Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

R.P. Shah Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane II

Imposition of penalty - Liability of Service tax - Dredging services i.e. desilting of Mithi River - Held that:- by applying the decision of this Bench in the case of Reliance Michigan (JV) v. CCE Thane II [2013 (7) TMI 236 - CESTAT MUMBAI], the appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d 78 of Finance Act, 1994, it is found that the elements of suppression of facts or mis-statement with intent to evade the service tax are absent in this case as the contract of so-called desilting was awarded by the Government of Maharashtra and the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, 1994 as it was during the relevant period, set aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. - Appeal disposed of - Appeal No. ST/197/10 - Final Order No. A/992/2015-WZB/STB - Dated:- 16-4-2015 - MR. M.V. RAVINDRAN, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

10 dated 21.01.2010. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved in this appeal is regarding the service tax liability on the appellant under the category of dredging services. The appellant had undertaken desilting of Mithi Ri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re not made before the Bench. It is his submission that the desilting activity undertaken by the appellant is not in respect of river. He would trace the history back and submit that the so called Mithi River was nothing but a water body and that als .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iance Michigan (JV) (supra) the Bench had set aside the penalty. It is his submission that an appeal has been preferred before the Hon ble Apex Court against the Reliance Michigan (supra) case and the matter is still pending. 5. Learned Departmental .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

em. It is his submission that there is no interference called for on the penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority. 6. We have considered the submissions made at length by both the sides and perused the records. 7.1 At the outset we hold that t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Update Alerts     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version