Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Cherokee India Private Limited Versus The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax- (OSD) -Range 8 (1) , Mumbai

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - income arising from an international transaction, having regard to its arm’s length price, as mandated by Section 92(1) of the Act - Held that:- The orders of the authorities below in the quantum assessment proceedings reveal that all information and documents as required by Section 92C of the Act read with rule 10B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 for the purpose of determination of arm’s length price were furnished by the assessee. Moreover, the addition determin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

does not suggest that the computation of price charged in the impugned international transaction done as per Section 92C of the Act is lacking in good faith or due diligence, so as to render the assessee liable for penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act r.w. Explanation-7 thereof. - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. 45/MUM/2016 - Dated:- 16-3-2016 - SHRI G.S.PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER For The Appellant by : Shri Ramesh Iyer For The Respondent by : .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mounting to ₹ 60,72,210/-. 3. Briefly put, the relevant facts are that the appellant is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Cherokee International, LLC USA. The assessee company has a manufacturing facility at SEEPZ, Andheri (E), Mumbai, wherein it undertakes manufacturing of various magnetic components like Transformers, Inductors and Printed Circuit Boards Assemblies entirely for its parent company in USA, i.e. associ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mpany. With the aforesaid business model, the assessee company filed the return of income for assessment year 2008- 09 on 29/09/2008 declaring a loss of ₹ 1,14,58,725/-, which was subject to a scrutiny assessment. In the course of the assessment proceedings, it was noticed that assessee had entered into an international transaction with the associated enterprise within the meaning of section 92B of the Act and accordingly, the matter relating to the determination of Arm s Length Price (ALP .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

₹ 1,78,64,680/- by the order of the CIT(Appeals), which has become final, as stated by the learned Representative before us. The Assessing Officer vide an order dated 30/03/2014(supra) held the assessee guilty of default under section 271(1)(c) of the Act r.w. Explanation-7 thereof, whereby he treated the assessee of having furnished inaccurate particulars of income qua the addition on account of transfer pricing adjustment of ₹ 1,78,64,860/-. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer impo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on 271(1)(c) of the Act because the transfer pricing adjustment was only as a result of a difference of opinion between assessee and the Revenue in the manner of calculation of arm s length price of the international transaction and there was no occasion where assessee s method of determining arm s length price was found to be unacceptable. At the time of hearing, Ld. Representative for the assessee emphasized that the transfer pricing study undertaken by the assessee has not been found to be er .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

from the aforesaid, the Ld. Representative for the assessee pointed out that since the assessment year 2005-06, the determination of the arm s length price of the impugned transactions have been finalized by the income tax authorities in the same manner as was done in the year under consideration, and that in the earlier assessment year of 2005-06 and 2007-08, no penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act has been levied. Therefore, according to him under identical circumstances, in this year th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ncorporation of such adjustment in the return of income itself. 6. We have carefully considered the rival submissions. Section 271(1)(c) of the Act prescribes for levy of penalty in a case where it is found that assessee has concealed the particulars of his income or that assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of such income. Coming to the specific case on hand, penalty under section 271(1)(c) has been imposed in the context of computing income arising from an international transaction, h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ause (c) of this sub-section, be deemed to represent the income in respect of which particulars have been concealed or inaccurate particulars have been furnished, unless the assessee proves to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) [or the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner] that the price charged or paid in such transaction was computed in accordance with the provisions contained in section 92C and in the manner prescribed under that section, in good faith .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee is able to prove that the price charged or paid in such an international transaction was computed in accordance with the provisions contained in section 92C of the Act and in the manner prescribed in such section in good faith and with due diligence. In other words, the circumstances prescribed in clause (c) of section 271(1) of the Act, namely, concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income are deemed to be satisfied where an addition is made in the course of de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

te that the price charged or paid in such an international transaction was computed in the manner prescribed in Section 92C in good faith and with due diligence. Quite clearly, the facts and circumstances of each case would establish as to whether or not the assessee has been able to discharge the burden of proving that price charged or paid in an international transaction has been computed in terms of section 92C in good faith and with due diligence. 6.2 In this background, we may now briefly t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

terprise in question. The assessee was being compensated on the basis of a mark-up of 6% of standard cost incurred for the operations carried out by it. The assessee had declared a loss for the year under consideration. In its T.P study, the assessee company had considered the Transaction Net Margin Method(TNMM) as most appropriate method, which has not been disputed by the Transfer Pricing Officer. The only area of difference between the assessee and the Transfer Pricing Officer was the nature .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed by the assessee on its operations rather than the standard cost of operations. This is the area of difference between the assessee and the Revenue, which has resulted in an addition of ₹ 1,78,64,680/-. 6.3 Factually speaking, in the order of Transfer Pricing Officer or the Assessing Officer there is no adverse comment with regard to the application of the TNM method selected by the assessee for determination of arm's length price of its international transaction with its associated .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t neither in assessment year 2005-06 and nor in assessment year 2007-08 penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was imposed. While in assessment year 2005-06, penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were not initiated at all, whereas in assessment year 2007-08 though the proceedings were initiated but were eventually dropped by the Assessing Officer himself. The aforesaid factual matrix is not in dispute and, in our view, the aforesaid itself renders the impugned action of the Assessing O .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r argued that so far as the instant assessment year is concerned, the assessee was aware about wrong determination of the arm's length price in relation to the international transaction with associated enterprise and, therefore, the Assessing Officer was justified in imposing penalty under section 271(1)(c)of the Act in this year. The aforesaid arguments of the Ld. Departmental Representative have been countered by the assessee by pointing out that at the time of filing return of income for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg. - Circular

Highlight: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 - Public Notice

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Circular: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20

Notification: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017

Forum: Trans1 return

News: Exchange Rate of Foreign Currency Relating To Imported and Export Goods Notified

Forum: Credit on Repair of Company Car & Its Insurance

Circular: Promote the officers of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) to the grade of Principal commissioner of customs, GST & CX

Circular: Allocate the charges amongst the Members of the Central Board of Excise and Customs

Circular: Strategy for audits in 2017-18 consequent to GST - Audit by Central Excise and service Department to continue for the accounting year 2016-17 and for the past period

Circular: Appoint the IRS (C&CE) officers as Principal Commissioner (Revision Application) and ex-officio Additional Secretary

Circular: Time limit for filing intimation for composition levy under Rule 3(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 extended to 16-8-2017

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

Circular: C.B.E. & C. Advisory on Customs related matters on introduction of Goods and Services Tax regime

Circular: List of Reduced Tax Liabilities under GST regime in comparison to present combined Indirect Tax rates

Circular: Works Contract for construction of Flats, Complex — Builders to pass on GST benefit to buyer otherwise anti-profiteering provisions of Section 171 of GST Act to apply

Circular: Clarification regarding applicability of section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, relating to zero rated supply for the purpose of Compensation Cess on exports – Regarding.

Circular: Clarification on Inter-state movement of various modes of conveyance, carrying goods or passengers or for repairs and maintenance- regarding

Forum: Duty Drawback & Input Credit - under GST

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: Addition u/s 23(1)(a) - deemed rent - once the property is let out and at any point of time this remained vacant during the same cannot be brought to tax under the head House properties income.

News: Haryana constitutes screening committee on anti-profiteering

Highlight: Valuation of imported goods - it is necessary to re-examine the matter of both license agreement as well as supply contract simultaneously, to see if the enhanced royalty was in the guise of adjustment of the price of components.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

Highlight: Cenvat credit availed on Club Membership for the Director is not admissible as it cannot be said to be remotely connected with the activity of manufacture

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version