Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Aurangabad Versus M/s Fine Packaging Pvt Ltd

Cenvat Credit allowability on the inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods or non dutiable goods - Held that:- We find that the facts of the case is not much in dispute inasmuch as the respondent have availed the credit on inputs which was used in the process of printing and lamination processes of the Polyester/BOPP Film and this activity was held to be non manufacture. - Cenvat Credit on the inputs cannot be denied as per the provisions of Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n, even if, activity does not amount to manufacture the credit is permissible. As per the above discussion, we are of the considered view that Cenvat Credit on the inputs used in the process which does not amount to manufacture, is admissible. - Decided in favour of assessee - Appeal No. E/12/2007, E/CO-78/07 - Final Order Nos. A/85574-85575/2016-WZB/EB, - Dated:- 19-1-2016 - Ramesh Nair, Member (J) And Raju, Member (T) For the Appellant : Shri Sanjay Hasija, Supdt. A.R. For the Respondent : Shr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and carrying out printing and lamination processes on the said film. Thereafter laminated films were slit to the required sizes and cleared to the customers on payment of duty. The respondent availed Cenvat Credit of duty paid on the Polyester/BOPP Film as well as other raw materials such as ink, adhesives, solvent etc. The department has proceeded to deny the Cenvat Credit on the ground that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s. Metlex (I) Pvt. Ltd. held that laminating/metalizing of du .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

grounds of appeal submits that Cenvat Credit on the inputs can only be allowed if the inputs are used in the manufacture of excisable goods. In the present case, it is un disputed that the inputs were used for the activity which is not amount to manufacture hence the credit is inadmissible. He placed reliance on the following judgments. (i) Bee Am Chemicals Ltd. vs. Commissioner of C. Ex, Raigad 2014(309) ELT 183 (Tri-Mumbai) (ii) Commissioner of C. Ex, Vs. Sheetal Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. 2015(315 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ustries Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central excise, Noida 2005 (184) ELT 49 (Tri-Del) (iii) Bharat Gears Ltd. vs. Commissioner of C. Ex, Mumbai III 1996 (87) ELT 668 (Tribunal) (iv) Aask Engineers vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune 1998 (97) ELT 99 (Tribunal) 4. We have carefully considered the submission made by both the sides. We find that the facts of the case is not much in dispute inasmuch as the respondent have availed the credit on inputs which was used in the process of printing and l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

8377; 28,38,345/- for payment of duty to the tune of ₹ 36.36 lakhs as reported by the Dy. Commissioner, Aurangabad which was not required to be paid. (iii) Credit thus was effectively reversed and revenue cannot ask for reversal of credit. (iv) Further Hon'ble Supreme Court in a case as reported in 2005 (179) ELT 276 (SC) has held that when credit amount allegedly wrongly availed is exactly equivalent to the amount of excise duty paid, the consequence is revenue neutral and demand on t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e particulars of such receipt in his records and shall be entitled to take CENVAT credit of the duty paid as if such goods are received as inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 and utilise this credit according to the said rules (2) If the process to which the goods are subjected before being removed does not amount to manufacture, the manufacturer shall pay an amount equal to the CENVAT credit taken under sub-rule (1) and in any other case the manufacturer shall pay duty on goods received .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version