GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (6) TMI 954 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2016 (6) TMI 954 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT - 2016 (340) E.L.T. 45 (Guj.) - Recovery of redemption fine from the petitioner - confiscate the goods of 22 bales which could not be located and seized - petitioners submitted that the initial action of the show cause notice was against 10 persons and since the petitioner himself was not the ultimate importer, atleast, the issue of redemption of fine cannot be proposed against him. - Held that:- Neither in the body of the show cause notice, nor in the ultim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the order-inoriginal that such fine would be borne by the petitioner, it was simply not open for the department to seek recovery thereof from the petitioner. - Decided in favor of petitioner. - SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7301 of 2015 - Dated:- 3-5-2016 - Akil Kureshi And A. Y. Kogje, JJ. For the Petitioner : MR PARESH M DAVE, ADVOCATE For the Respondent : MRS VD NANAVATI, ADVOCATE JUDGMENT ( Per : Honourable Mr. Justice A. Y. Kogje ) 1. The petitioners before this Court challenge action of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nted to import old and used cloths for helping the victims of earthquake in Kutch and thereby wanted to take advantage of Central Government notification No.7 of 2001 dated 27.01.2001 allowing exemption from customs duty. 2.3 In connection with this import, a show cause notice dated 26.03.2002 came to be issued and it appears that the show cause notice was directed towards 10 persons, which included the petitioners. The show cause notice proposed, amongst other things, confiscation of goods of 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in lieu of confiscation was imposed. The order also contained other directions. But, it seems that this particular part of the order imposing fine in lieu of confiscation was not acceptable to the petitioners and hence, an appeal was preferred before the CESTAT. Though in appeal, a prayer was made to set aside the redemption fine, but it appears that the same is not addressed to by the CESTAT. So far as the petitioners are concerned, the penalty imposed was set aside. 2.4 It is after the order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nst him. In the show cause notice, there is nothing to suggest that the petitioners are responsible for importing the goods. Learned Counsel also took us through the Order in Original, where also finding is given to the effect that one Shri Motilal Saraf has masterminded entire conspiracy of diversion of goods into local area with the help of other persons and the actual role that appears is that some wrong documents of the petitioner trust are put forward. Therefore, apparently, there does not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version