Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shaik Mohammad Ali Versus The Commissioner of Customs & Others

2015 (8) TMI 1295 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

Seizure of gold - the Petitioner/Power of Attorney of the Principal approached the officer of Customs in Airport for the execution of the order showing his willingness to pay the fine and penalty. However, the said order was not executed. Being aggrieved by the inaction, though a letter was given to the Commissioner of Customs (Airport), Chennai dated 15.07.2015, there is no response. Hence, the Petitioner is before this Court.

Admittedly, as against the orders passed by the Appellate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.P.Nos. 1 to 3 of 2015 - Dated:- 31-8-2015 - MR. R.MAHADEVAN J. For the Petitioners: Mr. T. Chezhiyan For the Respondents: Mr. V. Sundareswaran COMMON ORDER By consent of the learned counsel on either side, these Writ Petitions are taken up for final disposal. 2. The facts, leading to filing of these Writ Petitions, are as follows:- a. The Principal of the Petitioner in WP.No.22438 of 2015, who is an eligible passenger, brought gold and the same was seized, followed by a show cause notice as to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Customs (Appeals), Chennai, who upon hearing has passed orders in terms of reduction in the quantum of fine and penalty vide C4-I/314/0/2015-Air, dated 24.06.2015. Thereafter, the Petitioner/Power of Attorney of the Principal approached the officer of Customs in Airport for the execution of the order showing his willingness to pay the fine and penalty. However, the said order was not executed. Being aggrieved by the inaction, though a letter was given to the Commissioner of Customs (Airport), .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

epartment to the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Chennai, who upon hearing, dismissed the appeal filed by the Department and passed orders in the Petitioner's appeal, in terms of reduction in the quantum of fine and penalty vide C4-I/349 and 350/0/2015-Air dated 29.06.2015. Thereafter, the Petitioner approached the officer of customs in airport for execution of the order showing his willingness to pay the fine and penalty. However, the said order was not executed. Being aggrieved by the i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version