Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (6) TMI 275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... I and disclosed the entire fact including the status of their case which is pending at show cause notice stage. Secondly, appellant even though, there is no confirmed demand, in view of show cause notice, executed indemnity bond wherein they have undertaken to discharge the Central Excise duty liability as and when it arises in future. Therefore it is of the view, after making substantial compliance of the provision there is no reason to deny the de-registration of the appellant. Even, if it is assumed that appellants registration should not be cancelled, in such case new registration to any other person on the same premises cannot be given and if that be so then no operation can be carried out in the said premises. Thus Adjudicating au .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... -I commissionarate. The appellant submitted an undertaking on stamp paper of ₹ 100/- with the Superintendent Central Excise Range-IV, Division Kalyan-IV, Commissionarate Thane I, undertaking to pay to the Asstt. Commissioner of Central Excise, Division Kalyan-IV, Commissionarate Thane I, any dues-arising out of the proceedings initiated vide show cause notice No. No. V/Adj/15-85-/PI/KII/MII/2002 dated 3/5/2002 against them as and when the matter is decided by the appropriate authority. They declared in the Annexure III that the duty has been paid in respect of all excisable goods manufactured and remaining in the factory, which are liable for duty and there is no Government dues pending against them as on that date and requested that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Commissioner(Appeals) who set aside the order-in-original and allowed the appeal of the Revenue. Being aggrieved by the impugned order, appellant is before me. 3. Ms. Anisha Mandani, Ld Counsel for the appellant submits that appellant have complied with the procedure prescribed for surrendering of Central Excise Registration. The appellant stopped their manufacturing activity in 2003 itself therefore as per Notification No. 35/2001-CE(NT) dated 26/6/2001 as per clause 6 every registered person who ceased to carry the operation for which he is registered shall de-register himself by making a declaration in form specified in Annexure III and depositing his registration certificate with the Superintendent of Central Excise. The fact tha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... essors Vs. Additional Commissioner of C. Ex.[2005(184) ELT 13(Bom.)], according to which appellants surrender of registration cannot be accepted and Commissioner of Central Excise, Shillong Vs. Dharmapal Satyapal Ltd[2005(186) ELT 235(Tri. Kolkata)], according to which the registration can be surrendered only after all dues for registered premises have been discharged. 5. I have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides and perused record. 6. The issue to be decided by me in the circumstances that show cause notice is pending against appellant, whether surrender of Central Excise Registration, proposed by the appellant can be accepted by the department or otherwise. The fact is not under dispute that there is no confirm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ll continue or he shall not be de-registered but only requirement is to file declaration in Annexure III form. In the present case new registration has been granted in terms of Tribunal Order in case of M/s. Monomer Chemical Industries Pvt Ltd(supra). Even as per ruling of the Hon ble Bombay High Court in case of Manibhadra Processors(supra) one premises cannot be registered in name of two different persons. The Hon ble High Court also held that person holding earlier registration certificate must surrender registration certificate in respect of that premises then only new person can get registration in respect of that premises. The Honble High court held that compliance of provision of Notification 35/2001-CE(NT) necessary to prevent anyb .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates