Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Suresh Kumar Somani Versus Income Tax Officer, Kishangarh.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - Held that:- It is undisputed fact that these cash creditors are opening as on 01/4/2006 and not pertained to year under consideration. The ld Assessing Officer issued notice in quantum proceeding U/s 133(6) of the Act. The parties concerned filed confirmations in some of the cases. It is also fact that the assessee paid the outstanding during the year and in subsequent year but could not prove beyond doubt before the Assessing Officer. It is well settled .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ajmer for A.Y. 2007-08. The effective grounds of appeal are as under:- 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ld CIT(A) has grossly erred in confirming the penalty of ₹ 13,77,028/- levied U/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 1.1 That the ld CIT(A) has erred in upholding the penalty levied U/s 271(1)(c) of the Income /Tax Act, 1961 without appreciating the fact that the income was surrendered by the assessee during the course of assessment proceedings and the income .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ined no income on which tax sought to be evaded could be calculated which fact was not appreciated by the ld CIT(A). 2. The assessee is engaged in the business of purchase of sale of marble and granite, tiles and slabs. The return of income was filed on 30/07/2007 declaring total income of ₹ 2,50,070/-. During the course of scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer made addition of ₹ 20,21,897/- U/s 41(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act) and also initiated penalty p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

loan of ₹ 1,48,500/- and ₹ 19,12,007/- U/s 68 of the Act. The assessee was unable to produce the cash creditors before the Assessing Officer and voluntarily surrendered these amounts to avoid the litigation. The outstanding of ₹ 20,21,897/- shown in the books of account, for which cash payment had been made and necessary evidences were not available with the assessee, which is also surrendered voluntarily before the Assessing Officer to avoid litigation. The assessee on 18/12/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ors (2008) 214 CTR (Mad) 524 for surrender under the survey. (iii) CIT Vs S.I. Paripushpam (2001) 249 ITR 550 (Mad) for agreed addition. (iv) CIT Vs D&H Secheron Electronics Ltd. (2006) 203 CTR (MP) 164 for surrender made. (v) Gebilal Kanhialal (HUF) Vs ACIT (2004) 270 ITR 523 (Raj.) for surrender made. (vi) CIT Vs. Badrilal Chaturbhuj (2004) 265 ITR 329 (Raj) for buy peace. (vii) CIT Vs Rajnish Nath Aggarwal (2008) 219 CTR (P&H) 590 for surrender made. (viii) Hindustan Steel Ltd. Vs St .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eply received from the various parties. It is then the assessee came forward with the surrender letter and not suo moto. If the assessee s intention was bonafide, why he made surrender in last. The case laws relied upon by the assessee are also not squarely applicable, which was applicable on surrender voluntarily with bonafide belief. In assessee s case, the investigation of department as compelled the assessee to surrender amount for taxation as no other option was left. In assessee s case, th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Komal Basha Vs DCIT (2009) 316 ITR 0058 (Mad). After considering the above case laws, the Assessing Officer imposed penalty U/s 271(1)(c) of the Act for concealing the particulars of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income at ₹ 13,70,028/-, which is 100% of tax sought to be evaded. 3. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter before the ld CIT(A), who had dismissed the appeal by observing that where there is difference between th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd material to the computation of his total income have been disclosed by him. The penalty proceedings are independent proceedings. The penalty order should contend the reasons for its conclusion but this does not mean that the Assessing Officer is required to bring on record the additional or new evidences, which was not part of the regular assessment. Where the assessment order itself contends the fact which justified an inference of the concealment, penalty order is sustainable. This view der .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ellant about the result of such enquiries that the appellant agreed to surrender this amount. In such a situation Assessing Officer has rightly concluded that appellant furnished inaccurate particulars of his income, in the return filed by him. It cannot be held that the surrender of income by appellant was voluntary, because the surrender was made only after detection of the same by AO. In this case it is not established that the conduct and explanation of appellant was bonafide, therefore the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Kev) - CIT V/s Guruvijay Kuri Co. Ltd. (d) [2009] 316ITR 0058 (Mad) - Komal Basha V/s DCIT. The ld CIT(A), therefore hold that AO is justified in imposing penalty of ₹ 13,77,028/- in this case and the same is confirmed. Ground No. 2 is thus dismissed. 4. Now the assessee is in appeal before us. The ld AR of the assessee has submitted that in balance sheet, the assessee had shown unsecured loan in the name of 8 persons received from them in amount below ₹ 20,000/-, which were opening .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cash creditors in the books of account and balance sheet. The said unsecured loan did not pertain to year under appeal. There were opening balances of unsecured loan taken by the assessee in preceding assessment year and not in the year under appeal. The opening balance cannot be added U/s 68 of the Act during the year under consideration but the assessee had not raised this issue in appeal before the ld CIT(A) due to prolonged litigation and wanted to peace of mind, the assessee voluntarily has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

