Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Income Tax Officer, Budaun (U.P.) Versus M/s Pranay Towers

Addition on account of disallowance of claim of purchases u/s 40A(3) - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- Terms of Section 40A(3) of the Act are not absolute and that the genuine and bonafide transactions are not taken out of the sweep of the Section 40A(3) of the Act and it is open to the assessee to furnish to the satisfaction of the AO, the circumstances under which the payment in the manner prescribed u/s 40A(3) of the Act was not practicable or would have caused to the genuine diffic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

instant case, the cash payments were made by the assessee to the agent Sh. S.K. Tiwari who in turn made the purchases in cash for the assessee and charged the commission for the said transaction which has been accepted as genuine and allowed to be set off against the income in the profits and loss accounts, by the AO. Therefore, the transaction relating to the purchases of potatoes was clearly covered by the exception laid down in Rule 6DD(k) of the I.T. Rules, 1962 and was outside the purview o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se of agricultural produce is kept outside the purview of Section 40A(3) of the act. Therefore, we do not see any infirmity in the order of the ld. CIT(A) on this issue. - Decided against revenue - ITA No. 4087/Del/2013 - Dated:- 26-2-2016 - Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena Pillai, JM For The Assessee : Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv. For The Revenue : Sh. Ved Prakash Mishra, Sr. DR ORDER Per N. K. Saini, AM: This is an appeal by the department against the order dated 17.04.2013 of ld. CIT(A), Bareilly .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tners of the M/s Pranay Towers, the assessee. This cash memo evidences that the payment was received from M/s Pranay Towers to M/s R A Traders, and if agent was there as claimed by the assessee, he might be facilitating the assessee for paperwork and evidently not part of transaction. 2. Ld. CIT(A) has erred in ignoring the fact that there was no requirement for the assessee or its agent to make payment in cash. The order of Ld. CIT(Appeals) tells that M/s R A Traders had put a condition that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sunderstood the provision and the order of the Ld. CIT (A) is in the nature of creating a bypass in special circumstances, which has never been intention of the law. Ld. C1T(A) has not tried to find those special circumstances. 5. The Ld. CIT has grossly misunderstood the law that exception cannot be made available on the payment in cash for the purchase of potatoes from a person, who is not proved to be the producer of potatoes and is only a trader, broker or any other middlemen by whatever nam .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

done between the agent of the assessee and third party, notwithstanding with the facts in this case that agent was not at all involved in the process of transaction as the invoice has been signed between purchaser and seller. 7. Any other ground that may be urged at the time of hearing. 3. From the above grounds it is gathered that only grievance of the department in this appeal relates to the deletion of addition of ₹ 1,20,00,000/- made by the AO on account of disallowance of claim of pu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AO requisitioned the information u/s 133(6) of the Act from M/s R.A. Traders, C-87, Avantika, Moradabad which revealed that the assessee was involved in purchase of 12,200 bags of potatoes @ 960/- per bag in cash for ₹ 1,17,12,000/-. The AO also requisitioned the copy of ledger and cash book on the dates of transactions from M/s R.A. Traders and thereafter asked the assessee to furnish the reason as to why the payments could not be considered as payments in contravention contained u/s 40A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted by the assessee and have gone through each fact of both the parties, who are involved in transaction. As per section 40(A)(3), no deduction is to be allowed, if aggregate payment to a person in a day exceeding ₹ 20,000 otherwise than by an a/c payee bank cheque or a/c payee bank draft, barring cases covered in rule 6DD which provides for exemption in certain cases or circumstances. Here in this case, the assessee, M/s Pranay Towers has made purchases for a sum of ₹ 1,17,20,000/- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act,1961 as per Attar Singh Grumukh Singh etc. Vs ITO (SC)191 lTR667(pp.673). • Both the transacting parties have bank accounts and there was no reason to pay in cash as there did not exist any circumstances warranting cash payment. • Delivery of goods was made much after transaction, so no exigency, could be established to make cash payment. • In his application u/s 144A, the assessee has claimed that as the payment was through agent, the assessee was authorized to make the payme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ITO, Budaun In view of the above observations, I am of the view that the assessee has contravened the provisions contained in section 40A(3) of I.T.Act1961 read with 6DD of Income Tax Rules. Rule 6DD basically allows cash payments for considerations of business expediency and other relevant factors. Here in this case the assessee has purchased potatoes in cash and has incurred heavy losses. Had the assessee firm earned heavy profits on such cash purchases, it might be said to have been covered .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

inding, ITO, Budaun is hereby directed to complete his assessment disallowing such claim of purchases. ITO, Budaun is further directed to send the copy of assessment order within 7 days of passing the assessment order. Case records are also being returned herewith. Encl: as above Sd/- (AMIT NIGAM) Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-II Moradabad 6. After receiving the copy of directions u/s 144A of the Act, the AO observed that there was no requirement for the assessee or its agent to make p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment was covered within Rule 6DD of the I.T. Rules if the assessee had made it. The AO also observed that the Rule 6DD(k) of the I.T. Rules was to facilitate the assessee that if the transaction between the assessee and the other party was within Rule 6DD(k) of I.T. Rules, same would hold true and in norms between the agent of the assessee and the other party too but, if any, transaction between the assessee and the third party was in contravention of the provisions of Section 40A(3) of the Act, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

