GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (6) TMI 947 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2016 (6) TMI 947 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - TMI - Input tax credit - TNVAT - non-filing of return by the selling dealer - challenge to the proceedings initiated by the AO where the Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by the petitioner, has been reversed, on the ground that, it is in excess of what the petitioner is entitled to avail - Held that:- The ratio deducible from the decisions are that, ITC shall not be disallowed for the reasons that the seller had not been assessed, since the selling dealer has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion 19 (1) of the Act. - The liability had to be fastened on the selling dealer and not on the petitioner-dealer which had shown proof of payment of tax on purchases made. - Decided in favor of assessee. - Writ Petition Nos. 305 to 308 of 2016, W.M.P.Nos.194 to 201 of 2016 - Dated:- 2-6-2016 - The Hon'ble Mr.Justice T.S.Sivagnanam For the Petitioner : Mr. V. Sundareeswaran For the Respondent : Mr. S. Kanmani Annamalai ORDER Since the issue involved in these Writ Petition and the parties .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Writ Petitions is to the proceedings of the Assessing Officer, dated 28.09.2015, in and by which, the Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by the petitioner, has been reversed, on the ground that, it is in excess of what the petitioner is entitled to avail. 4. The petitioner was served with a notice, dated 12.08.2015, stating that, on cross verification of the monthly returns for all the four years, viz., 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 from the Department's website, it is found that the pet .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed ITC on the basis of purchased bills, and requested the Officer to verify the Annexure II of the sellers and to drop proceedings. The respondent, however, did not accept the explanation given by the petitioner, and passed the impugned orders. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the ITC could not have been reversed based on website reports, and this has been held to be illegal, in several decisions. To buttress the said contention, reliance was placed on the decisi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ucible from the decisions referred to above are that, ITC shall not be disallowed for the reasons that the seller had not been assessed, since the selling dealer has not filed returns. In fact, the decision of the Delhi High Court was after amendment of the Act, yet, it was held that ITC shall not be disallowed for the earlier period, i.e., prior to the amendment. In the case of Infiniti Wholesale Ltd.,, referred above, this Court took into consideration the decision in the case of Althaf Shoes, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing the relief granted and levying penalty. While considering the said case, it was held that the circular issued by the Commissioner clearly states that so long as the vendor is found to be a registered dealer on the files of the Revenue, the claim of the assessee for refund could not be rejected nor delayed. Revenue in the said case did not deny, as a matter of fact, that the assessees vendors are all registered dealers on the files of the Revenue and the assessee had also given the TIN number .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

annot, by any length of reasoning, be denied by the Revenue. The mere fact that the Revenue had not made an assessment on the assessees vendor, per se, cannot stand in the way of the assessing officer considering the claim of the assessee under section 19 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act. A reading of the circular issued by Commissioner along with the provisions of the Act makes it clear that there is nothing repugnant in the said circular issued by the Commissioner as a head of the Departm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version