GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (3) TMI 442 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2016 (3) TMI 442 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT - TMI - Writ petition - Legality, validity and vires of Notification No.24/2007 dated 22.5.2007 and circular No.98/1/2008-ST dated 04.01.2008 - Service tax levied on the “renting of immovable property” as oppose to service tax on a service provided “in relation to renting of immovable property” - Section 65 (90a) and Section 65 (105 (zzz)) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2007 errorneously interpreted - Held that:- the issue involved is no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e the Apex Court was also rejected. - Matter disposed of - SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12268, 12269, 12270 of 2009 - Dated:- 4-3-2016 - MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY AND MR. ANANT S. DAVE, JJ. FOR THE PETITONER : MR ARPIT A KAPADIA, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT : MR YN RAVANI, ADVOCATE, RULE SERVED ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE) 1. By way of these writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners beg to challenge the legality, validity and vires .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be levied on the renting of immovable property as oppose to service tax on a service provided in relation to renting of immovable property . The petitioner also seeks an appropriate writ, order or direction from this Hon ble Court not restrain the respondents from charging service tax on the renting of immovable property and also seeks further appropriate writ, order or direction to direct the respondents to refund the service tax paid by the petitioners on the renting of immovable property. 2. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ause (105) of Section 65 of Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Section 75(5)(h) and Section 76 of the Finance Act, 2010 came to be rejected and even SLP preferred before the Apex Court was also rejected, these petitions are heard together and disposed of by this common judgement. 3. That in earlier writ petition in the case of Cinemax India Limited (supra) basic facts were recorded as under: 2. In most of the petitions, the petitioners are tenants paying rents or license fees or business conducting .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

During the course of their operation, the petitioner companies also receive rent or license fess or conducting fees or leasing, licensing or use of immovable properties. In these cases also, wherever agreements so provide, the petitioner companies get reimbursed in respect of dues for electricity, water, housekeeping, security etc., which are based on actual consumption and duly supported by bills. 4. The Finance Act, 2007 amended Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994 and defined renting of immova .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ss or commerce'. 5. By Notification No.24/2007-S.T., dated 22nd May, 2007, the effective date for levy of service tax on renting and leasing an immovable property was notified as 1st June, 2007. According to the petitioners, the entire object and purpose of the service tax provision was to tax certain categories of services in relation to renting of any immovable property for use in the course or furtherance of business or commerce. Thus, according ot the petitioners, what the Revenue sought .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng his property to another person. 6. By circular No.98/1/2008-S.T., dated 4th January, 2008, the Ministry of Finance, Government of India authorised proceeding of recovery of service tax on the same assumption that renting out of immovable property was by itself a service. 4. After relying on various case laws and provisions of Finance Act, this Court in paragraphs 44 and 45 held as under: 44. For the reasons aforesaid, while upholding Section 65(105) (zzzz) of Finance Act, 1994 as amended by S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version