Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS Versus MARIGOLD COATINGS PVT. LTD

Cenvat credit on the inputs on the basis of documents endorsed by the consignee - Duty paying document - Availing modvat credit on duty paid inputs under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Held that:- in exercise of powers under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government under notification dated 30.3.1994 prescribed invoices issued by a manufacturer from his factory or depot or wholesale distributor or dealer of a manufacturer who has bought the excisable goods .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Excise Officer containing the details, as are prescribed under Rule 57GG as the documents for the purpose of Rule 57G. In other words, subject to fulfilling the conditions provided in the said notifications, the invoices issued by the said category of persons would qualify a manufacturer to avail cenvat credit on the inputs used. This decision was completely lost sight of by the Tribunal. We find that major changes were made in the procedure prescribed in availing cenvat credit. By virtue of suc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

R.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. This tax appeal was admitted for consideration of the following substantial question of law : Whether the Tribunal has erred in taking into account, the endorsed invoices for allowing Modvat credit, contrary to the provisions of Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944? 2. The question arises in the following background. The respondent assessee was engaged in the manufacture of NES powder and liquid chemical falling under Chapters 38, 28 and 27 of the Central Excise .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Metal Treatments Ltd. who had endorsed the invoices in favour of the assessee on the basis of which assessee had taken modvat credit. According to the department, these endorsed invoices could not be used for claiming modvat credit as per Rule 57G( 2) of the Rules as amended. The department therefore, issued a show cause notice to the assessee calling upon it to show cause why the modvat credit taken to the tune of ₹ 7,00,310/on the strength of invoices consigned first to M/s. PyreneRai Me .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g authority disallowed the modvat credit totalling to ₹ 23,06,261/and imposed penalty of ₹ 1,25,000/under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules. The order passed by the adjudicating authority was challenged by the assessee before the Commissioner (Appeals) who by his order dated 23.6.99 confirmed the order passed by the authorities below and rejected the appeal making the following observations : To avoid the duty paying documents being endorsed number of times leading to dispute ove .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sued during the period 22.05.95 to 28.09.95 (May'95 to Sept.'95) were endorsed by M/s. Pyrene Rai Metal Treatment Pvt. Ltd in favour of the appellants. The appellant also admitted in their appeal memorandum as well as at the time of personal hearing that they had taken modvat credit on the endorsed invoices. Therefore, the arguments of the appellants that modvat credit was available on endorsed invoices is not acceptable. The appellants have wrongly taken modvat credit on the endorsed in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gement allowed the appeal and reversed the decisions of the revenue authority making the following observations : 6. In the case of M/s. Crop Health Products Ltd, vs. CCI, Meerut reported in 1998 (102) ELT 376 (Tribunal),it is held that the appellants are entitled to Modvat credit although invoices were issued in the name of the other company, the goods were manufactured by the appellants on behalf of another company, the appellants received goods and used in manufacture of final product. 7. In .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rie & Co. ltd vs. CCE. Kanpur2000( 116) ELT 364(Tribunal), it was held the same principle as in the case of M/s. Guric Chem Pvt. Ltd. 9. In the case of CCE, Mumbai vs. M/s. Goodlass Nerolac Paints ltd.1986( 26) ELT 57(Tribunal), it was observed that in order to claim proforma credit, it is not essential that the manufacturer, who availed proforma credit, should be shown as the consignee in GPI or there should be a subsidiary gate pass in his name. These prescriptions are under Trade Notices, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

production of certain documents, the assessee would be eligible for taking cenvat credit. The Tribunal ignored the decision of larger Bench in case of Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Kanpur reported in 2000 (116) ELT 364 (Tribunal). No one appeared for the respondent. 6. From the above discussion, it can be seen that the short controversy that arises in this appeal is whether respondent assessee was entitled to take cenvat credit on the inputs on the basis of documents en .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of said Rules. Likewise, under notification dated 4.7.1994, the Central Government had prescribed invoices issued by a manufacturer from the factory or his depot or dealer of an excisable goods registered with the Central Excise Officer or an importer from his godown or dealer of an imported goods registered with the Central Excise Officer containing the details, as are prescribed under Rule 57GG as the documents for the purpose of Rule 57G. In other words, subject to fulfilling the conditions p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version