2009 (2) TMI 842

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... te For the Respondent : Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate M.M. KUMAR, J. This appeal has been filed at the instance of revenue under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for brevity, 'the Act') against the order dated 6.8.2007, passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for brevity, 'the Tribunal') upholding the order dated 30.6.2005, passed by the Commiss .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dings that the inputs have been used in the final product and there was no evidence to show that any other method of supplying the inputs except the supply made by the dealer. Accordingly no question of law would arise for adjudication much less a substantive question of law within the meaning of Section 35 G of the Act. The appeal does not warrant admission and consequently dismissed.
Case la .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X