Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Sikkim Ferroys Alloys Ltd. and Anr. Versus Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, DivisionEP, MumbaiI

Recovery proceedings - Invokation of Section 11(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Purchase of excisable goods from the shipping broker and cleared during the period from 2 April 2015 to 30 April 2015 - Petitioners claimed that they have made full payment towards value of scrap and central excise duty involved in the purchases from the second Respondent and made payment. - Held that:- if the Revenue has some material in its possession, which enables it to proceed against both the Petitione .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le the Revenue to issue such notice to recover the amount straightway. What are the sums due to the Government would have to be ascertained and thereafter subsection (2) of section 11 will come into play. Therefore, we can not assist the Revenue and the impugned notice is quashed and set aside. - Decided in favour of appellant - WRIT PETITION (L) NO.557 OF 2016 - Dated:- 14-3-2016 - S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr.Jitendra Jain with Mr.Sudhakar G.Kakhani For The Res .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

il 2015 to 30 April 2015 and issue of certain invoices referred in this notice. It is stated that the Respondent No.2 has sold goods worth ₹ 5,45,97,991/involving above Central Excise Duty and the Petitioners are required to pay ₹ 2,14,74,163/to Respondent No.2. However, there is a default in payment of Central Excise Duty to tune of ₹ 68,24,763/by the second Respondent and therefore invoking section 11(2) of the Central Excise Act the Petitioners have been directed to pay the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ral proofs of payments and from the bank directly to the second Respondent have been referred and produced. 5. It is urged that contrary to the stand of the Petitioners and as reflected even in the arbitration proceedings and part of an order passed by this Court on 1 April 2015, the Department insisted on the Petitioner making the payment. 6. The issue has been repeatedly clarified and it has also been pointed out by the Petitioners that some amount has been remitted by the second Respondent an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d my company is going through a financial crisis because of the reasons mentioned therein. However, as I have assured you, I have made payment of ₹ 5,00,000/vide epayment Challan No.00001 dated 19.02.2016 towards the defaulted dues of ₹ 68,24,763/. I request you to kindly bear with me and I shall be making full duty payment along with interest within minimum possible time. Thanking you, Yours faithfully, For I.B.Commercial Pvt.Ltd. Director Copy to: 1. The Assistant Commissioner, Div .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version