MUMBAI

Section 44 BBB applicability to the remittance made to Atomstroyexport(ASE) - whether all the payments were in the nature of 'fees for technical services' that same were liable to tax in India? - Intergovernmental- Agreement - Held that:- Income-tax proceedings the doctrine of res judicata is not applicable but consistency and definiteness has to be maintained unless there is a manifest distinguishable feature. We find that the FAA, while passing orders in subsequent proceedings, brought any dis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rd to introduction of section 44BB is not at all convincing. International transactions are governed by the DTAA. s. and Inter-govermental Agreements. Considering the above discussion, we are of the opinion that the appeals filed by the assessee have to be allowed. Therefore, revising the orders of the FAA, we decide the effective grounds of appeal in favour of the assessee. - ITA No. 6394/Mum/08, ITA No. 733-35/Mum/11, ITA No. 931/Mum/11 - Dated:- 12-2-2016 - Sh. Rajendra, Accountant Member And .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ember 3, 1987 and is a wholly owned Government of India enterprise. It is engaged in the business of generation of power from nuclear energy and was also in the process of setting up nuclear power stations in India in various locations. The Republic of India and the then Union of Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR) had entered into an agreement dated November 20, 1988 for co-operation in the construction of a Nuclear Power Station in India. A supplementary agreement dated June 20, 1988 was entered .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

co-operation to be provided by the Russian Organisation, the appellant has entered into following Contract: (a) Off shore Service Contract ( OSC dated December 17, 2001) (b) Contract dated August 23, 2002 'For Deputation of the Contractor's Specialist at Site'. In the orders passed, under section 195(2)of the Act, on 12-07-2006 the AO held that the provisions of section 44 BBB of the Act did not apply to the remittance made by the appellant to Atomstroyexport(ASE), that all the paym .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that had been entered by the appellant and ASE were to be read in the backdrop of the Intergovernmental- Agreement and not in isolation, that consolidating reading would bring out the true character of the transaction, that Article 11 of the Intergovernmental agreement read with the supplementary agreement indicated that ASE was to provide necessary assistance to the assessee for setting up a Nuclear Power Station in India, that the provision of section 44BBB has to be applied in respect of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

construction of the nuclear power station, that ASE had prepared detailed project report (DPR) prepared and had submitted to the Government of Republic of India for its review and final decision with regard to the implementation of the project. After considering the submissions of the assessee and the order of the AO, passed u/s. 195(2)of the Act, the FAA took notice of the fact that identical issue had been decided by his predecessor on four occasions in favour of the assessee. Following the s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

her any appeal against the above mentioned earlier orders were filed or not before the Tribunal. In these circumstances, it has to be reasonably presumed that the issue had attained finality as the AO had not challenged the orders of the FAA. s. We find that the FAA had analysed the agreements entered into by the assessee with its Russian Counterpart and had taken a holistic view. Both the organizations are governed by the Inter governmental Agreement. ASE had not only provided necessary assista .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

we decide the effective ground of appeal against the AO. ITA/733-35 & 931/Mum/2011: 5. In the appeals filed by the assessee the FAA had endorsed the order of the AO. s. who had held that the provisions of section 44BBB were not applicable with regard to the job undertaken by ASE, that the assessee payment made by the assessee was in nature of royalty. The AO directed the assessee to deduct tax @10% for the payments made to ASE. The FAA, during the appellate proceedings, observed that the nu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion and training of employees and do not cover the whole power project, that reliance placed by the appellant company on the inter governmental agreement between- India and USR dated 20-11-1988 was not fully acceptable, that section 44BBB was introduced in the Act by Finance Act, 1989 w. e. f 01-04-1990 and at the time of signing of inter-government agreements, Section 44BBB was not even in existence. He further observed that the principle of res-judicata as codified in the section 11 of Code of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cata were not applicable to the Income tax proceedings, that the facts and circumstances were identical to the facts of earlier orders passed by his predecessors, as mentioned at paragraph 4 of our order. As there were no new facts on record, he should not have taken a contrary view. We are of the opinion that where a fundamental aspect continuing during the different assessment years is found as a fact one way or the other and the parties have allowed that position to be sustained by not challe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

separate and distinct, nevertheless where facts are identical from year to year, there has to be uniformity and in treatment. On an earlier occasion in the case of Gopal Purohit(336 ITR 287), the Hon ble Court has held that that there should be uniformity in treatment and when facts and circumstances for different years were identical particularly in the case of the same assessee. The Hon ble Delhi High Court has in the case of Galileo Nederland BV, (367 ITR 319), observed as under: Decision on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

id the following principle with regard to consistency of approach in judicial matters: The totality of the circumstances and their combined effect are to be taken into consideration while deciding the question as to whether or not a particular fact is proved. Neither the principle of res judicata nor the rule of estoppel is applicable to the assessment proceedings, yet the rule of consistency does apply to such proceedings. We would like to discuss the matter Neo Poly Pack (P. )Ltd. (245 ITR 492 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version