5 and penalty should not be levied in routine manner. At the time of imposing penalty, the ld Assessing Officer reproduced the finding given in the quantum addition. There is no fresh application of mind independently. He further relied on the decision in the case of Narangs International Hotels (P) Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle-1(2) 137 ITD 53 wherein it has been held that mere confirmations of addition cannot ipso facto lead to inference that there has been concealment of income or furnishing inaccura .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the penalty imposed on account of voluntarily surrender at ₹ 20,21,895/- that these credit entries were outstanding as on 01/4/2006, which was not received during the year under consideration. During the year under consideration, the assessee had paid back to M/s JK Marbles Industry ₹ 6,08,000/-, M/s Rajhans Marble House ₹ 3,43,000/- and M/s Venketesh Marble ₹ 1,00,350/- and remaining amount outstanding as on 31/3/2007. These creditors were related to purchase made .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s in the year under consideration and in subsequent year. During the course of assessment proceedings, notices U/s 133(6) were issued to M/s JK Marbles Industry and M/s Lovely Marbles. The Assessing Officer received the confirmations from them duly confirming the copy of account of the assessee. The ld Assessing Officer has drawn adverse inference on the basis of that payments were made in subsequent year through bearer cheque. M/s Laxmi Flooring had squared up the account of the assessee but as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e following decisions: (i) Smt. Durga Devi Somani in ITA No. 672/JP/2011. (ii) Sh. Ashish Gupta in ITA No. 671/JP/2011. (iii) Smt. Sumsitra Devi Agarwal ITA No. 687/JP/2011. (iv) Shri JUgal Kishore Sharma ITA No. 686/JP/2011. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mak Data Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT (2014) 1 SCC 674 does not apply and is distinguishable on the facts and circumstances of the present case. In that case, the assessee did not offer any explanation except the said plea of voluntarily su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cal facts. He has drawn our attention on page NO. 29 of the finding of the Coordinate Bench in the case of Durga Devi Somani Vs. ITO, Ashish Gupta Vs. ITO, Ashok Kumar Kamdar Vs. ITO, Sumitra Devi Agarwal Vs. ITO and Jugal Kishore Sharma Vs. ITO and prayed to delete the addition. 5. At the outset, the ld DR has vehemently supported the order of the ld CIT(A). 6. We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the material available on the record. It is undisputed fact that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eration U/s 68 of the Act. The Coordinate Bench in the case of Durga Devi Somani Vs. ITO, ITA No. 672/JP/2011 for A.Y. 2007-08 order dated 31/10/2014, in the case of Ashish Gupta Vs. ITO ITA No. 671/JP/2011 A.Y. 2007-08 order dated 17/10/2014, in the case of Ashok Kumar Kamdar Vs. ITO in ITA No. 684/JP/2011 A.Y. 2007-08 order dated 18/11/2011, in the case of Sumitra Devi Agarwal Vs. ITO ITA No. 687/JP/2011 A.Y. 2007-08 order dated 01/10/2015 and in the case of Jugal Kishore Sharma Vs. ITO in ITA .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Article: SERVICES UNDER REVERSE CHARGE UNDER GST REGIME

Forum: Duty Drawback & Input Credit - under GST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Credit on Repair of Company Car & Its Insurance

Highlight: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg. - Circular

Highlight: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 - Public Notice

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Circular: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20

Notification: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017

Forum: Trans1 return

News: Exchange Rate of Foreign Currency Relating To Imported and Export Goods Notified

Circular: Promote the officers of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) to the grade of Principal commissioner of customs, GST & CX

Circular: Allocate the charges amongst the Members of the Central Board of Excise and Customs

Circular: Strategy for audits in 2017-18 consequent to GST - Audit by Central Excise and service Department to continue for the accounting year 2016-17 and for the past period

Circular: Appoint the IRS (C&CE) officers as Principal Commissioner (Revision Application) and ex-officio Additional Secretary

Circular: Time limit for filing intimation for composition levy under Rule 3(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 extended to 16-8-2017

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

Circular: C.B.E. & C. Advisory on Customs related matters on introduction of Goods and Services Tax regime

Circular: List of Reduced Tax Liabilities under GST regime in comparison to present combined Indirect Tax rates

Circular: Works Contract for construction of Flats, Complex — Builders to pass on GST benefit to buyer otherwise anti-profiteering provisions of Section 171 of GST Act to apply

Circular: Clarification regarding applicability of section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, relating to zero rated supply for the purpose of Compensation Cess on exports – Regarding.

Circular: Clarification on Inter-state movement of various modes of conveyance, carrying goods or passengers or for repairs and maintenance- regarding

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: Addition u/s 23(1)(a) - deemed rent - once the property is let out and at any point of time this remained vacant during the same cannot be brought to tax under the head House properties income.

News: Haryana constitutes screening committee on anti-profiteering

Highlight: Valuation of imported goods - it is necessary to re-examine the matter of both license agreement as well as supply contract simultaneously, to see if the enhanced royalty was in the guise of adjustment of the price of components.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

Highlight: Cenvat credit availed on Club Membership for the Director is not admissible as it cannot be said to be remotely connected with the activity of manufacture

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version