Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Videocon Industries Ltd. Another Versus State of Maharshtra & Others

2016 (6) TMI 341 - SUPREME COURT

Offence punishable under Section 56(1)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 for the alleged contravention of the provisions of Sections 18(2) and 18(3) of the Act - Held that:- The tribunal has arrived at a conclusion that the appellant cannot be held guilty for Section 18(2) read with Section 18(3) of FER Act, 1973 and the advise of the Reserve Bank of India given in its letters dated 21.1.1992 and 18.2.1994 deserve to be accepted as they are totally in consonance with legal provisio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

efore, the prosecution is liable to continue. As we perceive, the judgment of the tribunal is on merits, inasmuch as findings have been recorded after analysis of facts and the conclusion has been arrived at that the appellants have not violated the provisions of the Act. In such a situation, it cannot be said that it is a judgment rendered on technical grounds and, therefore, we are compelled to hold that the High Court has totally erred in law. - Thus we allow the appeals, set aside the ju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. S. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Mohan, Adv. Ms. Garima Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Nirnimesh Dube,Adv. SLP(Crl.) 40/14 Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Mohan, Adv. Ms. Garima Tiwari, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. A.K. Panda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Adv. Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Rajat Mathuria, Adv. Ms. Sonali Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J. Leave granted. 2. The present appeals, by s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ffence punishable under Section 56(1)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (for short, 'the Act') for the alleged contravention of the provisions of Sections 18(2) and 18(3) of the Act. 3. As the factual matrix would depict, when the matter was pending for trial before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the adjudicating authority vide order dated 30.03.2005 imposed penalty of ₹ 2,00,00,000/- (Rupees two crore only) against the appellant-company and penalty amount .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

partment, discussed the stand put forth by the assessees and came to hold that:- Thus, it is simple and clear from the language that goods which were purchased from Korea and Japan are not covered under Section 18(1)(a). From this sequence, it further flows that Section 18(2) is not applicable to the goods which were sold in international market by way of international transactions because these provisions are made applicable to the goods which are otherwise covered under Section 18(1)(a) and no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Shri A.C. Singh, ALA could not point out any other provision in FER Act where spending of foreign exchange is prohibited in international trade by a person resident in India. It is well known fact that international trade is transacted by spending foreign exchange but the earning of foreign exchange is also made by person resident in India. There is no law whereby Indian resident is regulated from entering into international trade. If that is so, the appellant cannot be held guilty for Section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n be held guilty by the impugned order. It is apparent from the impugned order that partner appellants as well as Director appellants are held guilty doubly and separately even when these names are over-lapping and all of them are also shown as directors of M/s. Videocon Appliances Ltd. 12. The Reverse Bank of India by two letters of dated 21.1.1992 and dated 18.2.1994 as at page 46 and 52 of the records has also stated that international transactions of trade by purchase of goods from Japan and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

two letters is required to be accepted when it is totally in consonance with the legal provisions. [Underlining is ours] 5. Being of this view, the tribunal dislodged the finding of the adjudicating authority. 6. Be it noted here, the order passed by the tribunal was not assailed by the Revenue and, therefore, it has attained finality. 7. Presently, we shall advert to the scenario in the court of the learned Magistrate. During the process of adjudication and the delineation of the assail by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ision Application No. 716 of 2008 and the learned Additional Sessions Judge dislodged the view expressed by the learned Magistrate and allowed the revision. Being dissatisfied, the appellant preferred Criminal Application No. 497 of 2011 before the High Court. The learned single Judge referred to the decision Radheshyam Kejriwal v. State of West Bengal & Anr. (2011) 3 SCC 581, noted that the revisional court had relied on the minority view, reflected on the principles culled out in the said .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sion was obtained by the accused to ship the goods from South Korea and Japan directly. Foreign exchange was paid to the Japanese and Korean companies. The payment was to be received in Indian rupees and same was supposed to be received in India at Indian Bank, Nariman Point Branch, Mumbai. This being nature of transaction, it follows that the export of goods was deemed export from India and foreign exchange was spent for buying the goods from South Korea and Japan. The payment was to be receive .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

said appreciation has led to the dismissal of the criminal application preferred by the assessee. 10. We have heard Mr. C.U. Singh, learned senior counsel for the appellant and Mr. A.K. Panda, learned senior counsel for the respondents. 11. It is submitted by Mr. Singh that the High Court has not appropriately decided the petition regard being had to the jurisdiction under the Code of Criminal Procedure and keeping in view the principles stated by the majority in Radheshyam Kejriwal (supra) but .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

have been interfered with by the revisional court and the High Court should not have given the stamp of affirmance to the order passed in revision. 12. Mr. Panda, learned senior counsel, per contra, would go to the extent of submitting that the decision in Radheshyam Kejriwal (supra) is not in accordance with the principles stated in Standard Chartered Bank and others v. Directorate of Enforcement and Others (2006) 4 SCC 278 and therefore it requires reconsideration. He has referred to various .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uld exercise its jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution and set aside the order of the High Court. That apart, it is urged that there is no necessity for reconsideration of the decision in Radheshyam Kejriwal (supra) by a larger Bench. 14. It is obligatory to note at the outset that the findings recorded and the conclusions arrived at by the tribunal are founded on analysis of statutory provisions, the applicability of the letters issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the nature of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The High Court has noted the same and has not really adverted to the said facet. At this juncture it is necessary to state that the revisional court should have followed the view expressed by the majority and not the minority. The approach is absolutely erroneous. Be that as it may, as the order passed by the High Court would show, it has referred to the principles culled out in Radheshyam Kejriwal (supra) and thereafter had proceeded, as has been indicated earlier, to record its opinion about t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

unal. It is interesting to note that the High Court has relied on the principles of the majority in Radheshyam Kejriwal (supra) and declined to quash the proceedings. Mr. Panda, learned senior counsel appearing for the revenue would strenuously argue that the Radheshyam Kejriwal (supra) is contrary to the view expressed in the Standard Chartered Bank (supra) and, therefore, the matter requires to be reconsidered by the larger Bench. As we find, that the decision in Standard Chartered Bank (supra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that a finding in an adjudication is binding on the court in a prosecution under Section 56 of the Act. There is no indication that the prosecution depends upon the result of the adjudication. We have already held that on the scheme of the Act, the two proceedings are independent. The finding in one is not conclusive in the other. In the context of the objects sought to be achieved by the Act, the elements relied on by the learned Senior Counsel, would not justify a finding that a prosecution ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion would arise as to whether continuance of the prosecution would be permissible or not. In other words, the question with which we are concerned is the impact of the findings which are recorded on the culmination of adjudication proceedings on criminal proceeding and in case in the adjudication proceedings the person concerned is exonerated can he ask for dropping of the criminal proceeding on that ground alone . 17. Thereafter, it has referred to various authorities, namely, Collector of Cus .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lding that adjudication proceedings and criminal proceeding are two in- dependent proceedings and both can go on simultaneously and finding in the adjudication proceedings is not binding on the criminal proceeding and the judgments of this Court in Uttam Chand, G.L. Didwania and K.C. Builders wherein this Court had taken a view that when there is categorical finding in the adjudication proceedings exonerating the person which is binding and conclusive, the prosecution cannot be allowed to stand. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as follows: (i) Adjudication proceedings and criminal prosecution can be launched simultaneously; (ii) Decision in adjudication proceedings is not necessary before initiating criminal prosecution; (iii) Adjudication proceedings and criminal proceedings are independent in nature to each other; (iv) The finding against the person facing prosecution in the adjudication proceedings is not binding on the proceeding for criminal prosecution; (v) Adjudication proceedings by the Enforcement Directorate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

found to be not sustainable at all and the person held innocent, criminal prosecution on the same set of facts and circumstances cannot be allowed to continue, the underlying principle being the higher standard of proof in criminal cases . 19. Clarifying the position, the majority observed that the yardstick would be to judge as to whether the allegation in the adjudication proceedings as well as the proceeding for prosecution is identical and the exoneration of the person concerned in the adju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

here is no contravention of any of the provisions of the Act, it would be unjust and an abuse of the process of the court to permit the Enforcement Directorate to continue with the criminal prosecution. 20. We respectfully concur with the said view and do not perceive any reason to disagree with the same and refer the pronouncement in Radheshyam Kejriwal (supra) for reconsideration by the larger Bench. 21. Coming to the facts of the case, we find that the tribunal has arrived at a conclusion tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version