Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Ms. Farrah Marker C/o. D.C. Bothra & Co. Versus Income Tax Officer

Addition u/s 68 - AO presumed that the purchases of the ‘said shares’ of M/s. Shukun Constructions Ltd. were not made on the date as disclosed by the assessee, but was backdated and an arranged transaction - LTCG income shown as exempt under section 10(38) - Held that:- The authorities below, i.e. AO/CIT(A) have made the addition under section 68 of the Act merely on presumptions, suspicions and surmises in respect of penny stocks; disregarding the direct evidences placed on record and furnished .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ghvi on 31.12.2007, the day the order of assessment was passed, would have no evidentiary or corroborative value to be the basis for coming to an adverse view in the case on hand, since it was recorded behind the assessee’s back, from a person who was not involved in the purchase of the said shares and also since the assessee was not afforded opportunity for rebuttal of the same and to cross-examine the said person. - Since no adverse finding has been rendered in respect of the direct materi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e and therefore direct the AO to delete the said addition and accept the LTCG income of ₹ 93,00,012/- shown as exempt under section 10(38) of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. 3801/Mum/2011 - Dated:- 27-4-2016 - Shri Jason P. Boaz, Accountant Member And Shri Sandeep Gosain, Judicial Member For the Assessee : Shri Rajkumar Singh For the Revenue : Capt. Pradeep Arya ORDER Per Jason P. Boaz, A.M. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-30, Mumb .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct and the case was subsequently taken up for scrutiny. In the course of assessment proceedings, the AO observed that the shares of Shukun Constructions Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the said shares ) are nothing but penny stock and that the assessee has back dated the purchase of the said shares in transactions to generate artificial gain. He required the assessee to substantiate her claim of exemption on the capital gain arising on the sale of the said shares. After considering the details, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n Constructions Ltd. is not a genuine transaction but a fabricated one. In that view of the matter, the AO, while concluding the assessment, treated the entire sale proceeds of the said shares amounting to ₹ 95,12,812/- as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act and brought the same to tax in the assessee s hand. The assessment was accordingly completed under section 143(3) of the Act, vide order dated 31.12.2007 wherein the assessee s income was determined at ₹ 96,32,470 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

24.02.2011 for A.Y. 2005-06, the assessee has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal raising the following revised grounds of appeal: - I - Appeal Ground No.1:- That on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. C.I.T. (Appeals) has erred in confirming the addition made by the ld. Assessing Officer u/s. 68 of the I.T. Act,1961 at ₹ 95,12,812/- on the basis of amount found credited in the bank account of appellant without adjudicating the legal plea raised that assessee appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ess of the said transaction was established on assessment record with the support of related documentary evidences. 3 - Appeal Ground No.3:- a) That the ld. C.I.T (Appeals) has erred in confirming the disallowance of exemption claim made u/s. 10(38) at ₹ 93,00,012/- in respect of long-term capital gain earned on sale of listed equity shares sold through recognized stock exchange which has duly been subjected to security transaction tax(S.T.T.). b) That without prejudice to appeal grounds n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

prior to its sale, which has been confirmed by the respective share broker as well as Stock Exchange in cross verification carried out and no irregularity or any allegation for the same has been found or made. 4- That the all the appeal grounds raised hereinabove are independent grounds and without prejudice to each other. 3.2.1 On a perusal of the grounds raised (supra), it is seen that all of these are interlinked and pertain to the addition of ₹ 95,12,812/- of unexplained cash credit u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ectures and surmises, totally disregarding the documentary evidences furnished in the course of assessment proceedings. It is submitted that the impugned order of the learned CIT(A) was almost a verbatim reproduction of the order of assessment and the conclusion was rendered summarily without any proper reasoning; i.e. basically it was a non-speaking order. 3.2.2 The learned A.R. for the assessee submitted that the assessee had furnished all the necessary documents as required to establish the g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stock broker for sale of the said shares through Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), evidencing the payment of Securities Transaction Tax (STT) thereon, price movement evidence of stock on BSE on which the said shares were listed and traded and also copy of the bank statement of the assessee evidencing the receipt of sale proceeds of the said shares through regular banking channels. The learned A.R. for the assessee submitted that all these documentary evidences were furnished before the AO in the cour .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AO. It is submitted that subsequently the AO passed the order of assessment ignoring all the documentary evidence furnished by the assessee and made an addition of the entire sale proceeds of the said shares under section 68 of the Act on the presumption and suspicion that the purchases of the said shares by the assessee was a back dated and arranged transaction. 3.2.4 In this regard, the learned A.R. for the assessee submitted that enquiry by the AO revealed that the sale transaction of the sai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y adopted by interested persons through tainted stock brokers for arranged back dated purchase of penny stocks/shares, late filing of return, etc. is contrary to all the facts of the case and the evidence brought on record and filed by the assessee to establish that in the case on hand, the assessee had filed her return of income for A.Y. 2004-05 (i.e. the year in which the said shares were purchased) within the due date as per the provisions of section 139(1) of the Act. It is submitted that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A.R. for the assessee that the assessee had purchased the said shares through M/s. Falgun Finvest, an authorised sub-broker duly registered with SEBI, who had given the delivery of the said shares in physical form through off market trade with appropriate transfer forms and these physical share certificates were lodged for transfer in the name of the assessee. It is submitted that copies of the said share certificates duly transferred in the name of the assessee were placed before the AO and for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act with duly audited accounts and having been processed and accepted by the Department, it is contended that the AO s observation in the order of assessment for A.Y. 2005-06 that the purchases of the said shares are not genuine/arranged/back dated hold no water. It is submitted that if the AO had real proof that the purchases of the said shares was backdated/ arranged, etc. then nothing prevented him from initiating proceedings for re-opening the assessment for A.Y. 2004-05 upto 31.03.2011 as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dwa (ITA No. 8573/Mum/2010 dated 24.08.2012) and (ii) Harkhchand K. Gada HUF (ITA Nos. 1772, 1773, 1775, 1778 & 1779/Mum/2010 and others dated 08.08.2012. 3.2.5 The learned A.R. for the assessee contends that all the facts and evidences placed on record before the authorities below goes to establish that the orders of the AO/CIT(A) on the issue of treating the sale proceeds of ₹ 95,12,812/- on sale of the said shares as unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Act were based no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

