GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (5) TMI 304 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

2016 (5) TMI 304 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT - 2016 (331) E.L.T. 236 (Chhattisgarh) - Whether the Tribunal was justified in making proper determination of the annual production capacity of the Respondent/Assessee plant in conformity with relevant rules applicable for such re-determination and whether impugned re-determination made by the Tribunal can be said to be in conformity with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise v. Doaba Steel Rolling Mills [2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld then determine the date from which the changed installed capacity shall be deemed effective.

By deeming fiction, subject to compliance with Rule 4(2), the actual production, if less in the subsequent year, was to be determined for Excise duty on basis of actual production for the year 1996-1997. Any changes made in the annual production capacity on 30-7-1997, according to the respondent itself was communicated to the department after insertion of the amended Rule 5. The annual pro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed:- 29-9-2015 - Navin Sinha, C.J. and P. Sam Koshy, J. Shri Maneesh Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Ramakant Mishra, Advocate, for the Respondent. JUDGMENT [Judgment per : Navin Sinha, C.J.]. - The original Central Excise Reference Case No. 66 of 2000 under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter called the Act ) before its repeal, was made against the order dated 26-4-2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter cal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

can be said to be in conformity with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2010) 14 SCC 751 = 2011 (269) E.L.T. 298 (S.C.) (Commissioner of Central Excise v. Doaba Steel Rolling Mills)? 2. Learned Counsel for the Revenue submits that the Tribunal committed gross error in not taking into consideration the amendment made to the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 (hereinafter called the Rules ) by insertion of Rule 5 by Notificat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mmissioner in his notice dated 13-10-1997, which was assailed before the Tribunal noticed that the Respondent had communicated the change in d = nominal center distance of the pinions stand in millimeter changes had been made on 30-7-1997 but was communicated only on 1-9-1997 without complying with the provisions of Rule 4(2). In the circumstances, the Tribunal erred in holding that the last year s actual production figure was not a relevant consideration. The controversy stands settled in Doaba .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

for assessment of production capacity for payment of excise duty. It was duly intimated to the department on 1-9-1997. The order of the Tribunal does not suffer from any infirmity and calls for no interference. 5. We have considered the submissions on behalf of the parties. 6. Section 3A(2) of the Act empowers the Central Government to charge excise duty on the annual production capacity to be determined in the manner prescribed under Rule 3. If a manufacturer proposes to make any cha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sub-rule (3) of Rule 3 in respect of a mill, is less than the actual production of the mill during the Financial Year 1996-1997, then the annual capacity so determined shall be deemed to be equal to the actual production of the mill during the Financial Year 1996-1997. 8. By deeming fiction, subject to compliance with Rule 4(2), the actual production, if less in the subsequent year, was to be determined for Excise duty on basis of actual production for the year 1996-1997. Any changes made .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version