Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shree Ramanuj Dyeing & Printing Mills Versus Commissioners of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax-Surat-I

2016 (3) TMI 803 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

Rectification of mistake - Tribunal while passing the order had not considered the earlier decision of the Tribunal in the case of Gautam Weaving Mills vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Belapur (2008 (1) TMI 771 - CESTAT, MUMBAI ) as is squarely applicable in the present case - Held that:- find that the Tribunal had given a finding that M/s. Gautam Weaving Mills (supra), even the period after 2004, in that case the appellants were engaged in the manufacture of grey fabrics and not the job work .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

would be involved.

In any event, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the Tribunal has no power to review its own order and it should not be done, while there is a long drawn process. Hence, do not find any merit in the application filed by the applicant. Rom application is rejected. - Application No : E/ROM/10003/2016 In Appeal No: E/1450/2011 - Order No. M/10048/2016 - Dated:- 1-2-2016 - MR. P.K. DAS, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) For the Petitioner : Shri K. I. Vyas, Advocate For the Responden .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bunal in the case of Gautam Weaving Mills (supra) is squarely applicable in the present case. He further submits that the Tribunal had taken into consideration that the decision of the Gautam Weaving Mills (supra) is after 2004. He further submits at para 7 of the Tribunal order, it was observed that the extended period of limitation would be invoked. He submits that the Tribunal had not considered that there is no requirement to submit endorsed invoices with the monthly ER-I return and referred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ase of Vimal Enterprises (Supra) the period of dispute is July 1994 to August 1994. In the case of Darshan Industries the period of dispute appears to be 1994. In the case of Gautam Weaving Mills (supra), even the period is after 2004, in that case the appellants were engaged in the manufacture of grey fabrics and not the job worker. In the case of Proctor and Gamble (supra), the Tribunal observed that the invoices were issued in the name M/s Standard Surfactants on account of M/s Procter and Ga .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version