Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Robust Hotels Pvt Ltd. Versus The Additional Commissioner Office of the Commissioner of Central Excise

Levy of excise duty - manufacture - whether food cooked and served in Hotels and Restaurants are excisable - SSI exemption - whether the value of the food sold in Restaurants should be taken into account to compute the aggregate value of clearances so as to decide the eligibility of availing the exemption provided under the Notification 8/2003-CE, dated 01.03.2003 - Maintainability of writ petition - alternative appellate remedy. - Held that:- it is seen that the case of the petitioner itsel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case, which arose under the Income Tax Act. - As rightly pointed out by the learned Senior Standing counsel appearing for the respondent what the petitioner seeks to agitate is a disputed question of fact and such disputed questions would not be normally adjudicated in a Writ Petition, more particularly, when it involves a taxation statue. Therefore, the petitioner has not made out any grounds to entertain a Writ Petition as against the impugned order. - Writ petition dismissed - Decided .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndustry and registered under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act and the Finance Act on the file of the respondent, has filed this Writ Petition, challenging the order in Original Nos.2&3 of 2015, dated 30.01.2015. By the impugned order, the respondent confirmed the demand of ₹ 5,36,733/- being the duty payable by the petitioner during the period 01.04.2012 to 30.11.2012, under Section 11A(10) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, (Act), apart from ordering recovery of inte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dy of filing an appeal before the CESTAT as against the impugned order, pointing out that the said remedy is not only effective, but efficacious. The learned counsel of the petitioner submitted that in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian Hotels Co., Ltd., & Ors., vs. Income Tax Officer, Mumbai & Ors., reported in (2000) 7 SCC 39, the petitioner is entitled to challenge the impugned order by way of a Writ Petition. Therefore, the learned counse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

duty and filed monthly returns claiming that their aggregate value of clearances has not crossed the threshold limit as provided under Notification 8 of 2003, CE, dated 01.03.2003, as amended. The Department, on scrutiny, found that edible food preparation manufactured and removed by the petitioner is exempted from payment of duty vide Notification No.12, 2012-CE, dated 17.03.2012, but the petitioner has not paid duty on items like cakes, pastries, ice creams etc., claiming benefit under the SS .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng period from April 2012 to November 2012, was issued and another show cause notice dated 08.01.2014, covering period from December 2012 to September 2013 was issued. The petitioner submitted their reply vide letters dated 21.06.2013, and 28.01.2014, contending that benefit of exemption is available to cooked food, as it is not covered under the definition of 'manufacture' as provided under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1985, and hence, not excisable. Further, it was contended .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be a process amounting to manufacture, as it is necessary that a new distinct commercial product must come into existence after undergoing the manufacturing process. However, after cooking pulses, rice etc., they continue to remain as pulses, rice etc and no distinct commodity emerges after cooking. After affording an opportunity of personal hearing, the Commissioner framed two issues for consideration, namely:- (i) whether the food cooked and served in Hotels and Restaurants are excisable; and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion raised by the petitioner stating that after cooking no distinct product emerges and held that such a plea was fallacious. Further, after taking note of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in UOI vs. Delhi Cloth and General Mills, reported in (1997) 4 SCC 303 held that after cooking, a new and different product emerges and therefore, it is manufacture. Ultimately, the proposals made in the show cause notice was confirmed and the impugned order came to be passed. The submission of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vour to state that what is done by the petitioner is not manufacture and processing of food to make it edible would not fall within the definition of manufacture as defined under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. 7. The learned Senior Standing counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that all issues raised by the petitioner have been threadbare considered by the respondent and if the petitioner is aggrieved, he has to approach the CESTAT by way of an appeal and the issues raised by t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and the matter pertains only to the flight kitchen operated by the appellant Hotel. Therefore, the Hon'ble Supreme Court did not deal with the other contentions. In the said case, CIT (Appeals) accepted the contention of the assessee that Taj Flight Kitchen cannot be considered as a hotel, as it is a separate industrial undertaking, which is engaged in production of food packages on a large, organised and mechanised basis for the use of various International Airlines. It was held that the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ght kitchen. Though two other cases were also dealt with in the said judgment, at present, I am not referring to the same, as they are not germane to the facts of the instant case. After referring to Sections 80-J(1) proviso, 80-J(4), 80-J(6) and Section 32A of the Income Tax Act, the Hon'ble Supreme Court pointed out that for getting benefit of deduction or investment allowance, the requirement is that the assessee company must be engaged in the business of manufacture or production of any .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

with grant of investment rebate or deduction under section 80J it is apparent that it is used to mean production of a new article or bringing into existence some new commodity by an industrial undertaking. It would not be applicable in cases where only processing activity is carried out. 9. Thus, the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court pertained to the question as to whether an assessee would be entitled to the benefit of deduction or investment allowance and what are the para meters. It w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s any process,- (i) incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product; (ii)which is specified in relation to any goods in the Section or Chapter notes of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) as amounting to manufacture; or (iii) which, in relation to the goods specified in the third schedule, involves packing or repacking of such goods in a unit container or labeling or relabeling of containers including the declaration or alteration of retail s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version