TMI Blog1989 (2) TMI 406X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... #39;the Act'), the question referred for our opinion is as under: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law in holding that the assessee is entitled for deduction under section 35(1)(iv) of the amount of ₹ 2,83,310 spent on the purchase of buses? The facts which are necessary for the purpose of answering the question, are a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o transport the research personnel and was not related to the business of the assessee other than scientific research. The ITO was of the view that this was a conveyance which the assessee was required to provide in respect of its employees and it was the normal transportation expenses, and the mere fact that scientific research personnel were carried in those buses did not convert the transport e ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ven in section 43(4)(i) of the Act as also the Explanation given under section 43(4)(ii), which read as under: 4. 'Scientific research' means any activities for the extension of knowledge in the fields of natural or applied science including agriculture, animal husbandry or fisheries,- (i)****** (ii)references to expenditure incurred on scientific research include all expenditure ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... yance to the scientific personnel to travel from their respective residences to the factory, cannot be regarded as a facility for the prosecution of scientific research. Sri Sarangan, the learned counsel for the assessee, however, submitted that the language used in the explanation was very wide and every capital expenditure incurred which facilitates the prosecution of scientific research, falls ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
