Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2011 (7) TMI 1185

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 3. The facts of the case are that the AO imposed penalty under Section 271(1)(c) on the following expenses sustained by the CIT(A) and confirmed by the ITAT: i) Shortage expenses : ₹ 3,39,078/- ii) Tanker Diesel Expenses : ₹ 6,00,000/- iii) Transport Expenses : ₹ 10,00,000/- The CIT(A) cancelled the penalty with the following observations: 6. I have considered the contentions of the appellant as well as the penalty order. The following observations are made with respect to the facts of the case: The penalty has been levied on the disallowance of expenses claimed under three heads on estimate basis. The concealment of income has not been proved conclusively to any extent, in any of any of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the learned counsel for the assessee contended that the assessee has furnished all the required details and offered explanation during the assessment proceedings, which were not found to be false or bogus. The additions were made by the AO purely on the basis of estimate which were reduced in appeal. That the disallowance of expenses on estimated basis does not amount to concealment of income for which penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be levied. The learned counsel also relied on the decision in the case of CIT Vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd., 322 ITR 158 (SC) to support its claim that incorrect claim does not tantamount to furnishing in accurate particulars. The learned DR, on the other hand, relied upon the order of the AO. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cument where the assessee can furnish the particulars of his income. When such particulars are found to be inaccurate, the liability would arise. To attract penalty, the details supplied in the return must not be accurate, not exact or correct, not according to the truth or erroneous. Where there is no finding that any details supplied by the assessee in its return are found to be incorrect or erroneous or false there is no question of inviting the penalty under section 271(1)(c). A mere making of a claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars regarding the income of the assessee. Such a claim made in the return cannot amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars. From the abo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates