Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri Mul Chand Malu Versus The Union of India And Others

Denial of fair opportunity - Held that:- Denial of a fair opportunity to the assessee through disclosure of appropriate reasons germane to the objective intended to be achieved, at the stage of show cause notice and therefore the consequential order(s) dated 31.8.2015 and 31.7.2015, are found to be unsustainable and the same are quashed. The matter is however remanded back to the respective Principal Commissioners of Income Tax, Guwahati-I and Guwahati-II, who may take fresh steps under Section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

: Mr. S. Sarma, Standing Counsel Writ Petition (C) No.5870/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.5871/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.5872/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.5845/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.5876/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.5879/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.6625/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.6626/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.6632/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.6657/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.6658/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.6659/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.6694/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.6686/2015 Writ Petition (C) No.6675/2015 W .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

SUMIT MALOO, MS. SHEWETA BAID, KUBER SECURITIES, S. M. PRODUCTS SHRI BAJRANG LAL MALOO, SON OF LATE SOHAN LAL MALOO, SHRI BHAWANI SHANKAR SHARMA, M/S. CHHATRA SINGH BAID & SONS (HUF), SHRI CHHATRA SINGH BAID, PRIYA FASHION WEAR PRIVATE LIMITED, VIKASH KUMAR MALU & SONS (HUF), JUDGMENT ( Hrishikesh Roy, J. ) Heard Mr. U.K. Borthakur, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. The respondents are represented by Mr. S. Sarma, the learned standing counsel for the Income Tax Departmen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

; WP(C) Nos.6689/2015], the show cause notice for transferring the case was issued on 29.7.2015 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Guwahati-2 and the said notice reads as under:- …………………………….. Sub: Notice u/s.127(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - transfer of your case from ACIT, Circle-4, Guwahati to DCIT, Central Circle-28, New Delhi-reg. Sir, The CCIT (Central), New Delhi has approved the proposal of investig .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

4, Guwahati to DCIT, Central Circle-28, New Delhi. You are hereby provided with an opportunity to represent your case either in person or through an authorized representative or by way of written submission, if any on 07.08.2015 at 10:00 AM at 2nd floor, Aayakar Bhawan, Christian Basti, G.S. Road, Guwahati-781005. In case of failure to comply with this notice, it will be presume that there is no objection to the proposed transfer of your case as above. Yours faithfully, (Vinay Kumar) Principal C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Search & Seisure cases ………………… Sir, 1. Your case is proposed to be transferred u/s. 127 of the Income-tax Act,1961 from the ACIT, Circle-2, Guwahati to the O/o. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-28, New Delhi. 2. Opportunity of being heard is hereby granted to furnish your comments on or before 30/07/2015. In case your comments are not received by 30/07/2015, it shall be presumed that you have no objection to transfe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d out of the jurisdiction of the income tax officer at Guwahati to the officer at New Delhi. 6. In their respective replies, the assessees contended that the reasons/grounds are not disclosed for transferring the cases to New Delhi in the show cause notice and accordingly request was made to convey the reason for the proposed action and further not to pass any order on the proposed transfer, without communication of the reasons. 7. Thereafter, without specifying any reason for the proposed actio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Revenue and therefore the following order will cover all the cases. 9.1 The learned counsel Mr. U.K. Borthakur for the petitioners refer to both show cause notices to contend that reasons are not disclosed to the assessee as to why their cases are required to be transferred to New Delhi. To be precise, if centralizing the case is the objective, it is not shown why all the cases could not be clubbed under one Income Tax Officer at Guwahati and why they needed to be transferred out of Guwahati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nkar Sharma vs. Union of India), where the deponent income tax officer stated that coordination of investigation is not required in this case and therefore the order under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act was recalled and the case of this assessee was re-transferred to the ITO-1(1), Guwahati. 9.3 According to the petitioners, the show cause notice without containing the real reason was defective and therefore the consequential hearing was a mere formality in the instant cases and they do not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Guwahati could have easily coordinated/centralized the assessment work, for all these litigants. 10.1. On the other hand Mr. S. Sarma, the learned standing counsel for the Income Tax Department submits that most of the assessees involved in the present cases are residents of Delhi and that is one of the reason for transferring these cases to the jurisdiction of the Delhi based Income Tax Officer. 10.2. The learned lawyer for the Revenue also submits that reasons for the impugned action are clear .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the assessees, violates the principle of Natural Justice. The issue was answered by the Apex Court by stating that when law requires reasons to be recorded in a particular order, which prejudicially affects the interest of any person, such order ceases to be simple administrative order and non-communication of reason in such order will infringe the principles of Natural Justice. 12. The Calcutta High Court in (1998) 233 ITR 0377 (Chotanagpur Industries Gases (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Incom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n is Rathi and Co. and Ramesh and Co. vs. Union of India reported in [2004] 267 ITR 295 (Gauhati) and therefore this case deserves careful consideration. The challenge here was to an order passed by the CIT, Guwahati-II, transferring the income tax and wealth tax cases of the petitioner from the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officers at Guwahati to the Assessing Officer in Calcutta. Here also, a prior notice was issued to the assessee before the cases were transferred. But unlike the cases that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntimation of the reason, for facilitating effective representation in the proceeding under Sub-Section (2) of Section 127 of the Income Tax Act. Therefore the decision in Rathi and Co. (Supra) should not detain us in the present cases. 14. When a notice under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act is issued, it must prima facie show due application of mind and reasons must also be disclosed so that an effective opportunity is provided to the affected party to respond to the show cause notice. The con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Section 127 of the I.T. Act is a quasi judicial order and it must be established that such order was passed upon due application of mind to the relevant facts having a bearing on the issue for invoking the powers under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act. Here we find that the competent authority acted at the request of the CCIT (Central), New Delhi and noticing the reversal of the stand in the WP(C) No.6675/2015, we can reasonably infer that proper application of mind by the competent authori .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a given situation, centralizing of the cases can be for a bonafide objective but the appropriate reason under the ratio of Ajantha Industries (Supra) must be disclosed in the notice itself and the failure to do so would vitiate the notice and also the transfer order, consequent upon that inadequate notice. 18. Furthermore, while centralizing the cases can be a good ground for invoking the powers under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, some reasons must be given by the Commissioner as to why, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version