Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Agni Steels Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem

2016 (5) TMI 1205 - CESTAT CHENNAI

Eligibility of Cenvat credit - Debit notes raised for claiming reimbursement of rack handling charges, wagon handling charges and port railway usage charges and service tax thereon paid by them - Held that:- by respectfully following the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Indian Farmers Fertilizer Coop Ltd. Vs CCE Ahmedabad [1996 (7) TMI 141 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] and also by relying on the decision of Tribunal in the case of Shree Cement Ltd. Vs CCE Jaipur [2013 (3) TMI 79 - CESTA .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t services. On verification, it was noticed that appellants have availed input service credit on the invoices issued by M/s.Ekdant Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd. & M/s.Enviro Care India Pvt. Ltd. who have provided the services of testing of air dispersion, air pollution stack monitoring and noise survey in and around their factory premises which is mandated by the Pollution Control Board. It was noticed that appellants availed input service credit based on debit notes raised by M/s.KI (Internatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2) of CCR 2004 read with Section 11AC (1) (a) of Central Excise Act, 1944. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the OIO and rejected the appeal. Being aggrieved by the OIA, the appellants are before this Tribunal. 2. Ld. Advocate Shri S. Venkatachalam appearing on behalf of the appellant-company submits that the services of M/s.Ekdant Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd. & M/s.Enviro Care India Pvt. Ltd. were availed to monitor suspended articles in the air and also for non-pollution of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Company Ltd. who is acting as an agent of the appellant company. He drew my attention to the invoice dt. 6.7.2013 of M/s.Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd., (at page 130 of Appeal Paper Book) wherein Railway Receipt No.262005630 dated 3.7.2013 is mentioned and in the Railway Receipt the appellant's name is mentioned and submits that the description of goods mentioned in the said Railway Receipt tallies with invoice issued by M/s.Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. 2.1 As regards pollution control i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Vs CCE Jaipur-2013 (29) STR 77 (Tri.-Del.) (4) Jaquar & Co. Ltd. Vs CST Delhi-2015 (39) STR 273 (Tri-Del.) (5) CCE & Cus., Daman Vs Jalaram Plastic Pack-2014 (34) STR 66 (Tri.-Ahmd.) 3. Shri R. Chandrasekaran, Ld. A.R appearing on behalf of Revenue submits that the issue to be considered in this case is whether certification of Pollution Control Board in the appellant's factory premises is an input service under Rule 2(l) of CCR 2004 for the appellant to claim credit of the service t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

st have nexus with the process of manufacture. He also relied on the Larger Bench decision in the case of Vandana Global Ltd. Vs CCE Raipur - 2010 (253) ELT 440 (Tri.-LB) which has followed the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court. Regarding the credit taken on the services of the CHA, Ld. A.R has referred to page 72 of the appeal paper book where the adjudicating authority has discussed the case of Friends & Friends Shipping Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE & ST Rajkot 2013 (4) ECS (198) (Tri.-Ahmd.). .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the observations as mentioned above, he submits that the appellant is not at all entitled to cenvat credit. On the aspect of limitation, Ld. A.R mentions that it is the responsibility of the assessee that they should have informed to the department regarding the infirmities in their documents/invoices and hence suppression cannot be ruled out and prays that the entire credit should not be allowed and the appeal is liable to be dismissed. 4. In his counter, Ld. Advocate argues that the ld.Commiss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

een disagreed with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramala Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. Vs CCE Meerut 2016-TIOL-20-SC-CEX-LB wherein the LB of the Supreme Court had interpreted the word "include" is used to enlarge the meaning. He further submits that M/s.KI (International) Ltd. has acted as the agent of the appellant. In support of his contention, he relied on the citation of CCE Mysore Vs Chamudi Textiles (Silk Mills) Ltd. - 2011 (270) ELT 531 (Tri-Bang.) 4.1 On limitation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version