Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Mrs. Mintu Sayermal Jain Versus Income Tax Officer 16 (3) (1) , Mumbai

Income from unexplained /undisclosed sources - Held that:- It is a classical case where various additions have been made by the AO without proper application of mind and has no distant connection with the material on record. We find that the third party transactions were added in the hands of the assessee without without any basis or material and thus, the AO framed the assessment in a hypothetical way putting the assessee to enormous harassment and inconvenience . Similarly, the ld. CIT(A) conf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or The Respondent : Shri Naveen Gupta ORDER PER RAJESH KUMAR, AM : This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 1.6.2012 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 36, Mumbai (Hereinafter called as the CIT(A) for assessment year 2007-08. 2. The issue raised in the revised grounds of appeal no.1,2 and 3 are against the confirmation of addition of ₹ 1,40,43,154/-, ₹ 10,00,000/- and ₹ 26,00,000/- as income from unexplained /undisclosed sources. 3. Facts in brief a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ly confirmed by those parties and thus made the additions of ₹ 1,40,43,154/- vide 5(a), ₹ 10,00,000/- vide para 5(b) and vide para 5(c) of the assessment order respectively. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the First Appellate Authority. The ld. CIT(A) called for the remand report from the AO and in the said remand report the AO stated that the assessee was afforded an opportunity to appear before him, however none appeared before the AO. Ther .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee vide her reply dated 24.1.2012. The ld. CIT(A) finally observed and held that the assessee was not able to rebut the stand of the AO on the remand report and simply stated that all these transactions were through banking channels and were fully accommodated for. The ld. CIT(A) also observed that all the submissions made by the assessee were without any documentary evidence and therefore were not tenable and reliable in law. Hence, the ld. CIT(A), dismissed the appeal of the assesse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s from M/s Sera Organics Pvt Ltd on 24.1.2007 by cheque which was duly confirmed by the parties by a confirmation letter dated 1.4.2007, which is supported by a letter placed at page 13 of the paper book. The ld. AR further submitted that the AO wrongly observed as stated in para 5(a) of the Assessment order that the assessee has advanced ₹ 1,75,43,154/- to Sera Organic Pvt Ltd on various dates which were not accounted for which is totally wrong and against the facts of the case of the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

As per the certificate ₹ 109.50 lakhs was received by M/s Sera Organics Private Limited from M/s Chintamani Iron bank statement of M/S Sera Organics Pvt Ltd , ₹ 7.50 lacs from Jammudeep Metal and Tubes Pvt Ltd and ₹ 7.00 from Life Lines Metals and Tubes Pvt Ltd The assessee also filed a copy of ledger account of Sera Organics Pvt Ltd in the books of assessee, bank statement of M/s Millennium Metal issued by the Centurian Bank placed at page 14 to 22 of assessee s paper book, in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ved from M/s Chintamani Iron and Steel Co.Pvt.Ltd and ₹ 4 lakhs advanced which was not reflected in the bank statement and therefore, he disallowed ₹ 10 lakhs which is also totally wrong and against the facts. Before the AO and the ld. CIT(A), the ld.AR submitted a confirmation letter dated 1.4.2007 confirming ₹ 18 lakhs payable to M/s Chintamani Iron and Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The ld. Counsel submitted that during the year, the assessee received an amount of ₹ 8 lakhs on 8. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f ₹ 14 lakhs , two times ₹ 8 lakhs. Out of the three cheques ₹ 14 lakhs was from M/s Chintamani Iron and Steel Co.Pvt.Ltd and rest of the two cheques were from other parties namely M/s Delite Tubs and Alloys Pvt Ltd and Jammudeep Metal and Tubes Pvt Ltd. which has been mentioned backside of the page 48 of the paper book. Similarly, at page 47, the assessee received ₹ 8 lakhs from M/s Chintamani Iron and Steel Co.Pvt.Ltd on 18.9.2006 against cheque of ₹ 8 lakhs was r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

were wrong and without basis. In respect of third addition of ₹ 26 lakhs ,the ld. Counsel of the assessee submitted that during the year the assessee received various cheques from the said party and also repaid at the end of the year as per copy of account filed at page 37 of the paper book and net balance outstanding to M/s Jammudeep Metal and Tubes P Ltd was ₹ 26 lakhs which was confirmed by the party in the confirmation letter placed at page 36 of the paper book. The AO also obser .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gs and repaying the advances by account payee cheques to these parties on various dates as is clear from page 37 of the paper book which was duly confirmed by the confirmation letter which is placed at page 36 of the paper book. The copy of the bank statement of to M/s Jammudeep Metal and Tubes P Ltd was also placed at pages 38 to 40 of the paper book, in which the transactions between the assessee and the said parties were duly reflected as being received and repaid on various date and thus the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version