GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 275 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (4) TMI 275 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2016 (344) E.L.T. 455 (Tri. - Del.) - Confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty - Mis-declaration of quantity of goods - Import of Gold, Platinum and Silver Jewellery (Plain) - Jewellery purchased in auction in Italy - Held that:- it is not a regular case of import of jewellery, the declarations in the bill of entry were made based upon the invoice issued by M/s Graser, Italy (exporter), which has the stamp of approval by the Court of Bassano Del Grapp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the appellant, the said factor cannot be made a ground either for confiscation of the goods or for imposition of penalty upon the appellant. - Decided in favour of appellant with consequential relief - Customs Appeal No. 622 of 2010 - Final Order No. 51057/2016 - Dated:- 16-3-2016 - MS. ARCHANA WADHWA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND SHRI B. RAVICHANDRAN, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Petitioner : Shri Vishwanath Shukla, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Ranjan Khanna, Authorized Representative (DR) ORDE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

officers also noticed a quantity of 197.59 gms. of jewellery in excess than the declared quantity. Accordingly, the entire consignment was seized on the reasonable belief that the goods were under valued. 3. Resultantly, investigations were undertaken and the statement of one of the Directors was recorded. It was deposed by the Director that the jewellery, in question, was purchased during auction of the same in Italy as the owner company M/s Graser had gone into liquidation. The official liquid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

auction purchase. 4. In the above backdrop, the appellants were issued show cause notice for enhancement of the value as also proposing confiscation of the goods and imposition of penalty. The said show cause notice culminated into the present impugned order passed by Commissioner vide which the value of the goods stand enhanced and the same stand confiscated with an option to the appellant to redeem on payment of redemption fine of ₹ 1,00,000/-. In addition, penalty of ₹ 50,000/- st .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

agreed at the time of bid i.e. almost one year ago was mentioned in the invoice No. 6 dated 30/06/2010 and the importer had declared the same value in the bill of entry. However, the Commissioner has not accepted the said value on the ground that as per Section 14 of the Customs Act, the value of the imported goods shall be the transaction value, i.e., the price actually paid or payable for the goods for delivery at the time and place of importation. He has observed that since the price of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ime and place of importation is in relation to the price paid or payable. If there is no dispute about the price actually paid, the same cannot be enhanced subsequently on account of time gap between the payment of consideration of the sale and the export of the goods. By drawing our attention to the Valuation Rules, its stand strongly argued before us that the said Rules are not applicable in as much as there is no reason to doubt the transaction value. As such, he prays for setting aside the i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on the facts. The Commissioner has accepted the appellant s stand that the value declared by the appellant is the actual value paid by them to the exporter of the goods. In fact, we find that there is ample evidence on record to show that the jewellery, in question, was purchased by the appellant in close bid auction through sale confirmation issued by the Court of Bassano Del Grappa, Italy. The said value stands rejected by the lower Authorities on a simple ground that the sale was concluded o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lue declared by the importer. In the absence of any doubt, it was not open to the Adjudicating Authority to reject the declared value. On the one hand, he himself is arriving at a finding that the goods were actually purchased by the appellant at the declared value and i.e. the price which stand paid by the appellant to their exporter. As such, there was no valid reasons for rejection of the transaction value. 8. Examining the provisions of Section 14 of the Customs Act, we find that the emphasi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fresh value has to be arrived at based upon the time at which the goods enter the Indian Territorial Borders. The reference to time is admittedly related to the price of the goods, which has either actually been paid or is required to be paid by the importer for delivery of the goods at a particular time of importation. In the absence of any doubt about the payment of the goods made by the appellant to their foreign exporter, we find no reasons to enhance the same on the sole ground that import .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ket will not require enhancement of the value. 10. It is also seen that there are findings by the lower Authorities on the jewellery being in excess of the declared quantum, by 197.59 gms. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the entire jewellery stands purchased at the declared value through a Court auction, which fact is not being disputed. The difference in weight, if any, may be on account of the benefit of some wastage like lack, gum, dust etc. in the jewellery having b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version