April 2009 and the payments were made through the said agent who was assigned this work of dealing with the said firm for procuring the potatoes but the seller firm M/s R.A. Traders was not comfortable with the market credibility of the assessee and had demanded advance payment in cash. It was further stated that the assessee could not find storage space in cold storage for storing the purchased stock and as potatoes began to rot, those were sold at loss in the open market. However, the questio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed by the AO, held that the payment by crossed cheque was insisted to enable the Assessing Authority to ascertain whether the payment was genuine or whether it was out of income from undisclosed sources and that the considerations of business expediency and other relevant factors were not excluded and that the genuine & bonafide transaction were not taken out of the sweep of this section 40A(3) of the Act. Therefore, the judgment of the Hon ble Apex Court was not rightly appreciated by the A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s R.A. Traders had been proved beyond doubt before the AO and it was the business needs of the assessee who had clearly stated the fact before the AO that the purchases were made through agents and the cash payment was made as it was a condition laid down by the seller. It was accordingly submitted that the assessee s case was squarely covered under the exceptions laid down in Rule 6DD(k) of the Income Tax Rules. As regards to the purchases of ₹ 2,88,000/-, it was submitted that the same w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

,20,00,000/-, out of which purchases of ₹ 1,17,12,000/- had been made from M/s R.A. Traders and the balance amounting to ₹ 2,88,000 had been made from other small parties. He further observed that in the case of provisions of Section 40A(3) of the Act, there is Rule 6DD which lays down certain exceptional circumstances under which purchases in cash exceeding a specified limit are allowed to be made. The ld. CIT(A) pointed out that in the assessee s case, M/s R.A. Traders, the seller .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

acted as an agent and had earned brokerage in this deal, which had been debited by the assessee in the audited profit and loss account which had also been accepted by the AO. As regards to the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Attar Singh Gurmukh Singh (supra) relied by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Moradabad, the ld. CIT(A) pointed out that in the said case it has been held that genuine transactions are kept outside the purview of Section 40A(3) of the Act and while u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s was also not the claim of the AO that the purchases and payment had not been made by the assessee firm through the agents. He further observed that a mere confirmation on the bill of M/s R.A. Traders by the partner of the assessee firm did not help the case of the AO. According to the ld. CIT(A), it was the decision of the assessee and his prerogative as to how he had to conduct the business and that as to whether the purchases should have been made directly by the assessee or through the agen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

IT(A) further observed that Sh. S.K. Tiwari had confirmed the fact that he had acted as an agent of the entire transaction of purchases and payments were done through him. The ld. CIT(A) opined that this was a case of a genuine transaction where the purchases were made through Sh. S.K. Tiwari in cash as was required by the seller, therefore, it was squarely covered by the exception laid down in Rule 6DD(k) of the I.T. Rules and thus the assessee was not hit by the provisions of Section 40A(3) of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was also deleted. 9. Now the department is in appeal. The ld. DR strongly supported the order of the AO and reiterated the observations made in the assessment order dated 26.03.2013. He further submitted that the assessee made the purchases in cash from M/s R.A. Traders and the partner of the assessee firm signed the cash vouchers which clearly established that the purchases were made in cash exceeding ₹ 20,000/-, so it was hit by the provisions of Section 40A(3) of the Act and the AO rig .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d have been made u/s 40A(3) of the Act as the transaction was covered under the exception laid down in Rule 6DD(k) of the I.T. Rules, 1962. 11. We have considered the submissions of both the parties and carefully gone through the material available on the record. In the present case, it is an admitted fact that the assessee made the purchases of potatoes valuing ₹ 1,17,12,000/- from M/s R.A. Traders, Moradabad through the agent Sh. S.K. Tiwari. The AO made the inquiries u/s 133(6) of the A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on is not hit by the provisions contained in Section 40A(3) of the Act. The sub-clause (k) of the said Rule 6DD provides as under: Where the payment is made by any person to his agent who is required to make the payment in cash for goods or services on behalf of such person. 12. In the present case, it is an admitted fact that Sh. S.K. Tiwari acted as an agent and procured the potatoes from M/s R.A. Traders, Moradabad who doubted the credibility of the assessee and insisted on cash payment. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the I.T. Rules, 1962. In that view of the matter, we are of the view that the ld. CIT(A) was fully justified in deleting the addition made by the AO. As regards to the judgment of the Hon ble Apex Court relied by the AO in the case of Attar Singh Gurmukh Singh Vs ITO, Ludhiana 191 ITR 667 (supra) relied by the AO is concerned in the said case, it has been held as under: Section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which provides that expenditure in excess of ₹ 2500 (Rs.10,000 after the 1987 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sallow the deduction claimed as expenditure in respect of which payment is not made by crossed bank draft. The payment by crossed cheque or crossed bank draft is insisted upon to enable the assessing authority to ascertain whether the payment was genuine or whether it was out of income from undisclosed sources. The terms of section 40A(3) are not absolute. Consideration of business expediency and other relevant factors are not excluded. Genuine and bona fide transactions are not taken out of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

specified under the rule. It will be clear from the provisions of section 40A(3) and rule 6DD that they are intended to regulate business transactions and to prevent the use of unaccounted money or reduce the changes to use black money for business transactions. 13. From the ratio laid down in the aforesaid case, it is crystal clear that the terms of Section 40A(3) of the Act are not absolute and that the genuine and bonafide transactions are not taken out of the sweep of the Section 40A(3) of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version