Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Ajay Kumar Singh Versus Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Patna, Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range -4, Patna

2016 (4) TMI 741 - PATNA HIGH COURT

Allowance of depreciation after applying net profit rate - Held that:- Neither before the Assessing Officer or before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) or before the Tribunal, the appellant referred to the balance-sheet to contend that he should have been allowed depreciation after applying net profit rate. Once the Assessing Officer has found that net profit rate has been applied @12% after depreciation, one can infer that the Assessing Officer was conscious of the depreciation claimed b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

JJ. For the Appellant : Mr. K M Mishra, Adv For the Respondent : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sc. SC and Mrs. Archana Prasad, Jr. SC JUDGMENT ( Per: Honourable Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta ) The assessee is in appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act ) against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ) on 12th December, 2007 arising out of ITA No. 255/Pat/2007, relating to the assessment year 2003-04, wh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fied in confirming the addition of ₹ 6,41,483/ on account of cash credit which was claimed to have been introduced as capital by proprietor in the business and whether the same does not amount to double taxation as being part of the gross profit estimated by the Tribunal? 3. The assessee is a Contractor. The return of income for the assessment year 2003-04 was filed on 22.10.2003 showing total income of ₹ 12,86,800/-. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Act on 11.12. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ated as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Act. 4. The appeal on these two points against the said order before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) remained unsuccessful. However, in further appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, the learned Tribunal applied net profit rate of 8% as against 12% applied by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal). 5. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant relies upon a Circular dated 31st August, 1965 to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version