Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ITO Ward-2 (3) , Vijayawada Versus M/s. Best Feeds

Tds u/s 194C - non deduction of tds on hamali charges paid to daily labourers employed by the assessee - assessee submitted that it has not deducted TDS, because there is no written contract entered into between any individual and the payment is made to individual labouers, therefore, no disallowance can be made by invoking the provisions of 40(a)(ia) - Held that:- On verification of the ledger accounts, it was noticed that the assessee has made the payments on weekly basis towards wages payment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ments are made through the mestri, the A.O. was not correct in coming to the conclusion that there exist written or oral contract for supply of labour which attracts the provisions of section 194C of the Act. There is no contract between the mestri and the assessee, as such these payments are not covered under the provisions of section 194C of the Act, therefore the A.O. was not correct in disallowing the amounts by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The CIT(A) after consid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in cash. Though assessee claimed to have furnished the relevant details before the A.O. with regard to the sources for the credits in capital account, the A.O. could not had an occasion to verify the same, because the books of assessee were not available at the time of assessment. It is an admitted fact that the books of assessee were not before the A.O. to verify the sources of the credits in capital account. Unless, the A.O. satisfied himself about the source with reference to assessee books .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-2-2016 - SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri I. Sarish Kumar, DR For The Respondent : Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR ORDER PER G. MANJUNATHA, Accountant Member: This appeal filed by the revenue, is directed against the order of CIT(A), Vijayawada dated 14.2.2013 and it pertains to the assessment year 2008-09. 2. The brief facts of the case, are that the assessee is a partnership firm which is engaged in the business of processing of ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oceedings, the A.O. noticed that the assessee has debited an amount of ₹ 16,86,052/- towards hamali charges. On perusal of the details filed by the assessee, it was noticed that the hamali charges were paid to daily labourers employed by the assessee. Therefore, the A.O. asked to produce the bills & vouchers and TDS particulars for the hamali charges claimed in the P&L account. In response to notice, the assessee stated that it has employed daily labourers for handling the material .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

produce the bills & vouchers and TDS particulars for the same, the assessee has submitted that it has employed daily labourers for working in the factory premises and paid the wages on weekly/fortnightly basis. The assessee further submitted that it has not deducted TDS, because there is no written contract entered into between any individual and the payment is made to individual labouers, therefore, no disallowance can be made by invoking the provisions of 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The A.O., ho .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

introduced capital of ₹ 77,04,274/-. When asked to produce the sources for the capital introduced, the assessee stated that there is a search & seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act, in the case of assessee and its group concerns and all the books of accounts and other details were seized by the department. However, the assessee has furnished the personal books of accounts of the partner of the firm Sri M. Surendra Nath and also explained the sources for the capital introduced. The asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

barred it is not possible to call for the explanations regarding the cash inflow into the capital account and hence it was proposed to add back to difference between the opening and closing balance of the capital account as unexplained credits. 4. Aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). Before the CIT(A), the assessee submitted that during the year the firm has paid a sum of ₹ 16,86,052/- towards hamali charges. The assessee further submitted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lied the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and disallowed the amount which is not correct. 5. Similarly, the assessee has paid production charges of ₹ 20,82,228/- towards labour working in the factory in the production process. The assessee further submitted that these labourers were engaged in the factory premises to assist the production process and wages was paid on weekly/fortnightly basis. As per the custom, the payments were made to mestri, in turn the mestri has distributed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The A.O. without verifying the details furnished by the assessee, completed the assessment just because the assessment is time barred. The assessee further submitted that the sources for the capital introduced was explained by furnishing ledger account copies of the partner and also explained the sources for the capital by stating that the amount was drawn from various firms, wherein the partner was either proprietor or partner. When the source for the capital account was explained, the A.O. was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y disallowed the amounts u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Similarly, the CIT(A), deleted addition made towards capital account by holding that when the sources for the capital was explained and also from which concern money have flown into the individual hands were produced before the A.O., the A.O. could have discharged his onus in rejecting the same by bringing cogent materials on record, which was not done. In addition, as rightly contended by the A.R. if at all the sources in the individual hands o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ht to have sustained the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act towards hamali charges of ₹ 16,86,052/- and production charges of ₹ 20,82,288/-, as the payments were made to a single person for supply of labour from time to time which is evident from the vouchers produced before the A.O. The Ld. D.R. further submitted that the CIT(A) was erred in deleting the addition by stating that there is no written contract between the mestri and the assessee, since there exist an oral contract b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessee has failed to furnish sources for the cash credits in capital account therefore, the A.O. has rightly made the additions. The Ld. D.R. further submitted that the CIT(A) erred in holding that the A.O. should have discharged his onus in rejecting the same by bringing cogent material on record which was not done as the assessee did not discharged initial burden cast upon it. Therefore, the additions made by the A.O. should be upheld. 9. On the other hand, the Ld. A.R. of the assessee st .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bourers employed in the assessee s firm. Therefore, the A.O. was not correct in invoking the provisions of section 194C of the Act, thereby disallowing the amounts u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The A.R. further submitted that as far as the production charge is concerned, this is also similar payment made to the daily labourers for working in the factory premises for handling the materials. These payments are made to the labourers through a mestri, in turn the mestri has paid the amount to the indivi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the credits in capital account. The A.R. further submitted that the assessee has submitted ledger account copies from the books of both, the partner and the firm and also produced the personal books of the partners to confirm the source for credits in capital account. The A.O. without considering the material and explanations of the firm has made additions towards unexplained credits on the ground that the information is not available. The assessee further submitted that the partner is having s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot satisfied with the sources for credits in capital account, then, the additions can be made only in the hands of the partners, but not in the hands of the firm. Therefore, the order of CIT(A) should be upheld. 11. We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. The A.O. disallowed hamali charges and production charges by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The A.O. was of the opinion that the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y/fortnightly basis. The payments were made through the mestri for the sake of convenience. Therefore, it cannot be construed as work contract to invoke the provisions of section 194C of the Act. We find force in the arguments of the assessee for the reason that the assessee has furnished ledger account copies of hamali charges and production charges along with name and address of the persons to whom the payments were made. On verification of the ledger accounts, it was noticed that the assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, where there in unskilled work force. Just because the payments are made through the mestri, the A.O. was not correct in coming to the conclusion that there exist written or oral contract for supply of labour which attracts the provisions of section 194C of the Act. There is no contract between the mestri and the assessee, as such these payments are not covered under the provisions of section 194C of the Act, therefore the A.O. was not correct in disallowing the amounts by invoking the provisi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed the additions by holding that the assessee has furnished details with regard to the sources for the credits in capital account, therefore, the A.O. was not correct in adding the credits in the hands of the partnership firm. The CIT(A) was of the opinion that if at all the sources for the credits was not proved by the partners, then the same can be added in the hands of the partners, but not in the hands of the firm. It was the contention of the A.O. that the assessee has not furnished details .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version