TMI Blog2015 (7) TMI 1088X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ery purpose of the RTI Act, 2005 for which it was legislated by Parliament of India. It is also admitted fact that, as on date, respondents failed to provide the required information to the appellant. As such, the Commission feels that it would be appropriate and even justified to allow the appellant’s second appeal in toto instead of remanding back to learned FAA for disposal of FA which is even ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ecord. III. The First Appeal (FA) was filed on NIL, as desired information not provided. IV. First Appellate Authority (FAA), Order is not on record. V. Grounds for the Second Appeal filed on 29-4-2015, are contained in the Memorandum of Appeal. Hearing Appellant as well as respondent appeared before the Commission personally and made the submissions at length. Dec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 3. The Commission again posed a query to him, as to whether appellant s FA dated NIL filed before the learned FAA was disposed of or still pending. On this very aspect, it is submitted by Shri Mashhood-ur Rehman, that FA filed by the appellant could not be disposed of by the learned FAA. However, he could not explain the reasons for non-disposal of the first appeal. Thus, it shows that officers o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... which it was legislated by Parliament of India. It is also admitted fact that, as on date, respondents failed to provide the required information to the appellant. As such, the Commission feels that it would be appropriate and even justified to allow the appellant s second appeal in toto instead of remanding back to learned FAA for disposal of FA which is even more time consuming. Therefore, it i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