un Invest whose Proprietor is Smt. Charu N. Sanghvi, whereas the statement relied on by the AO in the order of assessment was of Shri Niraj Sanghvi, husband of Smt. Charu N. Sanghvi on 31.12.2007, the day the order of assessment was passed without either making the same available to the assessee for rebuttal or giving the assessee due opportunity to cross-examine Shri Niraj Sanghvi. In support of the proposition that denial of opportunity to the assessee to cross-examine the witness, whose state .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder section 68 of the Act made by the AO was after detailed analysis of the facts of the case and the learned CIT(A) has correctly confirmed the same. It was prayed that the impugned order of the learned CIT(A) be upheld. 3.4.1 We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused and carefully considered the material on record, including the judicial pronouncements cited. From a perusal of the Paper Book (pages i to viii and pages 1 to 72) containing copies of written submissions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee, viz., Balance Sheet of earlier years showing that the fact of holding these shares were furnished before the AO from 16.07.2007 onwards, i.e. well before the assessment was concluded on 31.12.2007. It is also seen that the show cause notice issued by the AO to the assessee on 13.11.2007 as to why the transaction in the said shares be not treated as a bogus/arranged one was replied to by the assessee vide letter dated 21.11.2007 addressed to the AO. In our considered view, after an appre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

concluded, i.e. 31.12.2007, was recorded behind the back of the assessee and neither copy of the same was given to the assessee for rebuttal, nor was the assessee allowed due opportunity to cross-examine Shri Niraj Sanghvi. It is seen from the record that no statement was recorded from Smt. Charu Sanghvi, Proprietor, Falgun Invest from whom the assessee purchased the said shares of M/s. Shukun Constructions Ltd. In this factual and legal matrix as discussed above, we find that the statement of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d by the assessee, there is no evidence on record to show that any action or enquiry was carried out either by the SEBI or BSE in respect of the alleged manipulation or propping up of the price rate movement of the said shares of Shukun Constructions Ltd., as has been assessed by the AO. We find from the details filed by the assessee on record in pursuance of the query by the AO in the course of assessment proceedings, that the shares of Shukun Constructions Ltd. is listed on BSE and that the sa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. In our considered view, in these factual circumstances, the assessee has discharged the onus required under section 68 of the Act as she has established the identity of the payer, source of funds received on sale of the same shares and the genuineness of the transaction. 3.4.3 The addition under section 68 of the Act in the case on hand, it appears, has been made only because the AO presumed that the purchases of the said shares of M/s. Shukun Constructions Ltd. were not made on the date as di .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

shares , the AO ought to have or would have proceeded to initiate proceedings for reopening the assessment for A.Y. 2004-05 while concluding the assessment for A.Y. 2005-06, the year under consideration, on 31.12.2007 or thereafter till 31.03.2011, which he has not done. 3.4.4 We also find that the decision of the ITAT, Chandigarh Bench, in the case of Somnath Mani (100 TTJ 917) relied on by the AO is factually different and not applicable to the facts of the assessee s case. In that case, the f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

see received the full sale proceeds of the sales of the said shares from the stock broker as and when they were sold; BSE has confirmed her sale transaction on the date shown and also the fact that the said shares on sale have been transferred to the buyer immediately is evident from her D-MAT account. In this factual matrix, we find that the decision in the case of Somnath Mani (supra) is factually different and distinguishable from the case on hand; is not applicable to reach an adverse findin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he order a nullity in as much as it amounted to violation of the principles of natural justice because of which the assessee was adversely affected. In our considered view, this judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court supports the case of the assessee in the case on hand as she was not afforded any opportunity of cross-examination of Shri Niraj Sanghvi whose statement was a basis for the AO making the addition under section 68 of the Act. This finding of ours is in addition to our earlier findin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d on the basis of presumptions and surmises in respect of penny stock without conducting any inquiry and by disregarding the direct evidences on record by the assessee. 3.4.7 In the decision of the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Harkhchand K. Gada (HUF) & Others in ITA Nos. 1772 to 1775, 1788 & 1789/Mum/2010 dated 08.08.2012 relied on by the assessee, on similar facts, the Coordinate Bench, following the judgements of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Muk .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the sale/purchase transaction in shares such as brokers contract notes, confirmation of receipt of sale proceeds through regular banking channels, reflection of these transactions in the assessee s audited financial statements and relevant returns of income and it was held by the Bench that in these circumstances, the sale of shares could not be held to be non-genuine. 3.4.8 From the appreciation of the facts of the case, the material evidence placed on record by the assessee and in the light of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

onstructions Ltd., copies of the physical share certificates and her D-MAT account statement establishing the holding of the shares in her name prior to the sale thereof; confirmation of the transactions of buying and selling of the said shares by the respective stock brokers, receipt of sale proceeds through banking channels, etc. As observed earlier in this order, we are of the view that the statement recorded from Shri Niraj Sanghvi on 31.12.2007, the day the order of assessment was passed, w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Manpower Service provider

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Forum: Construction of single unit bungalow

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version