Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (5) TMI 887

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Chennai. He remained admitted there from 23.5.2013 to 7.8.2013 and ultimately died on 7.8.2013. The appellant collected the papers from the office of the said counsel after two months from his death and filed the appeal against the order, on 17.10.2013. The appeal was filed late by 120 days. In such circumstances, delay in filing the appeal before the DETC(C) was unintentional and due to the circumstances beyond the control of the appellant. The explanation furnished by the appellant appears to be plausible and, therefore, leads to the conclusion that there was sufficient cause for delay in filing the appeal. Once that was so, the delay in filing the appeal before the DETC(A) deserves to be condoned and appeal heard on merits by the DETC(A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssing authority vide order dated 31.1.2013 (Annexure A-1) under Section 51(7)(c) of the Act imposed penalty of ₹ 6,39,436/-. The copy of the said order was received by the appellant on 14.5.2013 after a passage of more than four months. Thereafter, it handed over the papers to Shri Subhash Chander Satija, Advocate. However, due to liver ailment, the said counsel fell seriously ill and despite treatment from various doctors, he could not recover. He was referred to MIOT Hospital, Chennai for liver transplant where he remained admitted from 23.5.2013 to 7.8.2013 and ultimately died on 7.8.2013 as per death certificate dated 11.12.2014 (Annexure A-2). Due to this unfortunate incident, the appellant collected the file from the office of S .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... estroying the rights of the parties but to ensure that they do not resort to dilatory tactics and seek remedy without delay. The idea is that every legal remedy must be kept alive for a period fixed by the legislature. To put it differently, the law of limitation prescribes a period within which legal remedy can be availed for redress of the legal injury. At the same time, the courts are bestowed with the power to condone the delay, if sufficient cause is shown for not availing the remedy within the stipulated time. 15. The expression sufficient cause employed in Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 and similar other statutes is elastic enough to enable the courts to apply the law in a meaningful manner which sub serves the end .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . This is the basic test which needs to be applied. The true guide is whether the petitioner has acted with reasonable diligence in the prosecution of his appeal/petition.... 7. From the above, it emerges that the law of limitation has been enacted which is based on public policy so as to prescribe time limit for availing legal remedy for redressal of the injury caused. The purpose behind enacting law of limitation is not to destroy the rights of the parties but to see that the uncertainty should not prevail for unlimited period. Under Section 5 of the 1963 Act, the courts are empowered to condone the delay where a party approaching the court belatedly shows sufficient cause for not availing the remedy within the prescribed period. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as received by the appellant on 14.5.2013 and the appeal was to be filed on or before 14.6.2013. The appellant after receiving the order handed over the complete file to Shri Subhash Chander Satija, Advocate, who at that time was undergoing the treatment of liver transplant at Chennai. He remained admitted there from 23.5.2013 to 7.8.2013 and ultimately died on 7.8.2013. The appellant collected the papers from the office of the said counsel after two months from his death and filed the appeal against the order, Annexure A-1, on 17.10.2013. The appeal was filed late by 120 days. In such circumstances, delay in filing the appeal before the DETC(C) was unintentional and due to the circumstances beyond the control of the appellant. 10. The e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates