Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Kolte Patil Developers Ltd. Versus DCIT, Central Circle-1 (1) , Pune

2016 (6) TMI 205 - ITAT PUNE

Disallowance u/s 14A - investment in shares/mutual funds/partnership firms, the income of which is tax free - disallowance of indirect expenditure for earning tax free dividend income - Held that:- Since the assessee in the instant case has conclusively proved that it s own capital and free reserves is far more than the investment in shares/mutual funds/partnership firms, the income of which is tax free, therefore, respectfully following the decision of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on this issue. At the same time, there is no suo moto disallowance made by the assessee on account of the expenditure attributable to earning of the exempt income other than the expenditure on account of IPO. Although the assessee has neither disallowed any expenditure on this account in the computation statement presumably on the ground that no expenditure has been incurred and although the AO has also not specifically discussed this issue in the body of the assessment order, however, it canno .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Pathak For The Revenue : Shri Aseem Sharma ORDER PER R.K.PANDA, AM : The above 2 appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the common order dated 31-03-2014 of the CIT(A)-II, Pune relating to Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10 respectively. For the sake of convenience these were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. ITA No.1656/PN/2014 (A.Y.2008-09) : 2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a Limited Company engaged in the business of Developm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t of the revenue with the following directions : (1) The Assessing Officer should cause necessary enquiries as per provisions of Section 14A r/w Rule 8D. (2) The Assessing Officer should verify the contentions of the assessee having regard to the accounts of the assessee. (3) The Assessing Officer should verify both direct as well as indirect expenditure for earning exempt income. (4) Where the expenditure incurred cannot be related to either taxable income or exempted income, the provisions of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ure incurred in relation to such income which does not form part of the total income, in accordance with Rule 8D of Income Tax Rules, 1962. 3. The AO, thereafter, issued notice u/s.143(2) and 142(1) and asked the assessee to justify the correctness of its claim in respect of disallowance u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D. It was submitted by the assessee that as per the audited balance sheet of the company the share capital is ₹ 75,31,00,480/- and the free reserves are to the tune of ₹ 493,28,64, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ay yield exempt income is only ₹ 278.07 crores which is much less than the total figure of share capital and free reserves available with the company. It was accordingly submitted that the assessee has surplus funds available which is much more than the investment made for earning the exempt income and therefore there is no question of making any disallowance of expenditure u/s.14A. 4. The assessee further submitted a chart giving the details of total investments made in various shares/sec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g to IPO were disallowed by the assessee company suo-moto and not a single penny was claimed as allowable business expenditure, therefore, no disallowance u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D is required to be made on account of such investments. 5. The assessee submitted that there are certain investments in the partnership firms where the assessee is a partner. Profit arising from the partnership firm is exempt in the hands of the partner. However, the partnership firm has paid the taxes on the profit generat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n 31-03-2008 is ₹ 84.05 crores which is far less than the investments made by the assessee company. It was reiterated that the assessee has its own surplus free funds far more than the tax free investments made and therefore in absence of any nexus to prove that the borrowed funds are utilized for earning tax free income, there is no question of making any disallowance u/s.14A. It was accordingly argued that under no circumstances any disallowance u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D is called for. Variou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fixed assets 9.86 cr Total 424.05 cr. 7. From the above, it is clear that as against availability of ₹ 424.05 crores for making investments the assessee has made investment of ₹ 507.46 crores which is higher than the interest free funds available for such investment. Thus, it is apparent that the difference of ₹ 83.35 crores has been invested through loan bearing funds. During the year the total loan bearing funds is ₹ 84.05 crores which is utilised for making investment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

said decision is not applicable to the facts of the present case. 9. He also rejected the contention of the assessee that amount of ₹ 424.05 crores was available for making investment which includes ₹ 275.54 crores received from the IPO. Relying on various decisions the AO held that tax free income earned from partnership firm is subject to disallowance u/s.14A. Since the assessee has made investment as capital contribution from loan bearing funds, therefore, provisions of section 14 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

