GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (5) TMI 457 - ITAT DELHI

2016 (5) TMI 457 - ITAT DELHI - TMI - Disallowance u/s 37(1) - additional payment in violation of Stamp Duty Act, 1899 - Held that:- Since the material issue is that the said payment was never claimed by the assessee as business expenditure, the occasion to make a disallowance of the same does not arise. There is no dispute on the fact that the expenditure was not claimed as an expense by the assessee. In the circumstances, the occasion to make an addition of the same by way of a disallowance do .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of assessee

Deemed dividend addition u/s 2(22) - Held that:- The assessee company is not a registered shareholder of the payer companies who have advanced loans to the assessee company. Thus we hold that the amount is not taxable as deemed dividend in the hands of the assessee company u/s 2(22)(e) of the Act as the assessee company is not a shareholder of the payer companies - Decided against revenue - ITA No. 1675/Del/2013, ITA No. 1761/Del/2013 - Dated:- 10-2-2016 - Shri J. Sudhaka .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The facts of the case, as borne from the records, are that the assessee is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of Real Estate. Return of income declaring an income of ₹ 408,225/- was filed on 20.11.2006 and subsequently the assessee s case was selected for scrutiny. During the year under consideration, the assessee had purchased land from farmers/villagers and after taking over p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

her business other than that of acquiring land from the villages through registered sale deeds and transferring the land so acquired to M/s Country Wide Promoters (Pvt.) Ltd. The Assessing Officer noted that a sum of ₹ 67,18,002/- was paid in cash towards the purchase of land to different parties, and as, according to him, the land purchased constituted stock-in-trade of the assessee, he disallowed a sum equal to 20% of the amount paid in cash (being ₹ 13,43,600/-) u/s 40A(3) of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee went into appeal before the Ld. CIT (A) wherein the Ld. CIT (A) upheld the disallowance made u/s 40A (3) but deleted the addition pertaining to deemed dividend. As far as the issue of disallowance of additional payment was concerned, the Ld. CIT (A) held that additional payment was not illegal under any provisions of the Stamp Act and was not hit by Explanation to section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. He, however, upheld the disallowance to the extent the additional payments we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in violation of Stamp Duty Act, 1899. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of ₹ 7,96,743/-, made by the Assessing Officer in view of the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income tax Act, 1961 on account of deemed dividend. 5. On the issue of additional payments made for the purchase of land, the Ld. DR submitted that the assessee is not entitled to claim the deduction of this additional payment because there is no considera .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ights were already with the assessee company. He further submitted that the amount of additional payments have been added to the cost of the land and no stamp duty has been paid on the said additional payment which means that the assessee company has claimed in its books all the payments which have been made over and above the sale consideration as described in the sale deed and on which no stamp duty has been paid to the Government. As per Indian Stamps Act, prosecution proceedings can be initi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itself, in order to buy peace of mind and to avoid any litigation with the department, it had offered the same to be taxed as deemed dividend and thus, the Ld. CIT(A) has wrongly deleted the addition. He submitted that the order of the Assessing Officer should be restored on both the counts. 7. The assessee has raised as many as six grounds of appeal. However, the main ground pertaining to the issue of disallowance u/s 40A (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is ground no. 4, which reads as under:- 4 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has made an incorrect observation that the assessee had transferred the land to M/s Country Wide Promoters Pvt. Ltd. He submitted that the Assessing Officer has drawn a wrong inference that the land was acquired as a stock in trade. He submitted that the assessee had not claimed any deduction in respect of cost of land in the computation of total income under the head business income and therefore section 40A(3) was not applicable. Since no deduction has been claimed, no disallowance can be made .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2/Mum/2008 (iii) CIT vs Ankitech Pvt. Ltd. 11 Taxmann.com 100 (Del) (iv) CIT vs Navyug Promoters Pvt. Ltd. 16 Txmann.com 292 (Del) (v) CIT vs Marketing P. Ltd. 16 Taxmann.com 411 (Del) 10. On the issue of additional payment towards purchase of land, the Ld. AR submitted that the additional payment recorded has not been claimed as an expense, therefore, no disallowance was called for in assessee s case and in any case the cost has been reimbursed by M/s Country Wide Promoters (P) Ltd to the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Jurisdictional High Court has held in the case of CIT vs Ankitech (P) Ltd. (supra) as under:- Further, it is an admitted case that under normal circumstances, such a loan or advance given to the shareholders or to a concern, would not qualify as dividend. It has been made so by legal fiction created under section 2(22) (e) of the Act. We have to keep in mind that this legal provision relates to dividend . Thus by a deeming provision, it is the definition of dividend which is enlarged. Legal fic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

viz. a concern (like the assessee herein), which is given the loan or advance is admittedly not a shareholder/member of the payer company. Therefore, under no circumstance, it could be treated as shareholder/member receiving dividend. If the intention of the Legislature was to tax such loan or advance as deemed dividend at the hands of deeming shareholder then the Legislature would have inserted deeming provision in respect of shareholder as well, that has not happened. Most of the arguments of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hands of such concerns which is not a shareholder, and that affording to us is the correct legal position, such a circular would be of no avail. 13. Respectfully following the decision of the Hon'ble High Court, we hold that the amount of ₹ 796,743/- is not taxable as deemed dividend in the hands of the assessee company u/s 2(22)(e) of the Act as the assessee company is not a shareholder of the payer companies. Hence, this ground of appeal of the Department is rejected. 14. As far as t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee as business expenditure, the occasion to make a disallowance of the same does not arise. There is no dispute on the fact that the expenditure was not claimed as an expense by the assessee. In the circumstances, the occasion to make an addition of the same by way of a disallowance does not arise. Accordingly, we hold that the disallowance of ₹ 875,000/- on account of additional payments was wrongly made by the Assessing Officer. Moreover, the partial sustenance of this addition .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he AO, which has been upheld by the Ld. CIT (A), was never claimed as an expense by the assessee. Section 40A starts with the non-obstante clause setting out that the provisions of this section shall have effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other provisions of the Act relating to the computation of income under the head profits and gains of business or profession . Sub-section (3) of section 40A is an exception to the deductibility of expenditure under the computatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lear in as much as when the assessee has not claimed any deduction of any expenditure the question of not allowing any part of that expenditure as deduction does not arise. For readyreference, we extract the relevant finding of their Lordships from the said judgement:- In our view, a bare reading of the language of this sub-section is enough to show, that in the circumstances of the case, provisions of s.40A(3) are not attracted with respect to either of the transactions; obviously because it on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7; 7,35,000 and therefore, there is no question of not allowing any part of that expenditure, as deduction. Thus, the finding arrived at in this regard, by the learned CIT (A), and the learned Tribunal cannot be said to be wrong. Question No.2 is accordingly answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. 17. Similarly, it is seen that the judgement of the Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs Alpha Toyo Ltd. (2008) 174 Taxmann 427 (P & H) also fully suppo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version