Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1993 (3) TMI 364

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... his tenure as such Cashier, lakhs of rupees credited in the accounts of the Market Committee were not deposited in its bank account. On leasing of the said misfeasance, the appellant - Market Committee suspended him from service with effect from 22nd March, 1991. He challenged his suspension in the High Court on the ground that some other suspended officers had been allowed to join service. The High Court quashed the suspension order on the said ground. 4. The investigation into the defalcation was, however, in progress. In April, 1991, special auditors were appointed to audit the accounts of the Market Committee. They submitted their -report in May, 1991 in which it was stated that several lakhs of rupees had been embezzled from the fun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he ground that some other suspended officer had been allowed to join duties. That order had nothing to do with the merits of the case. Ordinarily, when there is an accusation of defalcation of the monies, the delinquent employees have to be kept away from the establishment till the charges are finally disposed of. Whether the charges are baseless, malicious or vindictive and are framed only to keep the individual concerned out of the employment is a different matter. But even in such a case, no conclusion can be arrived at without examining the entire record in question-and hence it is always advisable to allow the disciplinary proceedings to continue unhindered.It is possible that in some cases, the authorities do not proceed with the matt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... urt has misconstrued the nature and purpose of the power of suspension vested in the management. It is not disputed that at present all officers concerned are served with the charge-sheets and have been suspended. There is no discrimination between the officers on that account. The charges are also grave and the authorities have come to the conclusion that during the disciplinary proceedings, the officers should not continue in employment to enable them to conduct the proceedings unhindered. Hence, we are satisfied that the order in appeal was not justifed. 6. We, therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the impugned order of the High Court. The effect of this order will be that the order of suspension dated 26th March, ,1992 would stan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... had been alert in his duty as Secretary of the Market Committee, he could, have avoided the embezzlement. Hence, a charge-sheet was served upon the 1st respondent on 10th March, 1992 along with the suspension order of the same date. Against the order, the respondent approached the High Court and the learned Single Judge by his order of 2nd April, 1992 revoked the order of suspension. Against the said order, the appellants preferred an appeal before the Division Bench. By its order dated 8th May, 1992, the Division Bench upheld the revocation of the order of suspension but directed the appellants to complete the inquiry within a period of three months. Since, it was not possible for the appellants to complete the inquiry within three months .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t the employee could not he innocent. Since this is the conclusion arrived at by the management on the basis of the material in their possession, no Conclusions to the contrary could be drawn by the Court at the interlocutory stage and without going through the entire evidence on record In the circumstances, there was no justification for the High Court to revoke the order of suspension. 11. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the order of the High Court revoking the suspension of the 1st respondent is hereby set aside. This will result in revival of the order of suspension dated 10th March, 1992. The appellants should, however, conclude the inquiry expeditiously. 12. There will be no order as to costs. - - TaxTMI - TMITax - .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates