Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Radha Mohan Maheshwari Versus D.C.I.T. Central Circle-3, Jaipur.

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Assessing Officer has not recorded satisfaction specifically for concealed particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income and on both. The various courts have held that this satisfaction can be for both the purposes i.e. for concealed particulars of income and furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income jointly as both the satisfaction are overlapping, which is also not found place in the case before us. The Assessing Officer ev .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d in law, therefore, we delete the penalty confirmed by the ld CIT(A). See CIT Vs M/s Manjunath Cotton & Ginning Factory & Ors [2013 (7) TMI 620 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. 773/JP/2013 - Dated:- 18-3-2016 - SHRI T.R.MEENA, AM & SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM For The Assessee : Shri P.C. Parwal (CA) For The Revenue : Mrs. Neena Jeph (JCIT) ORDER PER T.R. MEENA, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 16/09/2013 of the learned CIT(A), C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

notice issued u/s 271(1)(c) does not state whether the charge against the assessee is for concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and the penalty order also does not specify as to on what offence penalty is levied i.e. for concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. 1.2 The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred on facts and in law in confirming the levy of penalty of ₹ 14,25,187/- u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nse to notice U/s 153A, the assessee has filed return of income declaring same income i.e. ₹ 1,56,290/-. During the course of search, the assessee disclosed additional income U/s 132(4) of the Act of ₹ 5.00 crores for different years i.e. for A.Y. 2006-07 ₹ 1.00 crore, for A.Y. 2007-08 ₹ 3.00 crores, and for A.Y. 2008-09 at ₹ 1.00 crore in total ₹ 5.00 crores. The ld Assessing Officer scrutinized the seized material and came to conclusion as under:- The ld Ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

th sections 274 and 275 of I.T. Act for concealment of income/furnishing of inaccurate particular of income. Therefore, penalty proceedings are initiated separately. (b) I am also satisfied that it is a fit case for imposing of penalty proceeding U/s 271AAA for A.Y. 2007-08 and 2008-09 read with sections 274 and 275 of I.T. Act on assessed undisclosed income as the search has been initiated U/s 132 of I.T. Act after 01/6/2007. Therefore, penalty proceedings are initiated separately. In concludin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

9 as under:- U/s 271(1)(c):- Concealed particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income . 2.1 Before imposing penalty, the ld Assessing Officer gave reasonable opportunity of being heard on 30/10/2009. Again opportunity was allowed vide show cause noticed dated 09/2/2012. The assessee replied vide letter dated 09/3/2012. Brief facts of the case has been reproduced by the Assessing Officer on page 1,2,3,4,5 of the penalty order. The ld Assessing Officer after considering the pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

me reduced to ₹ 85,17,000/- against surrender of ₹ 1 Crore. Therefore, the claim of the assessee that out of total income of ₹ 5 Crores income of ₹ 4.49 Crores was appropriated towards unaccounted income of assessment year 2006-07 to 2008-09 and surplus income of ₹ 51 lakhs was more than the addition made for the assessment year 2002-03 to 2005-06. (d) The assessee not disclosed any income in the statement u/s 132(4) of the IT Act, 1961 for the 'assessment year .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssment proceedings. The assessee has coated para-5(c) of the assessment order in his written submission. The claim of the assessee is not acceptable. Though no mention is available in para-5(c) of the assessment order but in the concluding para (Page-17) of the assessment order regarding initiation of penalty proceedings following finding has been recorded- Penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 r.w.s. 274/275 is issued separately for concealment/furnishing of inaccurate particulars of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the orders of the ITAT allowing relief to the assessee in the orders for these three assessment years. (g) The assessee has relied on judgment of the Rajasthan High Court in case of CIT vs. Kanhaiyalal 299 ITR 19 and Madras High Court in case of CIT vs. S.D.V. Chandru 266 ITR 175. These judgments relates to offer of income in the statement u/s 132(4) of the IT Act, 1961 and immunity available under explanation 5 to section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961. The ratio of these judgments is not applic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs Ltd. (2008) 300 ITR 308 (P&H) Section - 271 (1)(c) CIT Vs. Ajaib Singh & Co. (2001) 253 ITR 630 (Puj. & Har.) The ratio of above judgments is not applicable to the case of the assessee. The case of Hindustan Steel Ltd. 83 ITR 26 and Dharmendra Textile Processors 306 ITR 277 (SC) has been over ruled by the Supreme Court in the case of Dilip N Shroff Vs CIT 291 ITR 519 (SC) and in favour of the revenue. (i) The ratio of other judgments are related to claim of expenditure etc and dis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cretion with the authority imposing penalty. Hence, revenue is not required to prove the element of mens rea on the part of assessee. This decision was understood to mean that levy of penalty is automatic. The above decision has been explained by the SC in subsequent decision in the case of UOI-v- Rajasthan Sps & Wvg Mills 224 CTR 1 SC wherein it is explained that levy of penalty is not automatic. If the conditions specified in the section are satisfied then alone, penalty is leviable. Facts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ce Petro products 322 ITR 158 SC by observing that the said decision is an authority only for the proposition that element of mens rea stands excluded from the scope of the provisions of section 271(l)(c) and it is only to this extent the decision in case of Dilip N shroff stands overruled. It is further held that conditions of that section must exist before levy of penalty. It is for revenue to establish that such conditions exist. It is only the element of mens rea which is not required to be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