x free and taxable investment in current year and in preceding years also, therefore, the AO applying the provisions of section 14A r.w. Rule 8D (2) and 8D(3) made a disallowance of ₹ 2,70,46,829/-. 10. In appeal, the Ld.CIT(A) upheld the action of the AO for which the assessee is in appeal before us with the following grounds : The following grounds are taken without prejudice to each other - On facts and in law, 1] The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the satisfaction recorded by the learned A.O. was based on wrong presumptions and since the A.O. had not given any cogent reasons as to how the claim of the assessee was incorrect, the disallowance made u/s 14A was not justified at all. 3] Without prejudice to the above grounds, the assessee submits that the investments in shares of various group companies or capital contribution in partnership firms were made on account of business expediency and not with an intention to earn exempt income .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s a nexus between the interest bearing funds raised and making of tax free investments and hence, the proportionate interest attributable to tax free investments was rightly disallowed by the learned A.O. by applying the provisions of section 14A r.w.r. 8D(2)(ii). b. The assessee had not furnished any material to establish that the interest bearing funds were not utilised for making tax free investments and therefore, the disallowance of interest u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D(2)(ii) was justified. 4.2] The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s that whole of the investments in mutual funds were sourced out of owned funds raised through IPO of shares of the assessee company and this fact was also demonstrated by the assessee with proper evidences and hence, the investments made in mutual funds should have been excluded from the amount of tax free investments while computing the disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D(2)(ii). 4.4] Without prejudice to the above grounds, the assessee submits that substantial investments in group companies were m .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

income without appreciating that the learned A.O. has not recorded any objective satisfaction as to how the claim of the assessee is not correct and hence, the disallowance made u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D(2)(iii) is not justified at all. 5.1] The learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the assessee had not claimed indirect expenditure incurred in relation to earning the exempt income in the form of dividend from mutual funds and share of profit in partnership firms and hence, the disallowance of ₹ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

i). 6] Without prejudice to the above grounds, the assessee submits that the disallowance u/s 14A is attracted only in cases where the assessee has earned exempt income and hence, if at all, any disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D is to be made in the case of the assessee, the investments on which no exempt income has been earned should have been excluded while computing the disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D. 7] Without prejudice to the above grounds, the assessee submits that the investment made in par .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e to add, alter, amend or delete any of the above grounds of appeal. 11. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee referring to page 46 of the paper book drew the attention of the Bench to the chart showing tax free investments held as on 31-03-2008 and submitted that the total investments can be categorised into 3 parts : a. Investment in subsidiary/associate Companies - Rs.117,85,71,206/- b. Investment in mutual funds - Rs.160,28,12,406/- c. Investment in partnership firms - Rs.56,66,04,935/- Rs.334,79 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

funds and the investment in shares/debentures/mutual funds/investment in partnership firms, the income of which is tax free, the AO and the CIT(A) have not considered the same properly. He submitted that it was conclusively proved before the AO and CIT(A) that the assessee has raised funds from public issue which was kept in separate bank account maintained with HSBC and the said funds were temporarily utilised for investment in mutual funds which was redeemed as and when funds were required. Ho .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ferring to page 24 of the paper book the Ld. Counsel for the assessee drew the attention of the Bench to the balance sheet of the assessee company and submitted that the share capital has been shown at ₹ 75,31,00,480/- and reserves and surplus at ₹ 493,26,64,916/-. However, the AO in the body of the assessment order has reduced the net current assets shown at ₹ 134.6 crores and net fixed assets at ₹ 9.86 crores and has determined the own capital and free reserves of the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the total investment in shares of subsidiary/associate companies, investment in mutual funds and investment in partnership forms are only to the tune of ₹ 334,79,88,547/-. However, the AO while computing the investment of ₹ 507.4 crores has included the investment in debentures etc. whose income is taxable. Since the own capital and free reserves of the assessee company at ₹ 568.58 crores is much more than the tax free investments of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l funds are out of the proceeds of the IPO and there is no question of any diversion of interest bearing funds. Therefore, no disallowance on this amount is called for. So far as the investment in subsidiary/associate companies amounting to ₹ 117.86 crores is concerned he submitted that no dividend has been received from these companies. Referring to the decision of the Pune Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Goyal Ishwarchand Kishorilal vide ITA No.422/PN/2013 order dated 26-06-2014 he .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r as the indirect expenses are concerned the Ld. Counsel for the assessee referring to the computation statement submitted that the assessee has already disallowed the public issue expenditure on account of the IPO in the computation statement. Therefore, no disallowance is called for. Further, no satisfaction has been recorded by the AO on account of incurring of indirect expenses for earning tax free dividend income. Referring to the decision of the Pune Bench of the Tribunal in the case of AC .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

17. The Ld. Departmental Representative on the other hand heavily relied on the order of the AO and the CIT(A). He submitted that the assessee has earned huge exempt income and no disallowance has been made u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D. He submitted that if the contention of the assessee that it has surplus funds for investment in shares/mutual funds/partnership firms is accepted, then there was no need to borrow funds. Referring to para 4.3 of the order of the CIT(A) at page 34 he submitted that the L .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t is a fit case where provisions of section 14A are applicable and applying Rule 8D(2) he has calculated the disallowance u/s.14A. He accordingly submitted that the order of the CIT(A) be upheld. 19. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee in his rejoinder referring to the decision of the Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Bombay Samachar Ltd. reported in 74 ITD 723 submitted that the Hon ble High Court in the said decision has held that the fact that the assessee had ample reserves at hi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

wed funds have been utilised for investment in tax free investments, he submitted that the assessee has clearly demonstrated before the lower authorities that it has not utilised the borrowed funds for tax free investments. Therefore, the onus has shifted to the revenue authorities. Since they have not discharged the onus the assessee cannot be blamed for this. 21. As regards the recording of satisfaction is concerned he submitted that the AO in page 8 of the assessment order has recorded satisf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

called for. It has been held in the said decision that the AO must furnish to the assessee a reasonable opportunity to show cause on the correctness of the claim made by him. In the event that the AO is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim made by the assessee he must record reasons for his conclusion. There has to be specific objective satisfaction recorded by the AO which is one of the mandates of section 14(2). In absence of the same recourse to Rule 8D of the Rules is not permiss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and CIT(A) and the paper book filed on behalf of the assessee. We have also considered the various decisions cited before us. We find the Ld.CIT in the instant case has directed the AO to cause necessary enquiries as per the provisions of section 14A r.w. Rule 8D and determine the disallowance in accordance with provision to sub-section (2) and (3) of Rule 8D. We find the AO in the assessment order made disallowance of ₹ 2,20,46 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re kept in a separate bank account maintained with HSBC and were utilized for making investment in mutual funds. It is also the submission of the Ld. Counsel of the assessee that no dividend income has been received by the assessee from investment in shares of various group companies for which no disallowance can be made on account of investment in shares. It is also the argument of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that the income of the partnership firm has already suffered tax in the hands of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e details of investment and a copy of which is placed at page 28 of the paper book, we find the total investment of ₹ 507.46 crores includes investment in debentures and NSC the income of which is not tax free. Therefore, the AO is not justified in including the same in the category of investment, the income of which is tax free. From page 46 of the paper book we find the total investment in subsidiary/associate companies, investment in mutual funds and the investment in partnership firms, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ances we have to see the applicability of provisions of section 14A r.w.r.8D. 25. We find merit in the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that when no dividend is received on investment in shares worth ₹ 117,85,71,206/- in subsidiary/associate companies no disallowance u/s.14A is called for. We find the Pune Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Goyal Ishwarchand Kishorilal (Supra) has held that when assessee has not received any dividend out of the shares held as investment, th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

we find the assessee before the AO has made the following submission which has been reproduced by the AO at page 4 and 5 of the assessment order and which reads as under : 6. Secondly, the assessee is enclosing herewith the chart giving the details of the total investments made in various shares/securities/mutual funds. Now, it may kindly be noted that the assessee company had made a public issue of its shares in F.Y.2007-08 and had receive d ₹ 275.54 crores as IPO funds. These IPO funds w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

entire investments in the mutual funds were out of the IPO funds. It is also to be noted that all the expenses incurred pertaining to the IPO were disallowed by the assessee company and not a single penny was claimed as allowable business expenditure. The computation of income for A.Y.2008-09 is enclosed herewith and from which it is clear that the expenditure incurred for the IPO has been disallowed while computing the income. 27. Nothing has been brought on record by the revenue that the abov .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

377; 116.28 crores in mutual funds. 28. As regards the submission of the Ld. Departmental Representative that if the assessee had sufficient interest free funds, then there was no need to borrow is concerned we do not find any merit in the same. It is for the assessee to arrange its affairs and the revenue cannot direct the assessee to do its business in a particular manner. The Revenue has to see whether money borrowed has been utilized for the purpose of business or not. We find a somewhat sim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o the sister concerns which inturn would earn income from interest there on while no interest accrued to the assessee on the large balances with it. He therefore disallowed a part of the interest expenditure. According to the AO since the amount of interest which the assessee would have got if he had charged interest on these amounts, far exceeded the amount of interest paid by it to outsiders in this year, therefore he disallowed the entire amount of interest claimed by the assessee as a deduct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Income tax Officer that if the assessee had collected the outstandings which were due to it from others, it would have been able to reduce its indebtedness and thus save a part of the interest which it had to pay on its own borrowings. The assessee, therefore, was not justified in allowing its outstandings to remain without charging any interest thereon while it was paying interest on the amounts borrowed by it. To the extent, therefore, to which it would have been in a position to collec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

