Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Indian Steel & Allied Products Versus CC (Port - Import) , Chennai

2016 (3) TMI 554 - CESTAT CHENNAI

Reduction of Redemption fine and penalty imposed - In lieu of confiscation - Appellant accepted enhancement of value and Pre-shipment inspection certificate produced was not in consonance - Held that:- the importer have attempted to comply with the statutory conditions prescribed in the handbook of procedures under the Foreign Trade Policy regarding import of scraps, though the certificate produced, as a pre-shipment inspection certificate, was not accepted by the department and also by the Adju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion imposed are reduced from ₹ 5,09,000/- to ₹ 50,000/- and penalty penalty from ₹ 1,30,000/- to ₹ 30,000/-. - Decided in favour of appellant - C/357/2005 - Final Order No. 41841 / 2015 - Dated:- 26-10-2015 - SHRI R. PERIASAMI, TECHNICAL MEMBER AND SHRI P. K. CHOUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER For the Petitioner : Ms. Sridevi, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri K.P. Muralidharan, AC (AR) ORDER PER P. K. CHOUDHARY M/s Indian Steel & Allied Products, Chennai, the appellant herein, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0/- per metric ton (C&F) in the name of M/s Herms Chem Impex Pvt Ltd., Chennai. The goods were sold to the appellant on High Sea Sale for a consideration of 2% on the C&F value. The goods were shipped in seven consignments. The goods were subjected to first check examination and found to be as declared. The pre-shipment Inspection Certificate produced by the appellant was not in consonance with Annexure-1 to Appendix 28 of the Handbook of Procedures rendering the same unacceptable in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d accordingly, in his Order in Original, re-determined the price at U.S $ 290/- per M.T (C&F) for the 195.780 MTs of Re-Rollable Steel Scrap. The impugned goods were confiscated with an option for redemption on payment of ₹ 5,09,000/- under section 125(1) of the Customs Act 1962. A penalty of ₹ 1,30,000/- was also imposed under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. 3. Being aggrieved by the said order, the appellant preferred their present appeal and the matter was represented .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ess as given in the certificate and as found in the Appendix 28 which goes to show that the department s understanding is that while the Head Office of M/s Bureau Veritas was recognized as a designated inspection agency where branch is not so; that the quantum of final penalty is disproportionately on the higher side when compared to similar orders. 4. The department was represented by Shri K.P. Muralidharan, learned authorized representative, who reiterated the findings contained in the impugne .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version