30529/- 3. Tax sought to be evaded (1-2) ₹ 1425187/- 4. 100% of Tax sought to be evaded ₹ 1425187/- 5. 300% of Tax sought to be evaded ₹ 4275561/- 6. Penalty imposed equivalent to 100% of Tax sought to be evaded ₹ 1425187/- Issue necessary forms. This order has been passed after prior approval of the Jt. Commissioner of income-Tax, Central Range, Jaipur received vide her office letter No. Joint CIT(C)/ Penalty/JPR/2011-12/2380 dated 15.03.2012. The ld Assessing Officer im .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ions of the AR on the following grounds: i) On examination of the facts it is seen that search in the case of appellant was conducted from 21 to 25th June, 2007. The return of income U/s 139 for this A.Y. was filed on 8.9.2005 declaring total income of ₹ 1,56,290/-. Subsequently return u/s 153A was filed declaring total income of ₹ 1,56,290/-. The assessment order was passed on 30.10.2009 determining the income of the appellant at ₹ 44,23,148/-. The CIT(A) and Hon. ITAT Jaipur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or other valuable article or thing (hereafter in this Explanation referred to as assets) and the assessee claims that such assets have been acquired by him by utilizing (wholly or in part) his income for any previous year; or ii) Any income based on any entry in any books of accounts or other documents or transactions and he claims that such entry in the books of accounts or other documents or transactions represents his income (wholly or in part) for any previous year. Which has ended before th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n (1) of this section, be deemed to have concealed the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income. iii) This Explanation is a non-obstante clause and it is a deeming provision for purpose of imposition of penalty once the specific conditions are fulfilled. The facts of the case of the appellant are examined with reference to the conditions laid down as per Explanantion-5A of sec. 271 (l)(c) as follows: a) The search was carried out from 21 to 25th June, 2007 i.e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

business outside his regular books of accounts income from which was not declared in his return. This was admitted to by him. A finding of fact regarding the matter was given by Hon. ITAT in quantum appeal of appellant vide order ITA No. 1302, 1303, 1304/JP/2010 for A.Y. 2002- 03, 2005-06 and 2008-09 dated 14.7.2011, on page 9 para 2.10 as follows: The assessee is doing business as, per regular books of accounts and is also doing business outside the books of accounts for which no regular cash b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the Hon. ITAT in its order. Thus the facts of the case are clearly covered under the provisions of Explanation-5 A to sec. 271 (1)(c) and the appellant is deemed to have concealed the particular of his income, since documents were found during the course of search showing undeclared income by way of investment in unaccounted debtors. iv) The AR of the appellant has raised the objection that the AO had specifically mentioned the assessment years namely A.Y. 2002-03 to 2004-05 and 2007-08 and 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

her of the orders relied on by him where exactly the satisfaction for initiating proceedings u/s 271(l)(c) is required to be noted. The AO has mentioned on page 15, para C of his order that he was satisfied that the case of the assessee is fit for imposing penalty us/ 271 (1 )(c) for A.Y. 2002- 03 to 2004-05 and while concluding the assessment order for A.Y. 2005-06 he has categorically noted as follows: Penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s 274/275 is issued separately for concealment/ furnishing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

this is more a matter of convenience than of legal requirement. All that the law required, so far as the penalty proceedings are concerned, is that they should be imitated in the course of the proceedings for assessment. It is sufficient, if there is some record somewhere, even apart from the assessment order itself, that the AO has recorded his satisfaction that the assessee is guilty of concealment or other default for which penalty action is called for. The fact that the AO has noted his sat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

isfaction required. In cases where sales were found to have been made outside books and not disclosed in the original return documents relating to undisclosed sales having been found during search, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was upheld. a. DCIT vs. K. Natarajan (ITAT, Bang) 2 ITR (Trib) 273 b. ACIT vs. Kirit Dahyabhai Patel (ITAT, Ahd.-TM) 121 ITD 159 These findings are applicable to the facts of the case of the appellant because not only has he not declared the income in the return filed u/s 153A th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lty notice be issued for concealment/ furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. However while passing the penalty order the AO has given a categorical finding that the penalty was being imposed on concealed income. The Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT vs. M/s Manjunatha Cotton & Jinning Factory & Ors. has admitted that there could be some cases which would attract both the offences. The specific observations are reproduced below: Clause (c) deals with two specific offences, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

It is not open to the authority, at the time of imposing penalty to impose penalty on the grounds other than what assessee was called upon to meet. Thus it is seen that the Hon. Karnataka High Court itself has accepted that there may be cases where there may be overlapping of the two offences and in such cases the initiation of penalty proceedings must be for both the offences. Thus in the case of the appellant the AO while initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) was satisfied that penalty .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

