Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Nai Rajdhani Path Pramandal Versus Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -II, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Patna

2016 (3) TMI 246 - PATNA HIGH COURT

Recovery of demand - attachment of account whereas the appeal was pending - AO refused to grant stay - non deduction of TDS - a proceeding under Section 201(1) read with Section 201(1A) - Held that:- In the light of the proviso to Clause (b) of subsection (1) of Section 201 of the Act, there can be no escape from the conclusion that if the person, who fails to deduct, whole or part of the tax, at source, shall not be deemed to be an assessee in default if in respect of such tax, the deductee has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndent No.2, namely, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Patna, is duty bound to take up the appeal at the earliest and if it is found that the taxes, which were to be deducted, at source, by the present petitioner while making payment to the said two Corporations, have been paid by the said two Corporations as deductees, the impugned demands, raised by the respondent No.2, namely, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Patna, shall be set aside and the attachment of the account of the pet .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act, 1961 ((hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), instituted against the petitioner, which is a department of the State Government, constituted to construct and maintain roads and bridges in the State of Bihar, the respondent No. 3 herein, namely, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Patna, held that the petitioner had not deducted income tax, at source, on the payments made to Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Limited and Bihar State Road Development Corporation Limited ((here .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ayments, made to Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Limited and Bihar State Road Development Corporation Limited, are in the nature of allotments of funds to the said Corporations, on the instructions of the Government of Bihar, for the purposes of construction of roads and bridges and that the same did not constitute a contract for work under Section 194(1) of the Act. 3. Having preferred an appeal, as indicated above, accompanied by an application for stay of the demand so raised, before the respond .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

respondent No.2, namely, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Patna, the respondent No.3, namely, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Patna, attached the accounts of the petitioner maintained with the District Treasury Officer, Patna, for recovery of the whole amount, in dispute, totaling to a sum of ₹ 1,18,58,89,226/-. 4. Though the appeal is still pending for consideration by the respondent No.2, namely, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Patna, this writ applicat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppearing for the petitioner, and Ms. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, learned Counsel, appearing for the respondents. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the correctness or the otherwise of the substantial questions of law, which have been raised by the writ petitioner including the question as to whether the payments made by the petitioner to the Corporations were in the nature of payment of contract or simple disbursement of amount on behalf of the State Government, we may point out that it has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and, in terms of the assessments made, taxes have also been paid by the two Corporations, and since the taxes, due from Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Limited and Bihar State Road Development Corporation Limited, have already been received by the Income Tax Department, the Income Tax Department ought not to proceed against the present petitioner under Section 201(1) read with Section 201(1A) of the Act, and, therefore, the petitioner's account ought not to have been attached and ought to be, n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the assessments, made by the said two Corporations, the Corporations have already paid taxes, is it legally valid and justified for the respondents to continue to keep under attachment the account of the petitioner maintained with the District Treasury Officer, Patna, for the purposes of recovery of the said sum of ₹ 1,18,58,89,226/-? 9. Our quest for an answer to the above questions brings us to the Circular No.275/201/95-IT(B), dated 29.01.1997, which states, " ….. &helli .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

have reproduced above, clearly shows that no demand, as envisaged by Section 201(1) of the Act, can be enforced against the deductor if the tax, due to be paid by the deductee, has already been paid by the deductee. In other words, if the deductor (i.e., the petitioner herein), who has to make deduction at source of the payments made to the deductee (i.e., the Corporations) failed to make the deduction, will the deductor, i.e., the petitioner herein, remains liable to make the payment of the tax .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pointing out, in Hindustan Coca Cola Beverate P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, reported in, [2007] 293 ITR 226 (SC), that when there is no dispute that the tax due has already been paid by the deductee-assessee, a proceeding, under Section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, read with Section 201(1A) thereof, is untenable and, therefore, cannot be continued against the deductor. 12. Giving the Circular, dated 29.01.1997 aforementioned, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, a statuto .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rt of the tax, as required by or under this Act, then, such person, shall, without prejudice to any other consequences which he may incur, be deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of such tax: 1[Provided that any person, including the principal officer of a company, who fails to deduct the whole or any part of the tax in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter on the sum paid to a resident or on the sum credited to the account of a resident shall not be deemed to be an assessee i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fficer is satisfied that such person, without good and sufficient reasons, has failed to deduct and pay such tax.]" 13. In the light of the proviso to Clause (b) of subsection (1) of Section 201 of the Act, there can be no escape from the conclusion that if the person, who fails to deduct, whole or part of the tax, at source, shall not be deemed to be an assessee in default if in respect of such tax, the deductee has furnished his return of income under Section 139 of the Act and, while fur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version