Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Neo Sports Broadcast Pvt. Ltd. Versus Principal Commissioner of Income-10, Mumbai

Revision u/s 263 - non deduction of tds on reimbursement of expenses - Held that:- We find that bank guarantee charges paid by assessee to NCL was neither payment for carrying out any work nor it is made towards broadcasting and telecasting services. From the agreement entered into by the assessee with NCL, it is clear that bank guarantee is to be provided to BCCI as joint and several liability of both the parties and therefore reimbursement of bank guarantee commission to NCL is with respect to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

NCL on payment of bank guarantee commission is merely a reimbursement. In the light of the above, we are of the view that tax is not required to be deducted from bank guarantee commission in the absence of agent/principal relation. Consequently tax is not required to be deducted from reimbursement of actual expenses by assessee as incurred by NCL under any of the provisions of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee

Short deduction of TDS on the payment made to Noida Software Techno .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e is no shortfall in tax to be deducted. In this regard the issue of the assessee is very clear on merits also that assessee has rightly deducted tax @ 2% u/s. 194C of the Act on payments made to Noida Software Technology Park Ltd. Even otherwise in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of S.K. Tekriwal, [2012 (12) TMI 873 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] wherein it has been held that if there is any shortfall due to any difference of opinion as to taxability of an item or na .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

66/Mum/2015 - Dated:- 1-4-2016 - SHRI R.C. SHARMA, AM AND SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM For The Appellant : Dr. K. Shivaram Respondent For The Respondent : Shri N.P. Singh ORDER PER MAHAVIR SINGH, JM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the revision order of Principal CIT-10, Mumbai passed u/s. 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) vide order dated 23.03.2015. The assessment was framed by DCIT (OSD) Range-8(1), Mumbai u/s. 143(3) of the Act for AY 2010-11 vid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the issue, therefore, order passed u/s 263 of the Act is liable to be quashed. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT erred in setting aside the order passed u/s 143(3) dated 06-03-2013 with the direction to the AO to make assessment afresh after proper verification of the facts and law applicable thereto. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the CIT-10, Mumbai issued Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 22.09.2014 stating that the assessment framed under section 143(3) dated .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sequently, NCL entered into an agreement with the assessee on 27.11.2007 and assessee agreed to reimburse 80% of the bank guarantee to NCL. BCCI was not a party to the agreement between the assessee and NCL. Accordingly, as per the CIT, the assessee was under obligation to deduct TDS @2% on such reimbursement of expenses but was not done by the assessee. Similarly, another issue in this revision proceeding is that the assessee has paid a sum of ₹ 45 lakhs to Noida Software Technology Park .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stage this issue would be raised it will tantamount to change in opinion, but the CIT was of the view that the assessee has not deducted TDS on reimbursement and there is shortfall of TDS in respect of payments to Noida Software Technologies Park Ltd. amounting to ₹ 45 lakhs and hence the assessment frames by the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. Hence, he wrongly directed the AO to make fresh assessment after proper verification of facts and law applicable for t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts of NCL. The agreement between assessee and NCL is towards granting of broadcast rights of cricket matches to be played in India in its TV Channel Neo Cricket. To assure regarding timely and full payment of charges, BCCI had laid down a condition on NCL to provide bank guarantee from certain banks for which NCL has to make payment of bank guarantee charges to banks. Assessee has not provided any guarantee to the NCL for payment of license fees and assessee has deducted TDS under section 194J o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rk for assessee and since the payment is towards reimbursement of actual expenditure without any profit element, it is not covered under section 194C of the Act. With respect to another issue of shortfall in deduction of TDS as pointed out by the CIT in respect of payment of ₹ 45 lakhs to Noida Software Technology Park Ltd. for technical and professional services, the assessee has deducted tax @ 2% as per provisions of section 194C of the Act and this payment does not fall under section 19 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

have heard the rival contentions and gone through the facts and circumstances of the case. The above stated facts are undisputed in respect to the first issue of reimbursement of bank guarantee charges. Now the question arises whether the reimbursement of bank guarantee charges paid by assessee to NCL falls under section 194C of the Act or not. We find that bank guarantee charges paid by assessee to NCL was neither payment for carrying out any work nor it is made towards broadcasting and telecas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f actual expenditure and hence the same cannot be presumed to be covered under section 194C of the Act. Even otherwise assessee has reimbursed 80% of bank guarantee commission reflected under the head Financial expenditure of its audited Profit & Loss Account. The assessee relied upon the CBDC circular No. 715 dated 08.08.1995 wherein CBDT, vide question No. 30 answered the proposition as under: - Q.30: Whether the deduction of tax at source u/s 194C and 194J has to be made out of the gross .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent. In the light of the above, we are of the view that tax is not required to be deducted from bank guarantee commission in the absence of agent/principal relation. Consequently tax is not required to be deducted from reimbursement of actual expenses by assessee as incurred by NCL under any of the provisions of the Act. This issue is squarely covered by the Coordinate Bench decision in assessee s own case, wherein the issue under adjudication was revision proceedings under section 263 of the Ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CL is not income by way of interest. The impugned receipt would be in the nature of reimbursement of expenses incurred by it. In view of the above discussion, we do not find any merit in the order passed u/s. 263 in respect of one of the possible view taken by the AO. Even on merit, we found that bank guarantee commission does not come under the purview of interest so as to make assessee liable for TDS u/s. 194A. In view of the above order of Coordinate Bench in assessee s own case, the issue is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version