271(1 )(c) for only concealment of his income. Thus the principle of natural justice was not offended given the facts of the case of the appellant. vi) The next contention of the AR of the appellant is that on the basis of the approval memos found during the course of search the assessee surrendered an amount of ₹ 5 Cr. in his statement u/s 132(4) in A.Y. 2006-07 to 2008-09. He accepted the taxability of debtors in earlier years on the basis of the date mentioned on the approval memos duri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he case of CIT vs. Kanhaiya Lai (supra) was applicable as per Explanation-5 of sec. 271(l)(c). The Hon. High Court has observed that from the language of sub clause (2) of Explanation-5 of sec. 271(l)(c), it is clear that it does not contemplate the requirement of the assessee paying tax in respect of such income, in any particular A.Y. only. It was clarified that the immunity as per such clause (2) of Explanation- 5 would not be lost, simply because of the spreading of the income over more year .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

R of the appellant has filed submissions that the AO had passed an order u/s 154 dated 28.1.2011 determining the tax on the total assessed income of ₹ 44,11,435/- at ₹ 14,39,632/- as against ₹ 14,55,716/- mentioned in penalty order. Relief was sought to this extent while determining quantum of penalty. The AO is directed to verify the submissions of the AR and determine the correct tax on the concealed income and thereafter calculate the penalty @ 100% of the tax sought to be e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessment years for which he intended to initiate the penalty proceedings. This satisfaction he has recorded for AY 2002-03, 03-04, 04- 05, 07-08 & 08-09 only. For AY 2005-06 & 2006-07, no satisfaction is recorded for initiation of penalty proceedings. Therefore only because at the end of the assessment order, the AO has stated to have issued penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act, the same cannot be taken as the satisfaction of the AO of having initiated the penalty proceedings. It may .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

een held that the satisfaction should be arrived at during the course of any proceedings. It is a settled law that lex specialis derogat legi generali i.e. more specific provisions prevail over general. In the present case the Assessing Officer has specifically mentioned the assessment years for which he intends to initiate the penalty proceedings. Therefore, only mentioning at the end of the assessment order that penalty proceedings are initiated without recording such satisfaction in the speci .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d for issue of notice either concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Hon ble Karnataka High Court in case of CIT vs. M/s Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory & Ors.(2013) 359 ITR 565 (Karn) has held that in penalty notice issued by the Assessing Officer, it should be specific in the notice itself that penalty either issued for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Sending printed form where all the grounds mentioned in sect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Gujarat High Court in the case of Manu Engineering 122 ITR 306 and the Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of Virgo Marketing 171 Taxman 156 have held that levy of penalty has to be clear as to the limb for which it is levied and the position being unclear penalty is not sustainable. Therefore, in issuing the notice U/s 274, the Assessing Officer should be specific either on concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The ld Assessing Officer in the pres .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld AR that the approval memo on the basis of which addition is made represents the outstanding debtors as on the date of search. The assessee in his statement u/s 132(4) has categorically stated that in his trade the goods are generally purchased and sold in cash but where the payment is not received in cash, it is recorded on such approval memo. Thus, these approval memo indicate outstanding amount on the particular date mentioned therein. The year in which sales is made which has resulted int .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n such approval memo though such debtors have arisen as a result of trading transaction of earlier years. Except these approval memos, there is no material on record to hold that it is out of the income of that particular year. Hence, only because the addition of debtors is confirmed in a particular assessment year it cannot be held to be undisclosed income of that year so as to attract levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) ignoring that the assessee has paid tax along with interest on such income offer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y proceedings U/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. A reference of initiation of penalty is sufficient satisfaction of the Assessing Officer. He further argued that as per Section (1B) of Section 271(1)(c), the deeming provision has been inserted in the Act as per this section only initiation of penalty proceedings is required to be used for Assessing Officer s satisfaction. Therefore, he prayed to confirm the order of the ld CIT(A). 6. We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s 274 read with Section 271-272 of the Act dated 30/10/2009 issued as under:- U/s 271(1)(c):- Concealed particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income . It is apparent from the initiation as well as issue of notice that Assessing Officer has not specifically specified that penalty proceedings either issued for concealed particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income. The amended provisions of Section (1B) was challenged before the Hon'ble Delhi High .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. U/s 271(1)(c) to initiate penalty proceedings, the pre-requisites should obtain (i) the Assessing Officer should be satisfied that: (a) the assessee has either concealed particulars of his income; or (b) furnished inaccurate particulars of income; or (c) infracted both (a) & (b). (ii) This satisfaction should be arrived at during the course of any proceedings. These could be assessment, reassessment or rectification proceedings, but not penalty p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: REGISTRETION

Forum: On what Value tax to be deducted at source (TDS)

Highlight: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods. - Notification no. 1/2017 as amended vide notification dated 22-9-2017

Notification: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods.

Highlight: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards - Tenure of the NACAS extended from one year to two years

Notification: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force - "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary"

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version