Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

TRANSPEK INDUSTRY LIMITED Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2016 (6) TMI 742 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Reopening of assessment - period of limitation - Held that:- . In view of the provisions of Section 150 (1) and 150 (2), on the basis of which order came to be passed on 5.11.2008, limitation was over on 31.3.2008, therefore, Special Civil Application is required to be allowed in favour of assessee - SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13999 of 2010 With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14009 of 2010 - Dated:- 9-6-2016 - MR. KS JHAVERI AND MR. G.R.UDHWANI, JJ. FOR THE PETITIONER : MR SN SOPARKAR, Sr.Advo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e issued calling for explanations/details on several issues. The petitioner submitted such details and authorized representative of the petitioner attended the assessment proceedings, thereafter, assessment order was framed. Against such orders, the petitioner preferred appeals before CIT (A), which were partly allowed. Thereafter, the respondent issued impugned notice under Section 148 of the Act, reopening the assessment for both the Assessment Years. In response to the notices impugned, the p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submitted that no notice under Section 148 can be issued for reopening beyond six years from the end of the relevant assessment year and the only exception to this provision is contained in sub-section (2) of Section 150 of the Act. He further submitted that even this provision do not authorize the respondent to issue the notice for more than one reason. He submitted that for the Assessment Year 2001-2002, order was passed on 12.3.2004 whereby .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

account of Tarak Chemicals Ltd. A notice u/s 133 (6) was issued to Tarak Chemicals Ltd. for furnishing the agreement along with details of valuation of knowhow in respect of fee received from the assessee. No response was received from the Tarak Chemicals P. Ltd. The Assessing Officer observed that no agreement has been executed between the assessee and Tarak Chemicals P. Ltd. and concluded that this is a colourable device to reduce the profit of the assessee company. Accordingly claim of deprec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appellant has claimed depreciation on technical knowhow supposed to have been supplied by Tarak Chemicals. No information about the technical knowhow, how valuation was done, agreement with the supplier or competence of the supplier was submitted. Even Tarak Chemicals did not respond to the Assessing Officer's query. Tarak Chemicals was found to be associated enterprise. During appellate proceedings also a specific query has been raised as to the details of assets created on account of techn .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee with the Assessing Officer that appellant has used this claim as a colourable devise to reduce its income. The purchase during the year may be ₹ 28.87 lacs but the appellant claimed depreciation to the extent of ₹ 46,91,710/- and therefore the Assessing Officer is justified in disallowing the claim of depreciation on nonexistent assets. While confirming the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer, he is directed to disallow the claim of depreciation in all other years since the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion/allowance for the said assessment year and I hereby require you to deliver to me within 30 days from the date of service of this notice, a return in the prescribed form of your income in respect of which you are assessable for the said assessment years. 5. He submitted that the period of limitation was over on 31.3.2008 while notice is given on 12.10.2009, therefore, Section 150 (2) will not come into operation. In this regard, he has relied upon the decision of the Apex Court in the case of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs of the law of limitation, under the exclusionary provisions of Sections 150(1) and 153(3)(ii) of the Act, stated: "In this regard, it is important to note that these notices were issued to give effect to the directions contained in the revision order u/s 263 passed by the CIT on 12.7.2004 unlike Section 149 of the Act, there is no time limit u/s 150(1) that starts with non obstante clause and to that extent the observations of the Hon'ble High court are in error. Further Section 150( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

any time for the purpose of making an assessment or reassessment or recomputation in consequence of or to give effect to any finding or direction contained in an order passed by any authority in any proceeding under this Act by way of appeal, reference or revision or by a Court in any proceeding under any other law. (2) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply in any case where any such assessment, reassessment or recomputation as is referred to in that sub-section relates to an assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s in terms of Sections 147 and 148 of the Act can be initiated at any point of time whatsoever. Such a proceeding can be initiated only within the period of limitation prescribed therefor as contained in Section 149 of the Act. Section 150 (1) of the Act is an exception to the aforementioned provision. It brings within its ambit only such cases where reopening of the proceedings may be necessary to comply with an order of the higher authority. For the said purpose, the records of the proceedings .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Parikh has also taken us through the notice dated 19.7.2010, reply to the notice and decision of the authority rejecting the contention of the assessee. He submitted that while passing the order dated 15.9.2010, it is observed in para 4 as under:- 4. The submission of the assessee which runs in 6 pages is too broad and general in nature in the facts of the case. The submission of the assessee has been duly considered but the same is not tenable in law, and therefore, not acceptable. On the basis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version