Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (6) TMI 138

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as "A" Bench dated 13.10.2006 in ITA No.2343/Mds/2004, raising the substantial question of law as to whether the Tribunal was right in allowing depreciation on "Chlorine Containers" claimed by the assessee at 100% wherein the rule specifically states that 100% depreciation is available only on "Gas cylinders including valves and regulators", under the following facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The relevant assessment year is 1996-97. The assessee company is engaged in the manufacture and sale of chemicals. Even though the assessment for the year 1996-97 was completed on 18.3.1999, the same was re-opened by issuing notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act. During the re-assessment, the Assessing Officer disallowed the dep .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... including valves and regulators, for which 100% depreciation is allowable. Rejecting the contention of the assessee, the Assessing Officer allowed depreciation only at 25% treating the asset in question as a normal machinery and plant and not as a gas cylinder including valves and regulators, by his assessment order dated 21.3.2002. 4. Against which, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), who by order dated 23.7.2004 confirmed the order of the assessing officer, which necessitated the assessee to prefer a further appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, which, following a decision of the Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Goyal MG Gases Ltd., reported in (2006) 201 CT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ators for their entitlement to 100% depreciation, it may not be proper for this Court to import such qualifications to deny the benefits conferred under Item III (3)(v) of Appendix-I of the Rules, as it is a settled law that the statute should be read as it is without distorting or twisting its language. 7. In a case where the statutory provision is plain and unambiguous, the Court shall not interpret the same in a different manner, only because of harsh consequences arising therefrom; and it is well known that the Court can iron out the creases but it cannot change the texture of the fabric, cannot enlarge the scope of legislation or intention when the language of the provision is plain and unambiguous, cannot add or substract words to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ibutes of a cylinder, which was rejected by the Revenue on the ground that since the so-called cylinders were merely containers and were mounted on trucks, the assessee therein was entitled to depreciation at the rate of 25 percent as eligible to "plants and machineries". While deciding the issue whether the item claimed by the assessee therein is gas cylinders or machinery, the Division Bench has found that there is no dispute that the item in question was gas cylinder, though no doubt a big one and that the expression 'gas cylinders' used in Appendix I to the IT Rules does not mention the size of the gas cylinders nor does it say that gas cylinders should be only for cooking purpose or for any other particular purpose and any interpreta .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates