Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

STATE OF GUJARAT Versus ESSAR STEEL LTD

Nature of amount deposited - deposited as per order of Tribunal - Whether by way of pre-deposit or payment of tax - Held that:- as per provisions of sub-section (4) of section 73 of the GVAT Act, it appears that while the amount deposited under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and section 129E of the Customs Act is by way of deposit pending the appeal, the amount paid under sub-section (4) of section 73 of the GVAT Act appears to be in the nature of payment of tax. However, it is not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tter of challenge before the Tribunal. Therefore, the amount deposited by the respondent being in the nature of pre-deposit, once the Tribunal has allowed the appeals and decided the same in favour of the respondent, the consequence would be automatic and the respondent would be entitled to refund of the amount paid by way of predeposit.

Refund of excess amount of tax paid - Section 36 of the GVAT Act - Petitioner submitted that the expression used is “paid” which is distinct from the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ery of any amount due under the Act or the earlier laws and shall then refund only the balance amount, if any; provided further that no adjustment under the provision shall be made towards a recovery of an amount due that has been stayed by an appellate authority. On a perusal of the provisions of section 36 of the GVAT Act as a whole, there is nothing therein to indicate that the same requires an application to be made prior to refund of any amount by a person. Moreover, what section 36 of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in the nature of pre-deposit and not payment of tax under the provisions of the Sales Tax Act, the amount deposited by it is bound to be refunded in view of the fact that the appeal has been allowed by the Tribunal.

Whether the Tribunal acted within the bounds of its jurisdiction in issuing directions of the refund of amount deposited by the respondent by way of pre-deposit pursuant to the above order passed by this court - Held that:- as per provisions of GVAT Act, it is evident tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l shall, in any matter not provided for in these regulations, follow the procedure, as far as it is applicable, laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as may be amended from time to time. Having regard to the similarity of the provisions under two regulations, the court is of the view that the decision of this court in the case of Girishchandra R. Bhatt v. Dineshbhai V. Sanghvi, Principal and others [1995 (12) TMI 388 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] would be squarely applicable to the facts of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssment orders would not spring into operation entitling the petitioner to recover the amount under the same. The impugned order passed by the Tribunal, therefore, cannot, in any manner, be said to come in conflict with any order that may be passed by the High Court in the appeals. Having regard to distinct nature of the proceedings before the High Court and before the Tribunal, it cannot be said that the order passed by the Tribunal lacks propriety. - Decided against the revenue. - SPECIAL CIVIL .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ough the Commissioner of Commercial Tax, challenging the common orders dated 23.07.2015 and 14.10.2015 in Miscellaneous Application No.74 of 2015 and common order dated 14.10.2015 passed in Rectification Application No.55 of 2015 passed by the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ). 2. Since all the petitions are directed against common orders of the Tribunal and the parties as well as the facts of the case are common, the same were taken up for hearing toget .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

issued to the respondent in the year 2005, which came to be challenged by it before this court by way of writ petitions being Special Civil application No.14422 of 2005 and allied matters. Subsequently in July 2005, by separate orders passed in relation to Unit I and Unit II, the demand of sales tax came to be confirmed and penalty of 150% came to be levied by the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax. Notices seeking to impose penalty also came to be issued by the Commissioner of Sales Tax to Units .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

matters, the court, after discussing the merits of the case, was of the view that the petitioner Company (respondent herein) had not only made out a strong case for waiver of penalty and interest, but had also made out a strong case for exemption from deposit of the tax amount till final disposal of the appeals/revisions filed by the petitioner Company in respect of Unit I. As regards Unit II, the court was inclined to direct the petitioner company to make pre-deposit of 50% of only the tax amou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

liable to pay any tax, interest or penalty on the disputed transactions and there is no question of enhancement of penalty as prayed for by the Department in the cross objections. 5. Since, pursuant to the orders passed by the Tribunal, the amount paid by the respondent by way of pre-deposit was not refunded to it, the respondent moved the above referred Miscellaneous Applications No.74 to 77 of 2015 before the Tribunal in the above referred second appeals, stating that by the order dated 29.01. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n filed before the Tribunal being Revision Applications No.34 to 39 of 2015, wherein the stand of the Department is that the payment of ₹ 212 crores made by the respondent relates to Unit II and hence, the penalty levied by the revision orders for Unit I cannot be adjusted and the respondent is liable to make payment towards the dues. It was the case of the respondent that if the payment made by it is treated as made only for Unit No.2 and it is, therefore, required to make payment towards .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct. 6. It appears that the Tribunal took up the above applications for hearing along with Revision Applications No.34 to 39 of 2015 filed by the respondent against revision orders relating to Unit I. By a common order dated 27.07.2015, the Tribunal while admitting the revision applications and granting stay against recovery of the outstanding demand, had also directed the Department either to grant refund to the respondent which would be payable as a result of the orders passed by the Tribunal i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t Commissioner who prepared the statement was directed to remain personally present before it on 14.10.2015. The revision applications and the miscellaneous applications were kept for further hearing on 14.10.2015. On 14.10.2015, the petitioner moved rectification applications before the Tribunal being Rectification Application No.55 to 58 of 2015, which came to be disposed of on the same day, by directing the petitioner to grant refund to the respondent Company as per the earlier order passed b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itting that the Tribunal by issuing directions for refund of the amount deposited by the respondent, has exceeded its jurisdiction. It was contended that once the Tribunal decided the second appeals, it became functus officio and could not have thereafter passed any order in those proceedings. Therefore, the impugned order to the extent it relates to the miscellaneous applications filed in the second appeals is without jurisdiction. It was pointed out that against the orders of the Tribunal, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

phatically argued that the revisions filed by the respondent before the Tribunal, have no bearing on the facts of the second appeal and therefore, the Tribunal was not justified in clubbing the proceedings of the revision applications and the present applications for directions. 8.1 In support of her submissions, the learned Government Pleader placed reliance upon an unreported decision of this court in the case of State of Gujarat v. Essar Oil Ltd. rendered on 01.05.2015 in Tax Appeal No.254 of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ind the decision of the Tribunal in the case of ONGC Limited in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of the order. The Tribunal also passed further orders directing that if the appeals are not decided within the stipulated period the amount paid by the dealer pursuant to its interim order shall be refunded and that once the existing bank guarantee expires, it shall not be required to be renewed. The Tribunal passed the above order despite the fact that it was brought .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Tribunal could not have insisted for disposing of the appeals by the first appellate authority following its earlier decision in the case of ONGC Limited, which are the subject matter of appeals before this court and that too, within a stipulated period of time. 8.2 Reference was made to the provisions of section 78 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the GVAT Act ), to point out that against the order of the Tribunal, appeal lies to the High Court. It was subm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tribunal is 90 days; in the present case, the time limit for filing appeals expired on 29.04.2015 and there was a delay of 54 days in filing the appeals and hence, applications for condonation of delay had been filed. It was submitted that when the delay condonation applications were pending consideration before the court, the Tribunal ought to have stayed its hands and refrained from issuing any directions for grant of refund. 8.3 Referring to the order dated 28.03.2006 made in Special Civil Ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Tribunal became functus officio and did not have any jurisdiction to entertain the miscellaneous applications. It was contended that the fact that such question was not raised before the Tribunal would not preclude the petitioner from raising it before this court, it being a pure question of law. 9 Opposing the petitions, Mr. Mihir Joshi, Senior Advocate, learned counsel with Mr. Keyur Gandhi, learned advocate for M/s Nanavati Associates, learned advocates for the respondent, invited the atte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

evying tax, interest and penalty, subject to the condition that the petitioner Company deposits 50% of only the tax amount levied in respect of the Unit II within the time stipulated in the order (i.e. 50% of ₹ 423 crores as indicated in Annexure-II to the order). It was submitted that what was deposited pursuant to the order of this court was by way of pre-deposit for entertaining the appeals preferred by the respondent. Such deposit was to enure till the proceedings are decided by the Tr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

moment the appeal came to be decided in favour of the respondent, the petitioner was duty bound to return the pre-deposit amount without the respondent being required to make any application in that regard. It was submitted that since the amount was not returned, the respondent was constrained to approach the Tribunal seeking directions for return of pre-deposit. 9.1 Reliance was placed upon the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Suvidhe Ltd. v. Union of India, 1996 (82) ELT 177 (B .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

osit is required to be returned. It was urged that the Tribunal, therefore, was wholly justified in passing the impugned order, which is only consequential to the earlier order passed by the Tribunal. Reliance was also placed upon the decision of a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in the case of Nelco Limited v. Union of India, 2002 (144) ELT 56, for the proposition that the amount deposited under section 35F of the Central Excise Act as a condition precedent, for hearing of appeal, does .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

being public authorities are bound to respect the declaration of law. It was submitted that therefore, once the Tribunal had allowed the appeals filed by the respondent, the petitioner herein was bound to implement the same and return the amount deposited by the respondent by way of pre-deposit without any direction from the Tribunal. 9.2 Next, it was submitted that merely because the GVAT Act does not make any provision for implementation of the order of the Tribunal, does not mean that the Tri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

invited to the provisions of the Gujarat Primary Education Tribunal (Procedure) Order, 1987 referred to in the said judgment as well as the corresponding provisions of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal Regulations, 2008, to point out that similar provisions are contained in the Order of 1987 as well as in the Regulations of 2008 and therefore, the said decision would be squarely applicable to the present case. 9.3 As regards the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner that in respect o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the present case. It was submitted that in any case, unlike section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, section 36 of the said Act does not contemplate making of an application. Referring to the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 36 of the said Act, which provides that where any refund is due to any dealer, according to the return furnished by him for any period, such refund may provisionally be adjusted by him against the tax due and payable as per the returns furnished under section 29 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case, for six months, no order had been passed under section 39 of the said Act and hence, the Tribunal was justified in directing refund of the amount deposited by way of pre-deposit. Moreover, it is a settled practice before the Tribunal whereby such applications for refund are routinely made and the orders are passed thereon, however, in none of those cases, such orders have been challenged. It was submitted that there is no alternative procedure for return of the amount in case of pre-depos .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot revive the assessment order so as to entitle the petitioner to recover the amount determined thereunder. It was submitted that the appeals before this court are completely unconnected with the subject matter of this petition and that the amount deposited by the respondent being in the nature of pre-deposit, has no connection with the appeals before this court. It was urged that the pre-deposit enures till the appeal before the Tribunal is decided and has no connection with the appeal before t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the respective parties and has perused the record and proceedings as produced before the court and the judgement and order dated 28.03.2006 made in Special Civil Application No.14422 of 2008 as well as the paper-book as was filed before the Tribunal, which has been submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent. 11. The record of the case reveals that what was subject matter of challenge before this court in Special Civil Application No.14422 of 2005 and allied matters, were the notices dat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the GVAT Act. The court, in its order dated 28.03.2006, observed that ordinarily, when the disputes are subject matter of appeals/revisions, this court would not entertain the petitions, but for the reasons set out in the order, the court had gone into the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the respective sides for the limited purpose of considering the question of pre-deposit. Insofar as Unit I is concerned, the court found that a prima facie case had been made out, inter alia, for e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ery of any tax, interest or penalty in respect of unit No. 1 of the petitioner Company for the period from 1995-96 till 2004-05 on the ground that HBI manufactured by the petitioner Company in its unit No. 1 at Hazira with the tax free purchase of raw materials was transferred to unit No.2 of the petitioner Company for the purpose of manufacturing HRC, if ultimately the final product was sold within the State of Gujarat. B. As far as the liabilities of the petitioner Company in respect of unit N .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tax amount for the period from 1995-96 to 2004-05 shall be first reduced by ₹ 75 crores already deposited and the balance amount shall be deposited in twelve equal monthly installments. The first such installments shall commence from 31st May 2006 and last such installment shall be deposited by 30th April, 2007. C. These interim directions shall operate during pendency of the appeals/revisions before the appellate authority/tribunal subject to the condition that on behalf of the petitione .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l of the appeals/revisions before the appellate authority/Tribunal and in order to ensure that there are no multiplicity of proceedings, the Tribunal shall decide the revisions as expeditiously as possible and preferably by 30th June, 2007. The deposits shall, therefore, enure for stay of operation, implementation and execution of the impugned orders till all the proceedings are decided by the Tribunal. (ii) xxx (iii) xxx E. It is clarified that the revisional/ appellate authority is at liberty .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ither regarding the merits of the disputes or the preliminary contentions sought to be raised by the petitioner Company. From the language employed in the above order, it is apparent that the amount which the respondent has been directed to pay is by way of pre-deposit for entertaining the appeals and not towards payment of tax levied under the orders which were subject matter of challenge before the Tribunal. 12. In this backdrop, the merits of the rival submissions have to be examined. 13. Ins .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an order of assessment shall ordinarily be entertained by an appellate authority, unless such appeal is accompanied by satisfactory proof of payment of the tax in respect of which an appeal has been preferred; Provided that an appellate authority may, if it thinks fit, for reasons to be recorded in writing, entertain an appeal against such order - (a) without payment of tax with penalty (if any) or, as the case may be, of the penalty, or (b) on proof of payment of such smaller sum as it may con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of payment of tax. However, it is not necessary to enter into any discussion in that regard, inasmuch as, in the present case, the amount deposited by the respondent is not under subsection (4) of section 73 of the GVAT Act, nor has the appellate authority passed any order under the proviso to subsection (4) of section 73 of the GVAT Act. 15. In the facts of the present case, this court, in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has directed the respondent to make a p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s and shall enure till the final disposal of the appeals/revisions before the appellate authority/Tribunal and that the deposits shall enure for stay of operation, implementation and execution of the impugned orders till all the proceedings are decided by the Tribunal. 16. On a plain reading of the directions issued by this court, it is evident that the same envisage that upon the respondent Company depositing 50% of the tax amount, further recovery under the orders impugned before the Tribunal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vour of the respondent, the consequence would be automatic and the respondent would be entitled to refund of the amount paid by way of predeposit. 17. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that, upon the appeals being adjudicated in favour of the respondent, the respondent ipso facto does not become entitled to return of the amount deposited by it as a condition precedent for entertaining the appeal and that a refund application would be required to be made under the provisions of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

irst apply such excess towards the recovery of any amount due under the Act or the earlier laws and shall then refund only the balance amount, if any; provided further that no adjustment under the provision shall be made towards a recovery of an amount due that has been stayed by an appellate authority. On a perusal of the provisions of section 36 of the GVAT Act as a whole, there is nothing therein to indicate that the same requires an application to be made prior to refund of any amount by a p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ection 36 of the GVAT Act. 19. Section 37 of the GVAT Act makes provision for provisional refund and section 38 makes provision for interest on refund and are not relevant for the present purpose. Section 39 of the GVAT Act provides for power to withhold refund in certain cases and lays down that where an order giving rise to a refund is the subject matter of an appeal or further proceeding or where any other proceeding under the Act is pending and the Commissioner is of the opinion that grant o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g rise to a refund is the subject matter of an appeal or further proceeding or where any other proceeding under the Act is pending and the Commissioner is of the opinion that grant of such refund is likely to adversely affect the revenue, he may withhold such amount, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the party. In the opinion of this court, the question of refund under section 39 of the GVAT Act would arise provided there is a payment of tax. Though the expression refund may also be used .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the appeal. Besides, assuming for the sake of argument that the provisions of section 39 of the GVAT Act are applicable to the facts of the present case, from the facts as emerging from the record, there is nothing to show that the Commissioner has withheld the amount deposited by the respondent in exercise of powers under section 39 of the said Act after recording satisfaction as envisaged therein. Therefore, no cause has been made out by the petitioner for withholding the amount deposited b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

authority to hold on to the amount deposited by the respondent by way of pre-deposit for stay of recovery of the demand that had arisen under the orders impugned before the Tribunal. As held by the Bombay High Court in the case of Suvidhe Ltd. v. Union of India (supra), a deposit under section 35F of the Central Excise Rules and Act, 1994 is not a payment of duty, but only a pre-deposit for availing the right of appeal. Such amount is bound to be refunded when the appeal is allowed with conseque .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of pre-deposit pursuant to the above order passed by this court. On a perusal of the provisions of the GVAT Act, it is evident that there is no provision therein for return of the amount deposited by way of pre-deposit during the pendency of the appeal. In this regard, it may be apposite to refer to the decision of this court in the case of Girishchandra R. Bhatt v. Dineshbhai V. Sanghvi, Principal and others (supra), wherein the court has held thus: 22. Xxxxx Clause 7 providing for stay of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thout any power to enforce its own orders, Clause 14 provides to meet that exigency. xxxxx To make adjudication complete and effective, clause 14 provides for application of provisions to follow the procedure of Code of Civil Procedure as far as it is applicable. This may also be read to provide for the enforcement or execution of the order as per the procedure prescribed in the Civil Procedure Code. This is how the Civil Procedure Code is brought in by clause 14. It will be relevant to refer th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he same. Right to adjudicate would be incomplete in absence of power to execute. 23. A perusal of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal Regulation, 2008 shows that the same contains provisions which are in pari materia to that of the Gujarat Primary Education Tribunal (Procedure) Order, 1987. Regulation 44 bears the heading Tribunal to follow provisions of Civil Procedure Code in the matters not provided in these regulations and postulates that the Tribunal shall, in any matter not provided for i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a), on which reliance has been placed by the learned counsel for the respondent, wherein the court has made reference to the following observations of the Supreme Court in the case of Smt. Savitri v. Gobind Singh Rawal, AIR 1986 SC 984 : Every Court must be deemed to possess by necessary intendment all such powers as are necessary to make its orders effective. This principle is embodied in the maxim 'ubi aliquid conceditur, conceditur ed id sine quo res ipsa esse non potest (where anything i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the legislation under consideration. A contrary view is likely to result in grave hardship to the applicant, who may have no means to subsist until the final order is passed. There is no room for the apprehension that the recognition of such implied power would lead to the passing of interim orders in a large number of cases where the liability to pay maintenance may not exist. It is quite possible that such contingency may arise in a few cases but the prejudice caused thereby to the person aga .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the Tribunal in Second Appeals No.420 to 423 of 2015 with Cross Objections No.2 to 2C of 2013, whereas the applications filed before the Tribunal were for the return of the amount of pre-deposit. In the opinion of this court, refund of the amount of pre-deposit is consequential of the orders of the Tribunal and the same has no connection with the appeals preferred by the petitioner before this court. As rightly submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent, even if the orders of the Tri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version