been borrowed by the assessee ; secondly, it must have been borrowed for the purpose of business and, thirdly, the assessee must have paid interest on the said amount and claimed it as a deduction. It is not the requirement of the provision that the assessee must further show that the borrowing of the capital was necessary for the business so that if at the time of borrowing the assessee had sufficient amount of its own, the deduction could not be allowed. Similarly, the Madras High Court in Am .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee had sufficient interest free funds, there was no need to borrow from financial institutions. 29. As regards the argument of the Ld. Departmental Representative that assessee was not able to demonstrate that no borrowed funds have been utilized by the assessee towards the investment in shares/mutual funds/partnership firms, the income of which is tax free is concerned, we find the assessee before the AO had demonstrated that no borrowed funds have been utilized for investment in tax free inves .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee the AO has reduced the net fixed assets and net current assets from such free reserves and own capital which in our opinion is not justified in the light of various decisions including the decision of Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of Reliance Utilities and Power Ltd. (Supra) and HDFC Bank Ltd. (Supra). 30. We find the Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of HDFC Bank Ltd. (Supra) at para 15 and 16 of the order has held as under : 15. It is clear that for the first time in the case of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a) for the first time on 23rd July, 2014 has settled the issue by holding that the test of presumption as held by this Court in Reliance Utilities and Power Ltd. (Supra) while considering Section 36(1)(iii) of the Act would apply while considering the application of Section 14A of the Act. The aforesaid decision of this Court in HDFC Bank Ltd. (Supra) on the above issue has also been accepted by the Revenue inasmuch as even though they have filed an appeal to the Supreme Court against that order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e is no conflict as sought to be made out by the impugned order. Thus, impugned order has proceeded on a fundamentally erroneous basis as the ratio decindi of the order in Godrej and Boyce manufacturing Co. Ltd. (Supra) had nothing to do with the rest of presumption canvassed by the petitioner before the Tribunal on the basis of the ratio of the decision of this Court in HDFC Bank Ltd. (Supra). 16. At the hearing Mr. Suresh Kumar, Learned Counsel for the Revenue urged that on the facts of this c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sing Officer passed the Assessment order on 22nd December, 2010 under section 143(3) of the Act. The CIT(A) passed an order on 21st November, 2011 dismissing the petitioner s appeal. On both the dates, when the orders were passed by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A), the authorities did not have the benefit of the order of this Court in HDFC Bank Ltd. (Supra) rendered on 23rd July, 2014. Once the issue is settled by the decision of this Court in HDFC Bank Ltd. (Supra), there is now no need for th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e instant case has conclusively proved that it s own capital and free reserves is far more than the investment in shares/mutual funds/partnership firms, the income of which is tax free, therefore, respectfully following the decision of the Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of HDFC Bank Ltd.(Supra) we hold that no disallowance u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D(2) is called for on account of disallowance of interest. 32. So far as the disallowance of indirect expenditure for earning tax free dividend incom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

enditure on this account in the computation statement presumably on the ground that no expenditure has been incurred and although the AO has also not specifically discussed this issue in the body of the assessment order, however, it cannot be said that no expenditure has been incurred by the assessee for earning the tax free income. Considering the totality of the facts of the case, we are of the considered opinion that disallowance of ₹ 10 lakhs on adhoc basis on account of expenditure at .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

xpenditure for earning exempt income and hence, the same was not allowable as a deduction while computing the business income for this year. 2] The learned CIT(A) erred in holding that the learned A.O. had made the disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D after recording his satisfaction that the claim of the assessee was not correct and therefore, the disallowance was justified. 2.1] The learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the satisfaction recorded by the learned A.O. was based on wrong presumptions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion to such investments. 4] The learned CIT(A) erred in holding that the assessee had utilized interest bearing borrowed funds for making tax free investments and thereby confirming the disallowance of ₹ 1,62,11,508/- made on account of proportionate interest expenditure computed as per the provisions of rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. 4.1] The learned CIT(A) erred in holding that - a. There was a nexus between the interest bearing funds raised and making of tax free investm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee were far more than the amount of tax free investments and since there was no nexus between the interest bearing loans and making of tax free investments, there was no reason to hold that the assessee had utilized borrowed funds for making tax free investments and thus, the disallowance of interest to the extent of ₹ 1,62,11,508/- was not justified. 4.3] Without prejudice to the above grounds, the assessee submits that whole of the investments in mutual funds were sourced out of owned fu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y the assessee and therefore, such investments made out of owned funds should have been excluded from the amount of tax free investments while computing the disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D(2)(ii). 5] The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of ₹ 1,01,21,875/- made by the learned A.O. u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D(2)(iii) on the ground that the assessee had incurred indirect expenditure in relation to earning exempt income without appreciating that the learned A.O. has not recorded any ob .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rejudice to the above grounds, the assessee submits that the whole of the investments in mutual funds were sourced out of funds raised through IPO of shares of the assessee company and no expenses in respect of the IPO issue have been claimed by the assessee and therefore, the investments in mutual funds should have been excluded from the amount of tax free investments while computing the disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D(2)(iii). 6] Without prejudice to the above grounds, the assessee submits that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version